[Colonial Numismatics] William III Halpence observations Public Deposited

Re

Article content
  • From taxi_steve929@yahoo.com Thu May 21 03:24:58 2009
    Return-Path: <taxi_steve929@yahoo.com>
    X-Sender: taxi_steve929@yahoo.com
    X-Apparently-To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
    X-Received: (qmail 5634 invoked from network); 21 May 2009 10:24:50 -0000
    X-Received: from unknown (69.147.108.200)
    by m3.grp.re1.yahoo.com with QMQP; 21 May 2009 10:24:50 -0000
    X-Received: from unknown (HELO web84408.mail.ac2.yahoo.com) (68.180.158.104)
    by mta1.grp.re1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 21 May 2009 10:24:50 -0000
    X-Received: (qmail 65781 invoked by uid 60001); 21 May 2009 10:23:47 -0000
    Message-ID: <782425.62478.qm@web84408.mail.ac2.yahoo.com>
    X-YMail-OSG: S7Y1JMsVM1mZst1fhCuC8bQt3QLcU78ejSurT0dtNZcd1ajuICaysmAkCG1AdzThMFJKnT8_HikzeCt7e2MjS.vFuOHwfyEyn8509AKIg7v5c_TFMlHbmJhz9OBpnGmXnIdIWgmVSGzck3BQllf2d7nVBuEhFR8gh4N.78AzCERQPjFwZFkosJMcZyv6S5dQBByxgcZ2IfMTYDu1868Ii5dwqTHx2Gg_iYwN5R0No9aQ24ZyjAvSqFKnW3.bQwtp3HxfCOcUnLJPvKC1bT4uV4P_b4mf3jRxCM25b7CCJUaoivfLnc25D5rNIXSsCb9zdHrNfoSmn713Sy_KXCsf
    X-Received: from [173.54.73.234] by web84408.mail.ac2.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 21 May 2009 03:23:47 PDT
    X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/1277.35 YahooMailWebService/0.7.289.1
    References: <C00932C4F88549FFB820D16BBA7AF4B1@DonPC> <SNT105-W644A36C168CCC9480F96E4AE5B0@phx.gbl> <891725.85236.qm@web84412.mail.ac2.yahoo.com> <SNT105-W5106949C6BACCFB5ACB9CDAE580@phx.gbl> <D721B4AC35F64282A111C6D0A1E76DC2@DonPC>
    Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 03:23:47 -0700 (PDT)
    To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
    In-Reply-To: <D721B4AC35F64282A111C6D0A1E76DC2@DonPC>
    MIME-Version: 1.0
    Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-2074297317-1242901427=:62478"
    X-Originating-IP: 68.180.158.104
    X-eGroups-Msg-Info: 1:12:0:0:0
    From: Steve Frank <taxi_steve929@yahoo.com>
    Subject: Re: [Colonial Numismatics] William III Halpence observations
    X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=143463627; y=cJ1hZwOGfqHC29v3sl9pttXjbWhkI2Ramj4lZ5yksPSLvzaHUNPnWQ
    X-Yahoo-Profile: taxi_steve929

    --0-2074297317-1242901427=:62478
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

    I'm sorry to hear about the crash Don. Several others, myself included, kno=
    w the feeling. you were smart enough to make periodic backups of your work,=
    and I hope of any photo files. I lost several years of counterfeit photo f=
    iles and it was disheartening. One of the few things I ever did that was or=
    ganized, and I neglected to follow through with the important final task of=
    backing up those files. I should have known better and saw it the same as=
    =A0a house fire. "It will never happen to me". It was a case of stupidity a=
    nd laziness on my part as opposed to ignorance or true time constraints. If=
    you do a lot of important work, you should run daily backups. If you do a =
    lot of non-essential work, like I was, but importatant none the less, weekl=
    y or bi-weekly backups should be run.=A0When that crash occurs, and I now h=
    ave the attitude of when instead of if, I will only lose a minimal amout of=
    work.

