[Colonial Numismatics] Why progress sucks! Pubblico Deposited
Re
- From CMcdon0923@aol.com Tue Feb 23 18:07:19 2010
Return-Path: <CMcdon0923@aol.com>
X-Sender: CMcdon0923@aol.com
X-Apparently-To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
X-Received: (qmail 87103 invoked from network); 24 Feb 2010 02:07:19 -0000
X-Received: from unknown (66.196.94.106)
by m1.grp.sp2.yahoo.com with QMQP; 24 Feb 2010 02:07:19 -0000
X-Received: from unknown (HELO imr-ma05.mx.aol.com) (64.12.100.31)
by mta2.grp.re1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 24 Feb 2010 02:07:19 -0000
X-Received: from imo-da02.mx.aol.com (imo-da02.mx.aol.com [205.188.169.200])
by imr-ma05.mx.aol.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id o1O27Agi018195
for <colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com>; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 21:07:10 -0500
X-Received: from CMcdon0923@aol.com
by imo-da02.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v42.9.) id r.c9f.638e6318 (43890)
for <colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com>; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 21:07:08 -0500 (EST)
X-Received: from smtprly-de03.mx.aol.com (smtprly-de03.mx.aol.com [205.188.249.170]) by cia-dc05.mx.aol.com (v127.7) with ESMTP id MAILCIADC053-b2414b8489ba45; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 21:07:08 -0500
X-Received: from webmail-m057 (webmail-m057.sim.aol.com [64.12.158.157]) by smtprly-de03.mx.aol.com (v127.7) with ESMTP id MAILSMTPRLYDE032-b2414b8489ba45; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 21:06:50 -0500
To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 21:06:50 -0500
X-AOL-IP: 65.65.211.91
In-Reply-To: <803104.8072.qm@web84412.mail.ac2.yahoo.com>
X-MB-Message-Source: WebUI
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MB-Message-Type: User
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed
X-Mailer: AOL Webmail 30746-STANDARD
X-Received: from 65.65.211.91 by webmail-m057.sysops.aol.com (64.12.158.157) with HTTP (WebMailUI); Tue, 23 Feb 2010 21:06:50 -0500
Message-Id: <8CC830D28DDB9AA-1094-41A5@webmail-m057.sysops.aol.com>
X-Spam-Flag:NO
X-AOL-SENDER: CMcdon0923@aol.com
X-Originating-IP: 64.12.100.31
X-eGroups-Msg-Info: 1:12:0:0:0
From: CMcdon0923@aol.com
Subject: Re: [Colonial Numismatics] Why progress sucks!
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=2446688; y=hG9XWLZmLIZ9hPe6eGh_b0z0z56RrVltQVureq7p6vlEykTfSQ
X-Yahoo-Profile: cmcdon0923
Almost as bad....according to the article, they put up an apartment=20
complex.
-----Original Message-----
From: Steve Frank <taxi_steve929@yahoo.com>
To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tue, Feb 23, 2010 8:01 pm
Subject: Re: [Colonial Numismatics] Why progress sucks!
Horrible to see that....they probably put up a hamburger joint
--- On Tue, 2/23/10, marc <marcm@sunflower.com> wrote:
From: marc <marcm@sunflower.com>
Subject: [Colonial Numismatics] Why progress sucks!
To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
Date: Tuesday, February 23, 2010, 6:18 PM
=C2=A0
http://cgi.ebay. com/ws/eBayISAPI=20
.dll?ViewItem&item=3D290403685954&ssPageName=3DSTRK: MEWAX:IT - 2010-02-23
- 1
