| 文章內容 |
- From njraywms@optonline.net Thu Jun 01 07:04:48 2006
Return-Path: <njraywms@optonline.net>
X-Sender: njraywms@optonline.net
X-Apparently-To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
Received: (qmail 96615 invoked from network); 1 Jun 2006 14:04:29 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.67.34)
by m35.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 1 Jun 2006 14:04:29 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mta1.srv.hcvlny.cv.net) (167.206.4.196)
by mta8.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 1 Jun 2006 14:04:29 -0000
Received: from DIANEJ33YVI95P (ool-4354a75d.dyn.optonline.net [67.84.167.93])
by mta1.srv.hcvlny.cv.net
(Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-6.01 (built Apr 3 2006))
with SMTP id <0J06008N2PPTP9J0@mta1.srv.hcvlny.cv.net> for
colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com; Thu, 01 Jun 2006 10:03:31 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2006 10:07:29 -0400
To: Ray Williams <njraywms@optonline.net>, colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
Message-id: <007501c68584$b814b560$f2fea8c0@DIANEJ33YVI95P>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
Content-type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="Boundary_(ID_ritH/TA2AywDm7akFAr6Cg)"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-priority: Normal
X-Originating-IP: 167.206.4.196
X-eGroups-Msg-Info: 1:12:0:0
From: Ray Williams <njraywms@optonline.net>
Subject: C4 Newsletter and CNL
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=78843690; y=-XgjwjRfZDtS0GTI-KJ734DG6F0-5IS7gTgElR1OrqCh
X-Yahoo-Profile: njray2
--Boundary_(ID_ritH/TA2AywDm7akFAr6Cg)
Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Hi All,
I've read the posts of the last day concerning the content of the C4 Newsletter and the Colonial Newsletter (CNL). Many good points have been brought up here and I appreciate all of them. Both of the editors, Syd Martin for the C4 Newsletter and Gary Trudgen for CNL, are very qualified and have the best interests of the hobby at heart. They are both personal friends of mine. I trust that both will work together and continue to produce quality products.
If you spend a little time reading several issues of C4N and CNL, you can see that there are obvious differences in content. I don't believe that there is a strict definition of precisely what should be in one publication or the other. There is some overlap. I leave it to the judgment of both editors to make these decisions. In my mind, there isn't and shouldn't be a competition here. Both publications are a very important part of my (your) hobby enjoyment.
The important idea that you should walk away with, from all these related posts, is that there is a NEED FOR ARTICLES. There are none too short and none too long. If you have a coin in your collection that has something interesting or unusual, you could provide a picture and a line or two about your observation. The article might be only a couple inches in print, but if you found it interesting, others would too. If you can't take a picture, let me know and we'll get it photographed. Articles come in all sizes and we need all of them. Let the editors judge their merit - don't assume that others aren't interested.
That being said, I hope I've inspired some of you to submit articles to C4N or CNL. If you have an idea for an article and want advice, email the editors and they will be happy to advise and guide you!
--Boundary_(ID_ritH/TA2AywDm7akFAr6Cg)
Content-type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1106" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Hi All,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2> I've read the posts of the last
day concerning the content of the C4 Newsletter and the Colonial Newsletter
(CNL). Many good points have been brought up here and I appreciate all of
them. Both of the editors, Syd Martin for the C4 Newsletter and Gary
Trudgen for CNL, are very qualified and have the best interests of the hobby at
heart. They are both personal friends of mine. I trust that both
will work together and continue to produce quality products. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2> If you spend a little time
reading several issues of C4N and CNL, you can see that there are obvious
differences in content. I don't believe that there is a strict definition
of precisely what should be in one publication or the other. There is some
overlap. I leave it to the judgment of both editors to make these
decisions. In my mind, there isn't and shouldn't be a competition
here. Both publications are a very important part of my (your) hobby
enjoyment. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2> The important idea that you
should walk away with, from all these related posts, is that there is a NEED FOR
ARTICLES. There are none too short and none too long. If you have a
coin in your collection that has something interesting or unusual, you could
provide a picture and a line or two about your observation. The article
might be only a couple inches in print, but if you found it interesting, others
would too. If you can't take a picture, let me know and we'll get it
photographed. Articles come in all sizes and we need all of them.
Let the editors judge their merit - don't assume that others aren't
interested.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2> That being said, I hope I've
inspired some of you to submit articles to C4N or CNL. If you have an idea
for an article and want advice, email the editors and they will be happy to
advise and guide you!</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV></DIV></BODY></HTML>
--Boundary_(ID_ritH/TA2AywDm7akFAr6Cg)--
|
|---|
| 來源網址 |
|
|---|
| 發布日期 |
|
|---|
| 體積 |
|
|---|
