| Artikelinhalt |
- From njraywms@optonline.net Mon Dec 10 16:36:59 2007
Return-Path: <njraywms@optonline.net>
X-Sender: njraywms@optonline.net
X-Apparently-To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
X-Received: (qmail 9001 invoked from network); 11 Dec 2007 00:36:59 -0000
X-Received: from unknown (66.218.67.94)
by m42.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 11 Dec 2007 00:36:59 -0000
X-Received: from unknown (HELO mta2.srv.hcvlny.cv.net) (167.206.4.197)
by mta15.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 11 Dec 2007 00:36:58 -0000
X-Received: from DIANE1FI2X68PX (ool-4354a75d.dyn.optonline.net [67.84.167.93])
by mta2.srv.hcvlny.cv.net
(Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007))
with SMTP id <0JSV00LK30DCR7D0@mta2.srv.hcvlny.cv.net> for
colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com; Mon, 10 Dec 2007 19:36:49 -0500 (EST)
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 19:36:13 -0500
To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
Message-id: <183b01c83b8d$d5743750$f2fea8c0@DIANE1FI2X68PX>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1896
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1807
Content-type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="Boundary_(ID_nbqOL9EFf9NqPbwFqM9p0Q)"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-priority: Normal
References: <001d01c83b79$92e5bb70$5e5f7c18@youramr45pv6hw>
<20071210141316.ik6yb2clldwkocsg@webmail.vectrafitness.com>
<001101c83b7a$f738c1c0$5e5f7c18@youramr45pv6hw>
<20071210143013.ipx1fr0dpbrscw4c@webmail.vectrafitness.com>
<003701c83b7c$889a5ba0$5e5f7c18@youramr45pv6hw>
<17fb01c83b7d$ec4e3bc0$f2fea8c0@DIANE1FI2X68PX>
<004601c83b80$fb2c3450$5e5f7c18@youramr45pv6hw>
<20071210160159.5uc3v4jr2j488kk4@webmail.vectrafitness.com>
X-Originating-IP: 167.206.4.197
X-eGroups-Msg-Info: 1:12:0:0:0
From: Ray Williams <njraywms@optonline.net>
Subject: C4N Format
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=78843690; y=yb7TGqiMuF7dBbf0Kxe4D8BRqgfu3N1OLRKg8w0dJ3VR
X-Yahoo-Profile: njray2
--Boundary_(ID_nbqOL9EFf9NqPbwFqM9p0Q)
Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Marc, Buell and all...
At a C4 meeting a couple years ago, we discussed the advantages and disadvantages of different size and format C4 Newsletters. The present newsletter format was what was voted upon. The advantage of the large loose-leaf format is that we can publish full size plates, the editor can publish the newsletter in page quantities divisible by 2 instead of 4, a chart or page could be photocopied for personal use without distortion, it can be stored in three ring binders, manila folders in a file cabinet or bound into a nice book format. The current size has proven to be advantageous as I don't know how we would have fit all the material into the smaller formats. I do realize that some prefer the smaller stapled format and who knows, maybe we'll change back again in another 10 years... <BG> The C4 officers just want what is most useful to the membership while not too burdensome to the editor, while keeping an eye on the costs.
Thinking of the Mike Hodder years as editor, I cherish those issues and the history of the beginning days of C4. Mike was instrumental in bringing C4 to fruition. The original thoughts was to keep C4 very informal, meeting at national conventions and having a newsletter. C4 has evolved into something larger than originally planned for, but I hope we can always maintain that friendly informal atmosphere. That is a big part of what I like so much about the C4 Conventions. I'm sure that most agree.
Ray
----- Original Message -----
From: buell@vectrafitness.com
To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2007 7:01 PM
Subject: Re: [Colonial Numismatics] 77-dd (C4N)
Marc,
I too prefer the old style, so there are two of us. Actually, the new
style is the old style. I just looked at the first newsletters (the
Hodder era) and they are loose sheets of 8 1/2"x 11" paper too. I think
it was generaally regarded as an improvement when the stapled format
appeared. And now the return to the earlier style is again generally
regarded as an improvement. Can something really be improved twice and
end up as it started?
Maybe the loose leaf style can be bound, but almost no one will have it
done. But it does seem that the majority likes this 'loose sheets of
paper' direction. And after all, it is the content that counts! And
with Syd as editor, the newsletters have been great. I also submitted
articles to Dan Friedus and Angel Pietri when they served as editor.
They too get very high marks in my book! I don't recall submitting
articles to Hodder or others who held the position.
