| Article content |
- From CMcdon0923@aol.com Fri Mar 03 14:13:29 2006
Return-Path: <CMcdon0923@aol.com>
X-Sender: CMcdon0923@aol.com
X-Apparently-To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
Received: (qmail 80920 invoked from network); 3 Mar 2006 22:13:29 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217)
by m30.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 3 Mar 2006 22:13:29 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO imo-m17.mx.aol.com) (64.12.138.207)
by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 3 Mar 2006 22:13:29 -0000
Received: from CMcdon0923@aol.com
by imo-m17.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v38_r7.3.) id r.60.673b6cad (4426)
for <colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com>; Fri, 3 Mar 2006 17:13:23 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <60.673b6cad.313a1982@aol.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2006 17:13:22 EST
To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-----------------------------1141424002"
X-Mailer: 9.0 SE for Windows sub 5021
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Originating-IP: 64.12.138.207
X-eGroups-Msg-Info: 1:12:0:0
From: CMcdon0923@aol.com
Subject: Re: [Colonial Numismatics] Re: serendipity
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=2446688; y=Tjj4zOK5V5yre7L3eSHXcCQbKkN22epYqyLThAN_akkR1i9I2Q
X-Yahoo-Profile: cmcdon0923
-------------------------------1141424002
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
OK.....probably not "XF", but I've seen coins with a whole lot less detail
cataloged (by people who know their stuff) as VF. I'm perfectly comfortable
with somewhere in that classification...say 20 to 25. Remember., we're
talkin' Vermonts here....well struck is the exception to the rule.
I personally think 15 is too low....look at the hair...very little actual
wear on those spots. The leaves are the highest spot, but they're never really
fully struck up anyway.
I'm not talking "net grade" here.....by those standards, certain LC
collectors would call id AG.
WHOA, ya think? I'm thinking a solid 15 and probably a "straight face
20", taking into account what Mike called Ford's VF. If actually EF
then solidly in the CC, with I think a 20 maybe scraping the bottom?
Clem
-------------------------------1141424002
Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; charset=3DUS-ASCII">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2900.2802" name=3DGENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY id=3Drole_body style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: #000000; FONT-FAMILY:=
Arial"=20
bottomMargin=3D7 leftMargin=3D7 topMargin=3D7 rightMargin=3D7><FONT id=3Dro=
le_document=20
face=3DArial color=3D#000000 size=3D2>
<DIV>
<DIV>OK.....probably not "XF", but I've seen coins with a whole lot less de=
tail=20
cataloged (by people who know their stuff) as VF. I'm perfectly=20
comfortable with somewhere in that classification...say 20 to 25. =20
Remember., we're talkin' Vermonts here....well struck is the exception to t=
he=20
rule.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>I personally think 15 is too low....look at the hair...very little act=
ual=20
wear on those spots. The leaves are the highest spot, but they're nev=
er=20
really fully struck up anyway.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>I'm not talking "net grade" here.....by those standards, certain LC=20
collectors would call id AG.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE=20
style=3D"PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: blue 2px solid">=
<FONT=20
style=3D"BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent" face=3DArial color=3D#000000 size=
=3D2>WHOA, ya=20
think? I'm thinking a solid 15 and probably a "straight face <BR>20", tak=
ing=20
into account what Mike called Ford's VF. If actually EF <BR>then solidly =
in=20
the CC, with I think a 20 maybe scraping the=20
bottom?<BR><BR><BR>Clem</FONT></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV></FONT></BODY></HTML>
-------------------------------1141424002--
|
|---|
| Source URL |
|
|---|
| Date published |
|
|---|
| Volume |
|
|---|