    I think I just hit on something!! If everyone=A0keeps the attitude "When th=
    e next crash occurs" insead of=A0"If a crash occurs"=A0we will be better pr=
    epared for it. In my mainframe days, I had to write programs to periodiclly=
    clean up our IMS databases, as they would eventually grow to monsterous si=
    zes and slow down the online and batch runs. We also had disaster recovery =
    drills every=A0few of months and have to recover all of the databases and g=
    et the system up nationwide in an alloted time. These tests were incase of =
    such things as nuclear attack, and working for an insurance company we used=
    to joke that in case of nuclear attack, the last thing we would worry abou=
    t was recovering Continental Insurance company files. We were able to joke =
    about it in the early and mid 80's, but today I would imagine that when peo=
    ple for these companies run a disaster recovery, it takes on a truer meanin=
    g than we knew would ever exist. Not a question of if, but when.=20




    ________________________________
    From: Don H <slospokes2@comcast.net>
    To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
    Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2009 7:09:57 PM
    Subject: Re: [Colonial Numismatics] William III Halpence observations





    Mike,=A0funny you mentioned your lighter one registering lower; the one I f=
    ound the other day appears cast, according to my son, but I just weighed it=
    in at 110.5 grains and that is way below my average for the ground founds.=
    BUT, it registers very high on my Explorer, so you just never know.... :>)
    =A0
    Going to do a seperate post with my weights on my 19 Williams, not sure any=
    more how many are possible counterfeits, but believe the vast majority are =
    not.=A0 (most weigh in the 130's, with one at least at 154 gns.
    =A0
    When my computer crashed last month (permantly) I lost some data I had on t=
    hem, especially from my son, but will eventually get all the information re=
    loaded into the new computer.=A0 Also lost some of my more recent inputs to=
    the NJ survey, but that is not recoverable. :<(
    =A0
    =A0
    Don
    =A0
    =A0
    =A0
    ----- Original Message -----=20
    From: Mike Reynolds=20
    To: colonial-coins@ yahoogroups. com=20
    Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2009 3:54 PM
    Subject: RE: [Colonial Numismatics] William III Halpence observations [2 At=
    tachments]

    Steve,
    Here are 3 dug, worn out, Wm III 1/2 D.=A02 of them register similarly on m=
    y metal detector, roughly at 70 on the meter and weigh roughly the same, at=
    around 130 gn. The other is much lighter and registers at around 50 on the=
    detector. I think this one was cast.=20
    =A0
    Don,
    =A0Do you use a Whites and if=A0so can you tell me where Wm III 1/2 D usual=
    ly register at on your detector?=A0 Thanks.
    =A0
    Mike=A0=A0

    ________________________________
    To: colonial-coins@ yahoogroups. com
    From: taxi_steve929@ yahoo.com
    Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 10:24:49 -0700
    Subject: Re: [Colonial Numismatics] William III Halpence observations [2 At=
    tachments]


    [Attachment(s) from Steve Frank included below]=20


    Here is a cast william III type 2, over 162 grains...and the other two coin=
    s are GII's...1752 on left and 1743...believe both to be lightweight cast..=
    .1752 is a question mark. 1752 weighs 95.7 grains, and the 1743 is only 93.=
    3 grains. Copper was pretty cheap, so they could have made them at full wei=
    ght and still made money...

    i can't find it, but somewhere I have a real monster cast gII...can't remem=
    ber the weight, but it's as heavy as the William III!!




    ________________________________
    From: Mike Reynolds <agelessness@ hotmail.com>
    To: colonial-coins@ yahoogroups. com
    Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2009 9:21:21 AM
    Subject: RE: [Colonial Numismatics] William III Halpence observations [2 At=
    tachments]


    Don,
    I also get more G IIs than WM IIIs or G IIIs. Here is a WM III dug from Mar=
    blehead MA. Most of the coppers dug from that area,=A0unfortunately, look l=
    ike they have been cooking=A0in acid soup for a couple of centuries.=A0=20
    =A0
    Mike

    ________________________________
    To: colonial-coins@ yahoogroups. com
    From: slospokes2@comcast. net
    Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 08:19:03 -0400
    Subject: [Colonial Numismatics] William III Halpence observations [2 Attach=
    ments]


