| Contenuto dell'articolo |
- From johnmenc@optonline.net Mon Sep 19 05:41:00 2005
Return-Path: <johnmenc@optonline.net>
X-Sender: johnmenc@optonline.net
X-Apparently-To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
Received: (qmail 73280 invoked from network); 19 Sep 2005 12:40:59 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218)
by m31.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 19 Sep 2005 12:40:59 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO n5.bulk.dcn.yahoo.com) (216.155.201.70)
by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 19 Sep 2005 12:40:58 -0000
Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
Received: from [216.155.201.64] by n5.bulk.dcn.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 19 Sep 2005 12:40:55 -0000
Received: from [66.218.69.3] by mailer1.bulk.dcn.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 19 Sep 2005 12:40:55 -0000
Received: from [66.218.66.82] by mailer3.bulk.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 19 Sep 2005 12:40:55 -0000
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 12:40:54 -0000
To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
Message-ID: <dgmbkm+utd1@eGroups.com>
User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Length: 3414
X-Mailer: Yahoo Groups Message Poster
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: groups-compose
X-Originating-IP: 216.155.201.70
X-eGroups-Msg-Info: 1:12:0:0
X-Yahoo-Post-IP: 65.164.33.248
From: "John Lorenzo" <johnmenc@optonline.net>
Subject: Hand Held XRF's - FYI
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=111282553; y=ORFuB591G78M6Z-nOKSlg3K0K2Hg4dRF9sSlr71gSOO06YksrFp-mgFsXA
X-Yahoo-Profile: colonial_john_c4
There are 2 messages totalling 81 lines in this issue.
Topics of the day:
1. Handheld XRF (2)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
-
Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2005 00:38:43 +0100
From: Evelyne Godfrey <egodfrey@UMW.EDU>
Subject: Handheld XRF
Dear All,
I seem to recall messages about portable handheld XRF meters on this
List
some time ago... could someone remind me of what the bottom line
was, in
terms of cost, usefulness, whether there was one type more
recommended than
another? We're analysing archaeological and museum artefacts, and
historic
architectural samples of different materials, although primarily
metal.
Cheers,
Evelyne
------------------------------
Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2005 10:35:12 -0700
From: david killick <killick@EMAIL.ARIZONA.EDU>
Subject: Re: Handheld XRF
Our conservation department here has one of these, and I've made some
use of it. There are two types - the genuinely portable ones with
radioactive sources for excitation, and the semiportable types that
have a miniature x-ray tube and need to be plugged in to the mains
or a
portable power supply. The one I've used has the radioactive source,
and I doubt that I would bother to buy one if I had $25,000 lying
around, which I don't. All handheld XRFs have an air gap between
sample
and detector that absorbs weak x-rays, and thus can't detect anything
of lower atomic number than sodium, but there are additional
limitations with radioactive sources. None of them cover the whole
range of elements that I would want in analyzing slags, so one would
have to change sources to get a full listing of elements in the
sample.
(The americium source is the most common, and will only give you
elements with atomic numbers from titanium up; from titanium down the
iron sources is used. The sources only last a few years, and are very
expensive to replace. Being radioactive, they are also a real pain as
far as permits are concerned - perhaps not a concern if only used in
Britain, but taking one abroad would require all sorts of permits.
Our conservation department make a lot of use of this instrument in
collections management - for example, it's a quick way of finding out
if older biological specimens have been conserved with arsenic. But I
frankly would not spend such a large amount for an instrument to be
used in the field. You can put together a little collection of field
tools for archaeometallurgy - an acid bottle, a charcoal block and
blowpipe, a short length of platinum wire, a few chemicals, a
miniature
propane torch, a scratch plate, a magnet, a hand lens, a small short-
and long-wave UV lamp, and a copy of an old text (pre-1960's) on
determinative mineralogy (to tell you how to make effective use of
the
first four items listed) for about $250. These will identify the
major
elements in most samples that you will encounter in the field at
minimal cost.
Dave Killick
On Sep 16, 2005, at 4:38 PM, Evelyne Godfrey wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> I seem to recall messages about portable handheld XRF meters on
this
> List
> some time ago... could someone remind me of what the bottom line
was,
> in
> terms of cost, usefulness, whether there was one type more
recommended
> than
> another? We're analysing archaeological and museum artefacts, and
> historic
> architectural samples of different materials, although primarily
metal.
>
> Cheers,
> Evelyne
|
|---|
