[Colonial Numismatics] Wood 33 = English Evasion - Resend of Prior Msg, J Howes Pubblico Deposited

Re

Contenuto dell'articolo
  • From jlorenzo@ob.ilww.com Tue Jan 22 10:08:14 2008
    Return-Path: <jlorenzo@ob.ilww.com>
    X-Sender: jlorenzo@ob.ilww.com
    X-Apparently-To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
    X-Received: (qmail 24857 invoked from network); 22 Jan 2008 18:08:13 -0000
    X-Received: from unknown (66.218.67.94)
    by m50.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 22 Jan 2008 18:08:13 -0000
    X-Received: from unknown (HELO n40d.bullet.mail.sp1.yahoo.com) (66.163.169.146)
    by mta15.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 22 Jan 2008 18:08:13 -0000
    X-Received: from [216.252.122.217] by n40.bullet.mail.sp1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 22 Jan 2008 18:08:13 -0000
    X-Received: from [66.218.69.1] by t2.bullet.sp1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 22 Jan 2008 18:08:13 -0000
    X-Received: from [66.218.66.75] by t1.bullet.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 22 Jan 2008 18:08:13 -0000
    Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 18:08:12 -0000
    To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
    Message-ID: <fn5bec+25hn@eGroups.com>
    In-Reply-To: <195136.79939.qm@web50805.mail.re2.yahoo.com>
    User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82
    MIME-Version: 1.0
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
    X-Mailer: Yahoo Groups Message Poster
    X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: groups-compose
    X-Originating-IP: 66.163.169.146
    X-eGroups-Msg-Info: 1:6:0:0:0
    X-Yahoo-Post-IP: 65.164.33.248
    From: "John Lorenzo" <jlorenzo@ob.ilww.com>
    Subject: Re: [Colonial Numismatics] Wood 33 = English Evasion - Resend of Prior Msg, J Howes
    X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=74013914; y=giXegf2x2MyVbvi9P-AnnWW13v0OxDX-yuEcN5QU7gvxrn79Zs3qep23Ow
    X-Yahoo-Profile: colonial_john_c4

    People were using the term "Pennsylvanai Bungtowns" in the 70's ...=20
    what were they thinking around the 1910 era <BG>.