    [Attachment(s) from Don H included below]=20


    Being a "metal detectorist" as Steve would say :>)=A0;=A0 over the years of=
    finding coppers, the William III Halfpenny has amazed me on how they circu=
    lated so long and that they almost always developed the same wear character=
    istics.
    =A0
    I know Wayne Shelby has quite a few and I have not collaberated with him on=
    the condition of his, but between the ones I have (19) and my son's finds =
    (around 10 I believe) they all have basically the same wear pattern.=A0=A0=
    =20
    =A0
    The Reverse on the vast majority of the ones found in the ground are worn s=
    mooth. To find one with any detail left on the reverse is not the norm for =
    the ones I have found and seen posted on metal detecting forums.=A0 But the=
    Obverse always seems to have at least the telltale ribbons showing and at =
    worst the outline of the left side of the bust.
    =A0
    I found one yesterday and almost immediately, even in the uncleaned state i=
    t was in, knew it was a William III Halfpenny.=A0 This one was a tad better=
    than most of my others, this one lettering on the right hand obverse side =
    were readable.=A0=A0=A0=20
    =A0
    The William III Halfpenny must have been the most common copper used for th=
    e longest period of time by the colonists and some I am sure survived into =
    the Federation period=A0 of coinage.=A0=A0 I have found by far more William=
    III Halfpence than King George I Halfpence, but do think the King George I=
    I Halfpence was perhaps the most common copper that circulated in America.=
    =A0 Some might think the KGIII Halfpence, but my data and Wayne Shelby's da=
    ta points to KGII being found more often.
    =A0
    The coin I found yesterday, probably was lost in the late mid 1770's, based=
    on the history of the site (a sawmill that was abandoned around Rev War ti=
    me frame) and the other artifacts found with it. (2nd photo).=A0=A0
    =A0
    Assuming a lost time of 1770s, this coin was in circulation of 70 years or =
    so, perhaps as little as 50 but I would lean more towards being lost during=
    the time of the operation of the sawmill.
    =A0
    OK,=A0 end of my observations for the day. :>)
    =A0
    =A0
    Oh, my C4 newsletter arrived on Saturday (Southern NJ)
    =A0
    Don




    --0-2074297317-1242901427=:62478
    Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

