Halfpence circulation. 上市 Deposited

[Colonial Numismatics] Re

文章內容
  • From bkweston@verizon.net Mon Jan 23 12:07:27 2006
    Return-Path: <bkweston@verizon.net>
    X-Sender: bkweston@verizon.net
    X-Apparently-To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
    Received: (qmail 85962 invoked from network); 23 Jan 2006 20:07:26 -0000
    Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218)
    by m34.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 23 Jan 2006 20:07:26 -0000
    Received: from unknown (HELO n2a.bullet.dcn.yahoo.com) (216.155.203.222)
    by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 23 Jan 2006 20:07:26 -0000
    Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
    Received: from [216.155.201.64] by n2.bullet.dcn.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 23 Jan 2006 20:07:18 -0000
    Received: from [66.218.69.2] by t1.bullet.dcn.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 23 Jan 2006 20:07:17 -0000
    Received: from [66.218.66.77] by t2.bullet.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 23 Jan 2006 20:07:17 -0000
    Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 20:07:15 -0000
    To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
    Message-ID: <dr3d1j+pp7q@eGroups.com>
    In-Reply-To: <20060123195355.92520.qmail@web30704.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
    User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82
    MIME-Version: 1.0
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
    X-Mailer: Yahoo Groups Message Poster
    X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: groups-compose
    X-Originating-IP: 216.155.203.222
    X-eGroups-Msg-Info: 1:12:0:0
    X-Yahoo-Post-IP: 141.158.209.26
    From: "Byron Weston" <bkweston@verizon.net>
    Subject: [Colonial Numismatics] Re: Halfpence circulation.
    X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=216644765; y=n2mpdvFrZbOqWwdO6y6bSbRiTTB00yAJL7G83NDt__ckcRc
    X-Yahoo-Profile: bkweston

    Hi Bill, et al.
    I believe current US law states something to the effect that=20
    defacement of US coins must be something done in such a manner that=20
    it adds value to the coin above its face value. I had looked up the=20
    statute but probably would not have worried too about it, regardless,=20
    when I sold some cut-out coin jewelry for a friend.
    Byron=20
    =20=20