    --- In colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com, B B <rlbcomuser@...> wrote:
    >
    > Don't know if these will help, but at a slight angle
    > these images are a little more pronounced. I also
    > believe the R punch was at an angle and runs into the
    > base of the T. Also, there is some evidence, as
    > Morris mentioned He'd discuss further, the obverse
    > leend being GEO and not GLO.
    >=20
    > I think what may bs a reason HW included them in the
    > Blacksmith listing is the uniformity of the blanks.=20
    > They are quite decent copper and look similar to the
    > wood 1-18 series from that perspective. This point
    > could also be made of a lot of other evasions if you
    > would get a number of them together and view good
    > grade examples. The liklihood is that Wood didn't see
    > that with the evasions, but because the Wood 33s were
    > very prediminant in early collections in North America
    > it appeared they belonged to the Blacksmith series.=20
    > Still need to know why they were here and not in
    > England,/Birmingham where they were likely produced.
    >=20
    > BB
    > --- "j.howes" <j.howes@...> wrote:
    >=20
    > >=20
    > > Hey Clem,
    > >=20
    > > I would not lose any sleep over it maybe BB will
    > > post some images tomorrow. See attached!
    > >=20
    > >=20
    > >=20
    > > ----- Original Message -----=20
    > > From: Clement V. Schettino=20
    > > To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com=20
    > > Sent: Monday, January 21, 2008 3:29 PM
    > > Subject: RE: [Colonial Numismatics] Wood 33 =3D
    > > English Evasion - Resend of Prior Msg
    > >=20
    > >=20
    > >=20
    > > Hey Ray,
    > >=20
    > >=20
    > >=20
    > > First of all I don't think the counterfeiters were
    > > "big" on spacing ;-) but you inadvertently opened my
    > > eyes to another possibility I hadn't considered.
    > > Maybe the R was placed at a bit of an angle when
    > > punched causing it only to have been partly visible
    > > to begin with.
    > >=20
    > >=20
    > >=20
    > > BTW, I sincerely apologize that I will not be
    > > posting the full image, nor will you see it posted
    > > here.=20
    > >=20
    > >=20
    > >=20
    > > I am very sorry and surely didn't mean to start
    > > something I couldn't finish; this did not even
    > > remotely come to mind. Fortunately in my stupidity I
    > > did the wrong thing and posted the important bit. I
    > > was just informed that the owner of the image I
    > > spoke of does NOT want his images posted here. I'm
    > > already in enough trouble with some people here
    > > because I don't seem to express myself properly so
    > > I'll say nothing more on this matter except I'm
    > > sorry.
    > >=20
    > >=20
    > >=20
    > > Next topic.
    > >=20
    > >=20
    > >=20
    > > Clem
    > >=20
    > >=20
    > >=20
    > >=20
    > >
    > -------------------------------------------------------------------
    -----------
    > >=20
    > > From: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
    > > [mailto:colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of
    > > Ray Williams
    > > Sent: Monday, January 21, 2008 2:46 PM
    > > To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
    > > Subject: Re: [Colonial Numismatics] Wood 33 =3D
    > > English Evasion - Resend of Prior Msg
    > >=20
    > >=20
    > >=20
    > > Clem,
    > >=20
    > > The right leg of the R doesn't have enough
    > > room to fit with the next letter so close, but it
    > > does look like an R...
    > >=20
    > > Ray
    > >=20
    > > ----- Original Message -----=20
    > >=20
    > > From: Oliver D. Hoover=20
    > >=20
    > > To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com=20
    > >=20
    > > Sent: Monday, January 21, 2008 2:13 PM
    > >=20
    > > Subject: Re: [Colonial Numismatics] Wood 33 =3D
    > > English Evasion - Resend of Prior Msg
    > >=20
    > >=20
    > >=20
    > > Thanks Clem. This is precisely my point.=20=20
    > >=20
    > >=20
    > >=20
    > > Oliver
    > >=20
    > >=20
    > >=20
    > > On 21-Jan-08, at 2:10 PM, Clement V. Schettino
    > > wrote:
    > >=20
    > >=20
    > >=20
    > >=20
    > >=20
    > > I guess before we all go much further I will
    > > post what I have, partially. I'll leave the full
    > > post to the owner who must not be by his computer as
    > > I'm sure he would share this image with us all for
    > > the sake of numismatics.
    > >=20
    > > These pieces of the image is the best I know how
    > > to do. They should come across well enough to zoom
    > > in on closer.
    > >=20
    > > Clem
    > >=20
    > >=20
    > >
    > -------------------------------------------------------------------
    ---------
    > >=20
    > > From: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
    > > [mailto:colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of
    > > Morris Hankins
    > > Sent: Monday, January 21, 2008 1:39 PM
    > > To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
    > > Subject: Re: [Colonial Numismatics] Wood 33 =3D
    > > English Evasion - Resend of Prior Msg
    > >=20
    > > Oliver, Tonight I will send pics and
    > > explanations again on why the reverse is BTITI and
    > > not BRTIT or BITIT. Also an explanation on why not
    > > an R or P. These will include photos of your coin
    > > as well as JPL's coins.
    > >=20
    > > Morris
    > >=20
    > > "Oliver D. Hoover" <oliver.hoover@...>
    > > wrote:
    > >=20
    > > It should be BRITI.=20
    > >=20
    > > Oliver
    > >=20
    > > On 21-Jan-08, at 1:24 PM, Dan Burleson wrote:
    > >=20
    > >=20
    > >=20
    > >=20
    > >=20
    > >=20
    > > Why is it B R T I T and not B R I T I.? I have
    > > one that seems to show a triangle right and half way
    > > up of the fourth letter and appears to be part of a
    > > T. I would think the I's would have bases.
    > >=20
    > > Dan
    > >=20
    > > John Lorenzo wrote:=20
    > >=20
    > > Look first for the presence of die polishing
    > > lines on the tops of=20
    > > the letters ... then proceed to your
    > > interpretation of BRITAIN. If=20
    > > the die polishing lines are not present with a
    > > loop it may either be=20
    > > another die (i.e., we would expect more than
    > > one die marriage=20
    > > marriage here - particularly after the
    > > situation when Ringo try to=20
    > > sell me 150 W33 examples in one transaction in
    > > the 90's which=20
    > > eventaully went to a Maine Collector) or the
    > > grade may not be high=20
    > > enough on the correct die to see the faint
    > > images to complete the=20
    > > word BRTIT. Keep digging ... on the most
    > > common R1 Evasion. In may=20
    > > be that this is the only R1 Evasion known ...
    > > right Morris?=20
    > >=20
    > > --- In colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com,
    > > "j.howes" <j.howes@> wrote:
    > > >
    > > >=20
    > > > I don't see any indication of an R. So, I
    > > would like to see=20
    > > somone post an=20
    > > > image that shows an early die state.
    > > >=20
    > > >=20
    > > >=20
    > > > ----- Original Message -----=20
    > > > From: "Oliver D. Hoover" <oliver.hoover@>
    > > > To: <colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com>
    > > > Sent: Monday, January 21, 2008 11:36 AM
    > > > Subject: Re: [Colonial Numismatics] Wood 33
    > > =3D English Evasion
    > > >=20
    > > >=20
    > > > You can make out the slight tail of the R on
    > > my=20
    > =3D=3D=3D message truncated =3D=3D=3D
    >=20
    >=20
    >=20
    >=20=20=20=20=20=20=20
    _____________________________________________________________________
    _______________
    > Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page.=20
    > http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
    >


URL di origine Data di pubblicazione
  • 2008-01-22
Volume
  • 1

Le relazioni