文章內容 |
- From bkweston@verizon.net Mon Jan 23 12:07:27 2006
Return-Path: <bkweston@verizon.net> X-Sender: bkweston@verizon.net X-Apparently-To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 85962 invoked from network); 23 Jan 2006 20:07:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218) by m34.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 23 Jan 2006 20:07:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO n2a.bullet.dcn.yahoo.com) (216.155.203.222) by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 23 Jan 2006 20:07:26 -0000 Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys Received: from [216.155.201.64] by n2.bullet.dcn.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 23 Jan 2006 20:07:18 -0000 Received: from [66.218.69.2] by t1.bullet.dcn.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 23 Jan 2006 20:07:17 -0000 Received: from [66.218.66.77] by t2.bullet.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 23 Jan 2006 20:07:17 -0000 Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 20:07:15 -0000 To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com Message-ID: <dr3d1j+pp7q@eGroups.com> In-Reply-To: <20060123195355.92520.qmail@web30704.mail.mud.yahoo.com> User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Yahoo Groups Message Poster X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: groups-compose X-Originating-IP: 216.155.203.222 X-eGroups-Msg-Info: 1:12:0:0 X-Yahoo-Post-IP: 141.158.209.26 From: "Byron Weston" <bkweston@verizon.net> Subject: [Colonial Numismatics] Re: Halfpence circulation. X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=216644765; y=n2mpdvFrZbOqWwdO6y6bSbRiTTB00yAJL7G83NDt__ckcRc X-Yahoo-Profile: bkweston
Hi Bill, et al. I believe current US law states something to the effect that=20 defacement of US coins must be something done in such a manner that=20 it adds value to the coin above its face value. I had looked up the=20 statute but probably would not have worried too about it, regardless,=20 when I sold some cut-out coin jewelry for a friend. Byron=20 =20=20
--- In colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com, William Triest <wtriest2@y...>=20 wrote: > > Yes, I thought so. >=20 > I do wonder though if the law would apply to > elongations, enamelling, love tokens etc, or would it > have been enforced selectively. >=20 > But, I don't expect to gain much through blackmail, > however. Not even a defaced coin. >=20 > Bill > --- Steve Frank <taxi_steve929@y...> wrote: >=20 > > That was more tongue in cheek Bill.<s>.....how about > > elongated pennies? (cents for the purists)<s> > >=20 > > William Triest <wtriest2@y...> wrote: What is > > Jim defacing? The UK has periodically > > demonitized old coinage, and the old shillings and > > pence (pre decimal era) are in that category now.=20 > > Otherwise, the whole mailgroup has a blackmail > > opportunity. Free sampl;es for all! > >=20 > > Yes, I was indeed referring to countermarking > > counterfeits. > >=20 > > I wonder how the law mentioned by Steve would apply > > to > > "love tokens" and the enameled coins that the late > > Victorians produced. > >=20 > > Bill Triest > >=20 > > --- Steve Frank <taxi_steve929@y...> wrote: > >=20 > > > David, I read the question "To put advertising on > > > counterfeits"....not the regal pieces. I wonder if > > > that law is still on the books...if it is, Jim > > > Skalbe is in a heap of trouble.<s> > > >=20 > > > "palmers4@e..." <palmers4@e...> wrote:=20 > > I > > > forget when it happened, but Great Britain passed > > > legislation making it a > > > crime to counterstamp "coin of the realm". I > > believe > > > it was later in the > > > 19th century, which is why all the PEAR'S SOAP C/S > > > are on French coins.=20 > > > But in answer to your question, MAYBE.=20 > > > We see them as advertising "tokens" now, I have no > > > context as to what they > > > were considered then. I would think they were > > viewed > > > by authoirities as > > > damaged and debased coins, so I would think they > > had > > > no problem with people > > > damaging already debased coinage? David=20 > > >=20 > > > Original Message: > > > ----------------- > > > From: William Triest wtriest2@y... > > > Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2006 11:03:35 -0800 (PST) > > > To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com > > > Subject: Re: [Colonial Numismatics] Re: Halfpence > > > circulation. > > >=20 > > >=20 > > > <html><body> > > >=20 > > >=20 > > > <tt> > > > As an exercise in legalistic semantics:<BR> > > > If counterfeits had become illegal, but > > merchant<BR> > > > tokens were still permitted, would putting > > > advertising<BR> > > > on a counterfeit convert it to a quasi-legal > > > merchant<BR> > > > token?