    <html><head><style type=3D"text/css"><!-- DIV {margin:0px;} --></style></he=
    ad><body><div style=3D"font-family:times new roman, new york, times, serif;=
    font-size:14pt"><DIV>I'm sorry to hear about the crash Don. Several others,=
    myself included, know the feeling. you were smart enough to make periodic =
    backups of your work, and I hope of any photo files. I lost several years o=
    f counterfeit photo files and it was disheartening. One of the few things I=
    ever did that was organized, and I neglected to follow through with the im=
    portant final task of backing up those files. I should have known better an=
    d saw it the same as a house fire. "It will never happen to me". It wa=
    s a case of stupidity and laziness on my part as opposed to ignorance or tr=
    ue time constraints. If you do a lot of important work, you should run dail=
    y backups. If you do a lot of non-essential work, like I was, but importata=
    nt none the less, weekly or bi-weekly backups should be run. When
    that crash occurs, and I now have the attitude of when instead of if, I wi=
    ll only lose a minimal amout of work.</DIV>
    <DIV> </DIV>
    <DIV>I think I just hit on something!! If everyone keeps the attitude =
    "When the next crash occurs" insead of "If a crash occurs" we wil=
    l be better prepared for it. In my mainframe days, I had to write programs =
    to periodiclly clean up our IMS databases, as they would eventually grow to=
    monsterous sizes and slow down the online and batch runs. We also had disa=
    ster recovery drills every few of months and have to recover all of th=
    e databases and get the system up nationwide in an alloted time. These test=
    s were incase of such things as nuclear attack, and working for an insuranc=
    e company we used to joke that in case of nuclear attack, the last thing we=
    would worry about was recovering Continental Insurance company files. We w=
    ere able to joke about it in the early and mid 80's, but today I would imag=
    ine that when people for these companies run a disaster recovery, it takes =
    on a truer meaning than we knew would ever exist. Not a question of
    if, but when. <BR></DIV>
    <DIV style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 14pt; FONT-FAMILY: times new roman, new york, time=
    s, serif"><BR>
    <DIV style=3D"PADDING-LEFT: 5px; FONT-SIZE: 12pt; MARGIN: 5px 0px 5px 5px; =
    BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid; FONT-FAMILY: times new roman, new york, tim=
    es, serif"><FONT face=3DTahoma size=3D2>
    <HR SIZE=3D1>
    <B><SPAN style=3D"FONT-WEIGHT: bold">From:</SPAN></B> Don H <slospokes2@=
    comcast.net><BR><B><SPAN style=3D"FONT-WEIGHT: bold">To:</SPAN></B> colo=
    nial-coins@yahoogroups.com<BR><B><SPAN style=3D"FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Sent:</S=
    PAN></B> Wednesday, May 20, 2009 7:09:57 PM<BR><B><SPAN style=3D"FONT-WEIGH=
    T: bold">Subject:</SPAN></B> Re: [Colonial Numismatics] William III Halpenc=
    e observations<BR></FONT><BR>
    <DIV id=3Dygrp-text>
    <P>
    <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Mike, funny you mentioned your lighte=
    r one registering lower; the one I found the other day appears cast, accord=
    ing to my son, but I just weighed it in at 110.5 grains and that is way bel=
    ow my average for the ground founds. BUT, it registers very high on my Expl=
    orer, so you just never know.... :>)</FONT></DIV>
    <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
    <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Going to do a seperate post with my weight=
    s on my 19 Williams, not sure anymore how many are possible counterfeits, b=
    ut believe the vast majority are not.  (most weigh in the 130's, with =
    one at least at 154 gns.</FONT></DIV>
    <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
    <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>When my computer crashed last month (perma=
    ntly) I lost some data I had on them, especially from my son, but will even=
    tually get all the information reloaded into the new computer.  Also l=
    ost some of my more recent inputs to the NJ survey, but that is not recover=
    able. :<(</FONT></DIV>
    <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
    <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
    <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Don</FONT></DIV>
    <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
    <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
    <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
    <BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr style=3D"BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid">
    <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
    <DIV style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial"><B>From:</B> <A title=
    =3Dagelessness@hotmail.com href=3D"mailto:agelessness@hotmail.com" target=
    =3D_blank rel=3Dnofollow ymailto=3D"mailto:agelessness@hotmail.com">Mike Re=
    ynolds</A> </DIV>
    <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A title=3Dcolonial-coins@yahoog=
    roups.com href=3D"mailto:colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com" target=3D_blank re=
    l=3Dnofollow ymailto=3D"mailto:colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com">colonial-coi=
    ns@ yahoogroups. com</A> </DIV>
    <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Wednesday, May 20, 2009 3:54 P=
    M</DIV>
    <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> RE: [Colonial Numismatics] =
    William III Halpence observations [2 Attachments]</DIV>
    <DIV><BR></DIV>
    <DIV id=3Dygrp-text>
    <P>Steve,<BR>Here are 3 dug, worn out, Wm III 1/2 D. 2 of them registe=
    r similarly on my metal detector, roughly at 70 on the meter and weigh roug=
    hly the same, at around 130 gn. The other is much lighter and registers at =
    around 50 on the detector. I think this one was cast. <BR> <BR>Don,<BR=
    > Do you use a Whites and if so can you tell me where Wm III 1/2 =
    D usually register at on your detector?  Thanks.<BR> <BR>Mike&nbs=
    p; <BR>
    <HR id=3DstopSpelling>
    To: colonial-coins@ yahoogroups. com<BR>From: taxi_steve929@ yahoo.com<BR>D=
    ate: Tue, 19 May 2009 10:24:49 -0700<BR>Subject: Re: [Colonial Numismatics]=
    William III Halpence observations [2 Attachments]<BR><BR>
    <DIV id=3DEC_ygrp-mlmsg>
    <DIV id=3DEC_ygrp-msg>
    <DIV id=3DEC_ygrp-text><SPAN style=3D"FONT-WEIGHT: bold; FONT-SIZE: 12px">[=
    <A style=3D"TEXT-DECORATION: none" href=3D"http://sn105w.snt105.mail.live.c=
    om/mail/EditMessageLight.aspx?ReadMessageId=3Db4c16542-db44-4989-b154-75ba5=
