V. 14-84a Pubblico Deposited
- From shamus12017@yahoo.com Wed Feb 01 08:57:50 2006
Return-Path: <shamus12017@yahoo.com>
X-Sender: shamus12017@yahoo.com
X-Apparently-To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
Received: (qmail 51928 invoked from network); 1 Feb 2006 16:57:49 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218)
by m25.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 1 Feb 2006 16:57:49 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO n5a.bullet.scd.yahoo.com) (66.94.237.39)
by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 1 Feb 2006 16:57:49 -0000
Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
Received: from [66.218.69.5] by n5.bullet.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 01 Feb 2006 16:55:12 -0000
Received: from [66.218.66.90] by t5.bullet.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 01 Feb 2006 16:55:11 -0000
Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2006 16:55:11 -0000
To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
Message-ID: <drqp5f+rplp@eGroups.com>
User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Yahoo Groups Message Poster
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: groups-compose
X-Originating-IP: 66.94.237.39
X-eGroups-Msg-Info: 1:12:0:0
X-Yahoo-Post-IP: 68.62.201.116
From: "shamus12017" <shamus12017@yahoo.com>
Subject: V. 14-84a
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=231494522; y=cC14F1S02hltUVyT7oavxLHXRXgot-gCmX3SVmUCr4gABj5Uaqo
X-Yahoo-Profile: shamus12017
Subject:=20
Re: [Colonial Numismatics] Re: Vlack 14-84a
Date:=20
Tue, 31 Jan 2006 20:11:44 -0600
To:=20
colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
References:=20
1
Byron, et al=20
The most up to date summary is in the JEANe document on Machin's. See=20
pages attached - see note 4 after 14-84a=20
Shamus=20
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=20
Byron Weston wrote:=20
--- In colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com, "Byron Weston" <
bkweston@v...>=20
wrote:=20
>=20
> Hi Tracy,=20
Newman ignored this much earlier documentation in his research and=20
in 1976 theorized it to have been made in North Swansea, MA.=20
> Byron=20
This should probably say; Newman cited but ignored...=20
Interestingly, Newman had cited a lack of earlier British=20
documentation of the 1785-dated counterfeits as his premise that=20
these counterfeits were made in England specifically for export to=20
America - sort of a double standard when you think about it. The=20
true=20
and only differences between the 1785 counterfeits and V.14-84A=20
basically being design style. We now know that several counterfeits=20
of this date now resting in American collections came from Britain=20
via eBay and that many varieties of crude style counterfeits were=20
made in England.=20
Byron - 2006-02-01
- 1