Buell
Quoting marc <marcm@sunflower.com>:
> Thanks, Ray. I found it after I dug out the space heater and drop
> light and checked for gas for the generator. The very next isssue has
> Roger's "Walter Mould's initials covered by sprigs. BTW., I may be
> the only one who feels this way but there is something to be said for
> old format,"I like it"
> Oh Yeah, I found a letter from John Griffee in the same box so I'm
> attaching my AG2 St Pats
> Marc
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Ray Williams
> To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Monday, December 10, 2007 4:42 PM
> Subject: Re: [Colonial Numismatics] 77-dd
>
>
>
> Marc,
> Buell's article on the third ear on the Maris 77-dd III is a
> great piece of detective work. It's worth severa rereads!
> Ray
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: marc
> To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Monday, December 10, 2007 5:32 PM
> Subject: Re: [Colonial Numismatics] 77-dd
>
>
>
> Thanks, Buell. I've been needing to unpack my old journals anyway.
> I'll re-read it.
> Marc
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: buell@vectrafitness.com
> To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Monday, December 10, 2007 4:30 PM
> Subject: Re: [Colonial Numismatics] 77-dd
>
>
> Marc,
> It is in the Fall 2004 issue (v.12, n.3), a stapled issue. Buell
>
> Quoting marc <marcm@sunflower.com>:
>
> > Thanks, Buell. I remember reading your article but never thought of
> > looking on my coin.Did your article appear in the older format
> > journals?
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: buell@vectrafitness.com
> > To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
> > Sent: Monday, December 10, 2007 4:13 PM
> > Subject: Re: [Colonial Numismatics] 77-dd
> >
> >
> > Marc,
> > Third ear by single tree visible!
> > Buell
> >
> > Quoting marc <marcm@sunflower.com>:
> >
> > > How about this one? Btw, I'm just waiting for the huge ice storm to
> > > inch its way to KC. I have a feeling the cable may be down
> for a bit.
> > > Marc
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------
> > This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
>
>
>
>
>
>
----------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
--Boundary_(ID_nbqOL9EFf9NqPbwFqM9p0Q)
Content-type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3c.org/TR/1999/REC-html401-19991224/loose.dtd">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1589" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffffff" bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Marc, Buell and all... </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2> At a C4 meeting a couple years
ago, we discussed the advantages and disadvantages of different size and format
C4 Newsletters. The present newsletter format was what was voted
upon. The advantage of the large loose-leaf format is that we can publish
full size plates, the editor can publish the newsletter in page quantities
divisible by 2 instead of 4, a chart or page could be photocopied for personal
use without distortion, it can be stored in three ring binders, manila folders
in a file cabinet or bound into a nice book format. The current size has
proven to be advantageous as I don't know how we would have fit all the material
into the smaller formats. I do realize that some prefer the smaller
stapled format and who knows, maybe we'll change back again in another 10
years... <BG> The C4 officers just want what is most useful to
the membership while not too burdensome to the editor, while keeping an eye on
the costs. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2> Thinking of the Mike Hodder
years as editor, I cherish those issues and the history of the beginning days of
C4. Mike was instrumental in bringing C4 to fruition. The original
thoughts was to keep C4 very informal, meeting at national conventions and
having a newsletter. C4 has evolved into something larger than originally
planned for, but I hope we can always maintain that friendly informal
atmosphere. That is a big part of what I like so much about the C4
Conventions. I'm sure that most agree.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Ray</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=buell@vectrafitness.com
href="mailto:buell@vectrafitness.com">buell@vectrafitness.com</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A
title=colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
href="mailto:colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com">colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com</A>