<BR> > > > <BR> > > > Just a thought.<BR> > > > <BR> > > > Bill Triest<BR> > > > <BR> > > > --- Byron Weston <bkweston@v...> wrote:<BR> > > > <BR> > > > > I think this is the first time that you've > > > agreed<BR> > > > > with me to such an <BR> > > > > extent, John. I think I'll mark my calendar!<BR> > > > > Byron<BR> > > > > <BR> > > > > --- In colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com, "John<BR> > > > > Lorenzo" <johnmenc@o...> <BR> > > > > wrote:<BR> > > > > ><BR> > > > > > Agreed - it seems so - I still like Mike > > > Ringo's<BR> > > > > analogy - they <BR> > > > > > became so worthless and fround upon that the > > > only<BR> > > > > real worth within <BR> > > > > > England may have been nothing more than base > > > metal<BR> > > > > pieces which had <BR> > > > > > very limited value and ONE purpose would have > > > been<BR> > > > > as possibly <BR> > > > > > advertising cards such as this piece. I guess > > > it<BR> > > > > was one thing to <BR> > > > > > try to use them as money - but in terms of the > > > law<BR> > > > > -it did not seem <BR> > > > > > a problem to put your OWN SIGNATURE on the<BR> > > > > counterfeits to <BR> > > > > advertise <BR> > > > > > your business without worrying about the > > > POLICE<BR> > > > > coming in with a <BR> > > > > > warrant. If one was stuck with a hoard ...<BR> > > > > exportation to the <BR> > > > > > colonies of course seems logigal ... don't > > > expect<BR> > > > > this piece going <BR> > > > > > on E-Bay anytime soon ... when I did buy > > > this<BR> > > > > piece I did ask the <BR> > > > > > main question: Why would someone advertise > > > his<BR> > > > > business on such a <BR> > > > > > piece or self incriminate himself using such > > > a<BR> > > > > host coin? I guess <BR> > > > > > its more about quantity and for what purpose > > > the<BR> > > > > CC's were being <BR> > > > > > used in the English economy during their > > > RAPID<BR> > > > > decline in the very <BR> > > > > > early 19th century ... <BR> > > > > > <BR> > > > > > --- In colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com, > > > "Byron<BR> > > > > Weston" <BR> > > > > > <bkweston@v...> wrote:<BR> > > > > > ><BR> > > > > > > --- In colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com, > > > "John<BR> > > > > Lorenzo" <BR> > > > > > <johnmenc@o...> <BR> > > > > > > wrote:<BR> > > > > > > ><BR> > > > > > > > It's hard to deny ... every couple of > > > years<BR> > > > > someone tells me to <BR> > > > > > look <BR> > > > > > > > in Peck for this or that as an > > alternate<BR> > > > > source of <BR> > > > > > information ... I <BR> > > > > > > > am overdue ... maybe this counterstamp > > > piece<BR> > > > > is the trigger ...<BR> > > > > > > <BR> > > > > > > By the time your counterstamp may have > > > been<BR> > > > > counterstamped <BR> > > > > (>1810) <BR> > > > > > it <BR> > > > > > > is doubtful that counterfeit halfpence > > > were<BR> > > > > still in general <BR> > > > > > > circulation, John, as apparently most > > were<BR> > > > > melted by then, as <BR> > > > > well <BR> > > > > > as <BR> > > > > > > many of Boulton's earlier Cartwheel coinage > > > of<BR> > > > > Pence and Twopence.<BR> > > > > > > Byron<BR> > > > > > ><BR> > > > > ><BR> > > > > <BR> > > > > <BR> > > > > <BR> > > > > <BR> > > > > <BR> > > > <BR> > > > <BR> > > > > > > __________________________________________________<BR> > > > Do You Yahoo!?<BR> > > > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam > > > protection around <BR> > > > <a > > > > > > href=3D"http://mail.yahoo.com">http://mail.yahoo.com</a> > > > <BR> > > > </tt> > > >=20 > > >=20 > > >=20=20=20=20=20 > > > <!-- |**|begin egp html banner|**| --> > > >=20 > > > <br><br> > > > <div style=3D"width:500px; text-align:right; > > > margin-bottom:1px; > > > color:#909090;"> > > > <tt>SPONSORED LINKS</tt> > > > </div> > >=20 > =3D=3D=3D message truncated =3D=3D=3D >=20 >=20 > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around=20 > http://mail.yahoo.com >
|
來源網址 |
|
發布日期 |
|
體積 |
|