| Contenuto dell'articolo |
- From Rosaamltd@aol.com Mon Dec 12 15:46:24 2011
Return-Path: <rosaamltd@gmail.com>
X-Sender: rosaamltd@gmail.com
X-Apparently-To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
X-Received: (qmail 35803 invoked from network); 12 Dec 2011 23:46:24 -0000
X-Received: from unknown (98.137.35.162)
by m10.grp.sp2.yahoo.com with QMQP; 12 Dec 2011 23:46:24 -0000
X-Received: from unknown (HELO mail-vx0-f177.google.com) (209.85.220.177)
by mta6.grp.sp2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 12 Dec 2011 23:46:24 -0000
X-Received: by vcbfl10 with SMTP id fl10so5695582vcb.36
for <colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com>; Mon, 12 Dec 2011 15:46:23 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.220.151.137 with SMTP id c9mr192644vcw.37.1323733583637; Mon,
12 Dec 2011 15:46:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.52.0.166 with HTTP; Mon, 12 Dec 2011 15:46:23 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAJYH9e-b_H_i9+Fydn37w8U_UEVYnfd6UgHkkKH+6_i4_3msRg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <43ef8.66558dc6.3c1799a6@aol.com>
<CAJYH9e-b_H_i9+Fydn37w8U_UEVYnfd6UgHkkKH+6_i4_3msRg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 15:46:23 -0800
X-Google-Sender-Auth: sVMTlQmcuS6xnnbv-Cz0BVnkFYU
Message-ID: <CAC7kd3T8cfkgYxW7hCPnnqp+OQ3=nYW+cqRTEmdHCDu1-DaTQg@mail.gmail.com>
To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d0437497307aabd04b3edbe82
X-Originating-IP: 209.85.220.177
X-eGroups-Msg-Info: 1:12:0:0:0
From: Jeff Rock <Rosaamltd@aol.com>
Subject: Re: [Colonial Numismatics] Wood 33 & "colonial" coins
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=36885228; y=CcE9mtxMBi34kwIkozWD7xba3NsNQAXa_YrRlHymARa_s_i0
X-Yahoo-Profile: rosaamltd
--f46d0437497307aabd04b3edbe82
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Yes, but then a lot of things still aren't included -- such as the later
tokens of Talbot, Allum & Lee and a bunch of Washingtonia that is dated
1794, 1795 and later, or a few years after the Philadelphia mint was
striking coins. In fact, most people would include the Washington funeral
medals in the colonial series, and those were done in 1799....not to
mention some of the "1783" dated Washington pieces that weren't actually
struck until 1815-1820. It's probably easier to include anything struck
prior to, say, the Hard Times tokens with the exception of
campaign/inaugural tokens and a handful of merchant tokens....but it's
definitely not an easily drawn line!
Jeff
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 2:17 PM, Black Richard X <blackrichardx@gmail.com>w=
rote:
> **
>
>
> From my newbie-collecting perspective, I just split at pre-federal mint
> too. :)
>
> _Rich_
>
>
> In a message dated 12/12/2011 12:26:39 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
>> njraywms@optonline.net writes:
>>
>> But to sum it up (and in conclusion) I misuse the term "colonial
>> coinage" as covering all coinage that circulated in our colonies from
>> Jamestown until the establishment of the Mint in Philadelphia in 1792.
>> Have fun today guys!
>>
>>
>>=20=20
>
--f46d0437497307aabd04b3edbe82
Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Yes, but then a lot of things still aren't included -- such as the late=
r tokens of Talbot, Allum & Lee and a bunch of Washingtonia that is dat=
ed 1794, 1795 and later, or a few years after the Philadelphia mint was str=
iking coins.=A0 In fact, most people would include the Washington funeral m=
edals in the colonial series, and those were done in 1799....not to mention=
some of the "1783" dated Washington pieces that weren't actu=
ally struck until 1815-1820.=A0 It's probably easier to include anythin=
g struck prior to, say, the Hard Times tokens with the exception of campaig=
n/inaugural tokens and a handful of merchant tokens....but it's definit=
ely not an easily drawn line!<br>
<br>Jeff<br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 2:17 PM,=
Black Richard X <span dir=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D"mailto:blackrichardx@gma=
il.com">blackrichardx@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=
=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padd=
ing-left:1ex">
<u></u>
<div style=3D"background-color:#fff">
<span>=A0</span>
<div>
<div>
<div>
=20=20=20=20=20=20
=20=20=20=20=20=20
<p>From my newbie-collecting perspective, I just split at pre-federal=
mint too.=A0 :)<br><br>=A0 _Rich_</p><div class=3D"im"><br><br>
<div class=3D"gmail_quote"><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"borde=
r-left:1px #ccc solid"><div style=3D"FONT-SIZE:14pt;COLOR:#000000;FONT-FAMI=
LY:Times New Roman"><font color=3D"#000000" face=3D"Times New Roman" size=
=3D"4"><div>
<div>
<div>In a message dated 12/12/2011 12:26:39 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,=20
<a href=3D"mailto:njraywms@optonline.net" target=3D"_blank">njraywms@optonl=
ine.net</a> writes:</div>
<blockquote style=3D"BORDER-LEFT:blue 2px solid"><font style=3D"BACKGROUND-=
COLOR:transparent" color=3D"#000000" face=3D"Georgia" size=3D"2">But to=20
sum it up (and in conclusion) I misuse the term "colonial <br>coinag=
e" as=20
covering all coinage that circulated in our colonies from <br>Jamestown u=
ntil=20
the establishment of the Mint in Philadelphia in 1792.<br>Have fun today=
=20
guys!<br></font></blockquote></div>
</div></font><br></div></blockquote></div>
</div><p></p>
</div>
=20=20=20=20=20
=20=20=20=20
<div style=3D"color:#fff;min-height:0"></div>
</div>
=20=20
</blockquote></div><br>
--f46d0437497307aabd04b3edbe82--
|
|---|
| URL di origine |
|
|---|
| Data di pubblicazione |
|
|---|
| Volume |
|
|---|