</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Monday, December 10, 2007 7:01
PM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [Colonial Numismatics] 77-dd
(C4N)</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV id=ygrp-text>
<P>Marc,<BR>I too prefer the old style, so there are two of us. Actually, the
new <BR>style is the old style. I just looked at the first newsletters (the
<BR>Hodder era) and they are loose sheets of 8 1/2"x 11" paper too. I think
<BR>it was generaally regarded as an improvement when the stapled format
<BR>appeared. And now the return to the earlier style is again generally
<BR>regarded as an improvement. Can something really be improved twice and
<BR>end up as it started?<BR><BR>Maybe the loose leaf style can be bound, but
almost no one will have it <BR>done. But it does seem that the majority likes
this 'loose sheets of <BR>paper' direction. And after all, it is the content
that counts! And <BR>with Syd as editor, the newsletters have been great. I
also submitted <BR>articles to Dan Friedus and Angel Pietri when they served
as editor. <BR>They too get very high marks in my book! I don't recall
submitting <BR>articles to Hodder or others who held the
position.<BR>Buell<BR><BR>Quoting marc <<A
href="mailto:marcm%40sunflower.com">marcm@sunflower.<WBR>com</A>>:<BR><BR>>
Thanks, Ray. I found it after I dug out the space heater and drop <BR>>
light and checked for gas for the generator. The very next isssue has <BR>>
Roger's "Walter Mould's initials covered by sprigs. BTW., I may be <BR>>
the only one who feels this way but there is something to be said for <BR>>
old format,"I like it"<BR>> Oh Yeah, I found a letter from John Griffee in
the same box so I'm <BR>> attaching my AG2 St Pats<BR>> Marc<BR>>
----- Original Message -----<BR>> From: Ray Williams<BR>> To: <A
href="mailto:colonial-coins%40yahoogroups.com">colonial-coins@<WBR>yahoogroups.<WBR>com</A><BR>>
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2007 4:42 PM<BR>> Subject: Re: [Colonial
Numismatics] 77-dd<BR>><BR>><BR>><BR>> Marc,<BR>> Buell's
article on the third ear on the Maris 77-dd III is a <BR>> great piece of
detective work. It's worth severa rereads!<BR>> Ray<BR>><BR>><BR>>
----- Original Message -----<BR>> From: marc<BR>> To: <A
href="mailto:colonial-coins%40yahoogroups.com">colonial-coins@<WBR>yahoogroups.<WBR>com</A><BR>>
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2007 5:32 PM<BR>> Subject: Re: [Colonial
Numismatics] 77-dd<BR>><BR>><BR>><BR>> Thanks, Buell. I've been
needing to unpack my old journals anyway. <BR>> I'll re-read it.<BR>>
Marc<BR>> ----- Original Message -----<BR>> From: <A
href="mailto:buell%40vectrafitness.com">buell@vectrafitness<WBR>.com</A><BR>>
To: <A
href="mailto:colonial-coins%40yahoogroups.com">colonial-coins@<WBR>yahoogroups.<WBR>com</A><BR>>
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2007 4:30 PM<BR>> Subject: Re: [Colonial
Numismatics] 77-dd<BR>><BR>><BR>> Marc,<BR>> It is in the Fall
2004 issue (v.12, n.3), a stapled issue. Buell<BR>><BR>> Quoting marc
<<A
href="mailto:marcm%40sunflower.com">marcm@sunflower.<WBR>com</A>>:<BR>><BR>>
> Thanks, Buell. I remember reading your article but never thought
of<BR>> > looking on my coin.Did your article appear in the older
format<BR>> > journals?<BR>> > ----- Original Message
-----<BR>> > From: <A
href="mailto:buell%40vectrafitness.com">buell@vectrafitness<WBR>.com</A><BR>>
> To: <A
href="mailto:colonial-coins%40yahoogroups.com">colonial-coins@<WBR>yahoogroups.<WBR>com</A><BR>>
> Sent: Monday, December 10, 2007 4:13 PM<BR>> > Subject: Re:
[Colonial Numismatics] 77-dd<BR>> ><BR>> ><BR>> >
Marc,<BR>> > Third ear by single tree visible!<BR>> >
Buell<BR>> ><BR>> > Quoting marc <<A
href="mailto:marcm%40sunflower.com">marcm@sunflower.<WBR>com</A>>:<BR>>
><BR>> > > How about this one? Btw, I'm just waiting for the huge
ice storm to<BR>> > > inch its way to KC. I have a feeling the cable
may be down <BR>> for a bit.<BR>> > > Marc<BR>> ><BR>>
>
------------<WBR>---------<WBR>---------<WBR>---------<WBR>---------<WBR>---------<WBR>-<BR>>
> This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.<BR>>
><BR>> ><BR>> ><BR>> ><BR>><BR>>
------------<WBR>---------<WBR>---------<WBR>---------<WBR>---------<WBR>---------<WBR>-<BR>>
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging
Program.<BR>><BR>><BR>><BR>><BR>><BR>><BR><BR>------------<WBR>---------<WBR>---------<WBR>---------<WBR>---------<WBR>---------<WBR>-<BR>This
message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.<BR><BR></P></DIV><!--End group email --></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
--Boundary_(ID_nbqOL9EFf9NqPbwFqM9p0Q)--
|
|---|
