How long did 1775 counterfeit halfpence circulate in London??? Öffentlichkeit Deposited
[Colonial Numismatics] Re
Re
- From johnwlouis@comcast.net Sat Jan 21 16:44:46 2006
Return-Path: <johnwlouis@comcast.net>
X-Sender: johnwlouis@comcast.net
X-Apparently-To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
Received: (qmail 79953 invoked from network); 22 Jan 2006 00:44:46 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.167)
by m28.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 22 Jan 2006 00:44:46 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO sccrmhc14.comcast.net) (204.127.202.59)
by mta6.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 22 Jan 2006 00:44:45 -0000
Received: from JWLouis (unknown[71.225.199.42](misconfigured sender))
by comcast.net (sccrmhc14) with SMTP
id <2006012200411601400kmuhre>; Sun, 22 Jan 2006 00:41:17 +0000
Message-ID: <001501c61eec$8b6c17f0$6502a8c0@JWLouis>
To: <colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com>
References: <dqthjh+g7hk@eGroups.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 19:41:12 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
format=flowed;
charset="iso-8859-1";
reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180
X-Originating-IP: 204.127.202.59
X-eGroups-Msg-Info: 1:12:0:0
From: "John Louis" <johnwlouis@comcast.net>
Subject: Re: [Colonial Numismatics] Re: How long did 1775 counterfeit halfpence circulate in London???
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=251832052; y=n6-Z-c5W74Wx0ewKyWxzRtlqexQ1V1L9nAo9kXYx8cy3DdPG
X-Yahoo-Profile: j33digger
Well, you may be right about one thing..............There are so darn many
of those 1806's and 1807's NOW!!!
I can only imagine how many were floating around back in the day!
John
----- Original Message -----
From: "Byron Weston" <bkweston@verizon.net>
To: <colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, January 21, 2006 9:48 AM
Subject: [Colonial Numismatics] Re: How long did 1775 counterfeit halfpence
circulate in London???
> --- In colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com, "John Louis" <johnwlouis@c...>
> wrote:
>>
>> Maybe they accepted them for 1/2 price? ...or whatever % less than
> the new
>> regals? maybe 3 for 1? etc? etc?
>> ...just a guess
>> jwl
>
> I'm not sure that what transpired in America during the coppers paninc
> of 1789 can be applied to what may have happened later in England,
> John, but I think the beginning of the end came with Boulton's
> cartwheel coinage of 1797 and that the circulation of counterfeits in
> England likely ceased by and/or no later than 1807 by which time there
> may have been sufficient full weight regal issues in circulation that
> accepting underweight counterfeits, at any rate of exchange, no longer
> made any sense. I would think by that time it was doubtful that
> merchants would have accepted underweight base copper counterfeits
> instead of the new full weight pure copper halfpence. The circulation
> of counterfeit halfpence had been by necessity, but that necessity
> quickly erroded. Instead of bad money driving out the good the complete
> opposite happened in England.
> Byron
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
> - 2006-01-21
- 1