    --- In colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com, William Triest <wtriest2@y...>=20
    wrote:
    >
    > Yes, I thought so.
    >=20
    > I do wonder though if the law would apply to
    > elongations, enamelling, love tokens etc, or would it
    > have been enforced selectively.
    >=20
    > But, I don't expect to gain much through blackmail,
    > however. Not even a defaced coin.
    >=20
    > Bill
    > --- Steve Frank <taxi_steve929@y...> wrote:
    >=20
    > > That was more tongue in cheek Bill.<s>.....how about
    > > elongated pennies? (cents for the purists)<s>
    > >=20
    > > William Triest <wtriest2@y...> wrote: What is
    > > Jim defacing? The UK has periodically
    > > demonitized old coinage, and the old shillings and
    > > pence (pre decimal era) are in that category now.=20
    > > Otherwise, the whole mailgroup has a blackmail
    > > opportunity. Free sampl;es for all!
    > >=20
    > > Yes, I was indeed referring to countermarking
    > > counterfeits.
    > >=20
    > > I wonder how the law mentioned by Steve would apply
    > > to
    > > "love tokens" and the enameled coins that the late
    > > Victorians produced.
    > >=20
    > > Bill Triest
    > >=20
    > > --- Steve Frank <taxi_steve929@y...> wrote:
    > >=20
    > > > David, I read the question "To put advertising on
    > > > counterfeits"....not the regal pieces. I wonder if
    > > > that law is still on the books...if it is, Jim
    > > > Skalbe is in a heap of trouble.<s>
    > > >=20
    > > > "palmers4@e..." <palmers4@e...> wrote:=20
    > > I
    > > > forget when it happened, but Great Britain passed
    > > > legislation making it a
    > > > crime to counterstamp "coin of the realm". I
    > > believe
    > > > it was later in the
    > > > 19th century, which is why all the PEAR'S SOAP C/S
    > > > are on French coins.=20
    > > > But in answer to your question, MAYBE.=20
    > > > We see them as advertising "tokens" now, I have no
    > > > context as to what they
    > > > were considered then. I would think they were
    > > viewed
    > > > by authoirities as
    > > > damaged and debased coins, so I would think they
    > > had
    > > > no problem with people
    > > > damaging already debased coinage? David=20
    > > >=20
    > > > Original Message:
    > > > -----------------
    > > > From: William Triest wtriest2@y...
    > > > Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2006 11:03:35 -0800 (PST)
    > > > To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
    > > > Subject: Re: [Colonial Numismatics] Re: Halfpence
    > > > circulation.
    > > >=20
    > > >=20
    > > > <html><body>
    > > >=20
    > > >=20
    > > > <tt>
    > > > As an exercise in legalistic semantics:<BR>
    > > > If counterfeits had become illegal, but
    > > merchant<BR>
    > > > tokens were still permitted, would putting
    > > > advertising<BR>
    > > > on a counterfeit convert it to a quasi-legal
    > > > merchant<BR>
    > > > token?<BR>
    > > > <BR>
    > > > Just a thought.<BR>
    > > > <BR>
    > > > Bill Triest<BR>
    > > > <BR>
    > > > --- Byron Weston <bkweston@v...> wrote:<BR>
    > > > <BR>
    > > > > I think this is the first time that you've
    > > > agreed<BR>
    > > > > with me to such an <BR>
    > > > > extent, John. I think I'll mark my calendar!<BR>
    > > > > Byron<BR>
    > > > > <BR>
    > > > > --- In colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com, "John<BR>
    > > > > Lorenzo" <johnmenc@o...> <BR>
    > > > > wrote:<BR>
    > > > > ><BR>
    > > > > > Agreed - it seems so - I still like Mike
    > > > Ringo's<BR>
    > > > > analogy - they <BR>
    > > > > > became so worthless and fround upon that the
    > > > only<BR>
    > > > > real worth within <BR>
    > > > > > England may have been nothing more than base
    > > > metal<BR>
    > > > > pieces which had <BR>
    > > > > > very limited value and ONE purpose would have
    > > > been<BR>
    > > > > as possibly <BR>
    > > > > > advertising cards such as this piece. I guess
    > > > it<BR>
    > > > > was one thing to <BR>
    > > > > > try to use them as money - but in terms of the
    > > > law<BR>
    > > > > -it did not seem <BR>
    > > > > > a problem to put your OWN SIGNATURE on the<BR>
    > > > > counterfeits to <BR>
    > > > > advertise <BR>
    > > > > > your business without worrying about the
    > > > POLICE<BR>
    > > > > coming in with a <BR>
    > > > > > warrant. If one was stuck with a hoard ...<BR>
    > > > > exportation to the <BR>
    > > > > > colonies of course seems logigal ... don't
    > > > expect<BR>
    > > > > this piece going <BR>
    > > > > > on E-Bay anytime soon ... when I did buy
    > > > this<BR>
    > > > > piece I did ask the <BR>
    > > > > > main question: Why would someone advertise
    > > > his<BR>
    > > > > business on such a <BR>
    > > > > > piece or self incriminate himself using such
    > > > a<BR>
    > > > > host coin? I guess <BR>
    > > > > > its more about quantity and for what purpose
    > > > the<BR>
    > > > > CC's were being <BR>
    > > > > > used in the English economy during their
    > > > RAPID<BR>
    > > > > decline in the very <BR>
    > > > > > early 19th century ... <BR>
    > > > > > <BR>
    > > > > > --- In colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com,
    > > > "Byron<BR>
    > > > > Weston" <BR>
    > > > > > <bkweston@v...> wrote:<BR>
    > > > > > ><BR>
    > > > > > > --- In colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com,
    > > > "John<BR>
    > > > > Lorenzo" <BR>
    > > > > > <johnmenc@o...> <BR>
    > > > > > > wrote:<BR>
    > > > > > > ><BR>
    > > > > > > > It's hard to deny ... every couple of
    > > > years<BR>
    > > > > someone tells me to <BR>
    > > > > > look <BR>
    > > > > > > > in Peck for this or that as an
    > > alternate<BR>
    > > > > source of <BR>
    > > > > > information ... I <BR>
    > > > > > > > am overdue ... maybe this counterstamp
    > > > piece<BR>
    > > > > is the trigger ...<BR>
    > > > > > > <BR>
    > > > > > > By the time your counterstamp may have
    > > > been<BR>
    > > > > counterstamped <BR>
    > > > > (>1810) <BR>
    > > > > > it <BR>
    > > > > > > is doubtful that counterfeit halfpence
    > > > were<BR>
    > > > > still in general <BR>
    > > > > > > circulation, John, as apparently most
    > > were<BR>
    > > > > melted by then, as <BR>
    > > > > well <BR>
    > > > > > as <BR>
    > > > > > > many of Boulton's earlier Cartwheel coinage
    > > > of<BR>
    > > > > Pence and Twopence.<BR>
    > > > > > > Byron<BR>
    > > > > > ><BR>
    > > > > ><BR>
    > > > > <BR>
    > > > > <BR>
    > > > > <BR>
    > > > > <BR>
    > > > > <BR>
    > > > <BR>
    > > > <BR>
    > > >
    > >
    > __________________________________________________<BR>
    > > > Do You Yahoo!?<BR>
    > > > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
    > > > protection around <BR>
    > > > <a
    > > >
    > >
    > href=3D"http://mail.yahoo.com">http://mail.yahoo.com</a>
    > > > <BR>
    > > > </tt>
    > > >=20
    > > >=20
    > > >=20=20=20=20=20
    > > > <!-- |**|begin egp html banner|**| -->
    > > >=20
    > > > <br><br>
    > > > <div style=3D"width:500px; text-align:right;
    > > > margin-bottom:1px;
    > > > color:#909090;">
    > > > <tt>SPONSORED LINKS</tt>
    > > > </div>
    > >=20
    > =3D=3D=3D message truncated =3D=3D=3D
    >=20
    >=20
    > __________________________________________________
    > Do You Yahoo!?
    > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around=20
    > http://mail.yahoo.com
    >





來源網址 發布日期
  • 2006-01-23
體積
  • 1

人际关系

NNP作者