    00e915f&FolderID=3D00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000001&CP=3D-1&=
    ;n=3D1090304155&Action=3DReply&AllowUnsafe=3DFalse#TopText" target=
    =3D_blank rel=3Dnofollow>Attachment(s)</A> from Steve Frank included below]=
    </SPAN> <BR><BR>
    <DIV style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 14pt; FONT-FAMILY: times new roman, new york, time=
    s, serif">
    <DIV>Here is a cast william III type 2, over 162 grains...and the other two=
    coins are GII's...1752 on left and 1743...believe both to be lightweight c=
    ast...1752 is a question mark. 1752 weighs 95.7 grains, and the 1743 is onl=
    y 93.3 grains. Copper was pretty cheap, so they could have made them at ful=
    l weight and still made money...</DIV>
    <DIV> </DIV>
    <DIV>i can't find it, but somewhere I have a real monster cast gII...can't =
    remember the weight, but it's as heavy as the William III!!<BR></DIV>
    <DIV style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 14pt; FONT-FAMILY: times new roman, new york, time=
    s, serif"><BR>
    <DIV style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 12pt; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid; FONT-FAMILY:=
    times new roman, new york, times, serif"><FONT face=3DTahoma size=3D2>
    <HR SIZE=3D1>
    <B><SPAN style=3D"FONT-WEIGHT: bold">From:</SPAN></B> Mike Reynolds <age=
    lessness@ hotmail.com><BR><B><SPAN style=3D"FONT-WEIGHT: bold">To:</SPAN=
    ></B> colonial-coins@ yahoogroups. com<BR><B><SPAN style=3D"FONT-WEIGHT: bo=
    ld">Sent:</SPAN></B> Tuesday, May 19, 2009 9:21:21 AM<BR><B><SPAN style=3D"=
    FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Subject:</SPAN></B> RE: [Colonial Numismatics] William I=
    II Halpence observations [2 Attachments]<BR></FONT><BR>
    <DIV id=3DEC_ygrp-text>
    <P>Don,<BR>I also get more G IIs than WM IIIs or G IIIs. Here is a WM III d=
    ug from Marblehead MA. Most of the coppers dug from that area, unfortu=
    nately, look like they have been cooking in acid soup for a couple of =
    centuries.  <BR> <BR>Mike<BR>
    <HR id=3DEC_stopSpelling>
    To: colonial-coins@ yahoogroups. com<BR>From: slospokes2@comcast. net<BR>Da=
    te: Tue, 19 May 2009 08:19:03 -0400<BR>Subject: [Colonial Numismatics] Will=
    iam III Halpence observations [2 Attachments]<BR><BR>
    <DIV id=3DEC_EC_ygrp-mlmsg>
    <DIV id=3DEC_EC_ygrp-msg>
    <DIV id=3DEC_EC_ygrp-text><SPAN style=3D"FONT-WEIGHT: bold; FONT-SIZE: 12px=
    ">[<A style=3D"TEXT-DECORATION: none" href=3D"http://sn105w.snt105.mail.liv=
    e.com/mail/EditMessageLight.aspx?ReadMessageId=3D39cf328d-c271-48a9-8b02-2c=
    4559cc4d05&FolderID=3D00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000001&CP=3D-1&=
    amp;n=3D338952088&Action=3DReply&AllowUnsafe=3DFalse#TopText" targe=
    t=3D_blank rel=3Dnofollow>Attachment(s)</A> from Don H included below]</SPA=
    N> <BR><BR>
    <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Being a "metal detectorist" as Steve would=
    say :>) ;  over the years of finding coppers, the William III=
    Halfpenny has amazed me on how they circulated so long and that they almos=
    t always developed the same wear characteristics.</FONT></DIV>
    <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
    <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I know Wayne Shelby has quite a few and I =
    have not collaberated with him on the condition of his, but between the one=
    s I have (19) and my son's finds (around 10 I believe) they all have basica=
    lly the same wear pattern.   </FONT></DIV>
    <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
    <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>The Reverse on the vast majority of the on=
    es found in the ground are worn smooth. To find one with any detail left on=
    the reverse is not the norm for the ones I have found and seen posted on m=
    etal detecting forums.  But the Obverse always seems to have at least =
    the telltale ribbons showing and at worst the outline of the left side of t=
    he bust.</FONT></DIV>
    <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
    <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I found one yesterday and almost immediate=
    ly, even in the uncleaned state it was in, knew it was a William III Halfpe=
    nny.  This one was a tad better than most of my others, this one lette=
    ring on the right hand obverse side were readable.    </FONT=
    ></DIV>
    <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
    <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>The William III Halfpenny must have been t=
    he most common copper used for the longest period of time by the colonists =
    and some I am sure survived into the Federation period  of coinage.&nb=
    sp;  I have found by far more William III Halfpence than King George I=
    Halfpence, but do think the King George II Halfpence was perhaps the most =
    common copper that circulated in America.  Some might think the KGIII =
    Halfpence, but my data and Wayne Shelby's data points to KGII being found m=
    ore often.</FONT></DIV>
    <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
    <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>The coin I found yesterday, probably was l=
    ost in the late mid 1770's, based on the history of the site (a sawmill tha=
    t was abandoned around Rev War time frame) and the other artifacts found wi=
    th it. (2nd photo).  </FONT></DIV>
    <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
    <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Assuming a lost time of 1770s, this coin w=
    as in circulation of 70 years or so, perhaps as little as 50 but I would le=
    an more towards being lost during the time of the operation of the sawmill.=
    </FONT></DIV>
    <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
    <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>OK,  end of my observations for the d=
    ay. :>)</FONT></DIV>
    <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
    <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
    <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Oh, my C4 newsletter arrived on Saturday (=
    Southern NJ)</FONT></DIV>
    <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
    <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Don</FONT></DIV>
    <P><BR><BR></P></DIV>
    <DIV style=3D"COLOR: white"></DIV></DIV></DIV></DIV></DIV></DIV></DIV><BR><=
    /DIV>
    <DIV style=3D"COLOR: white"></DIV></DIV></DIV>
    <P></P></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV></DIV></DIV></div></body></html>
    --0-2074297317-1242901427=:62478--
Source URL Date published
  • 2009-05-21
Volume
  • 1

Relationships

NNP Author