"NE" Counterstamped Quarters at C4-ANA and C4 Convention 2002 Pubblico Deposited

Contenuto dell'articolo
  • From njraywms@optonline.net Sat Mar 03 19:37:05 2012
    Return-Path: <njraywms@optonline.net>
    X-Sender: njraywms@optonline.net
    X-Apparently-To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
    X-Received: (qmail 29467 invoked from network); 4 Mar 2012 03:37:05 -0000
    X-Received: from unknown (98.137.34.45)
    by m4.grp.sp2.yahoo.com with QMQP; 4 Mar 2012 03:37:05 -0000
    X-Received: from unknown (HELO mta2.srv.hcvlny.cv.net) (167.206.4.197)
    by mta2.grp.sp2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 4 Mar 2012 03:37:04 -0000
    X-Received: from DeeRayPC (ool-18bf5c8e.dyn.optonline.net [24.191.92.142])
    by mta2.srv.hcvlny.cv.net
    (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007))
    with SMTP id <0M0C00F7UCPO22D0@mta2.srv.hcvlny.cv.net> for
    colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com; Sat, 03 Mar 2012 22:37:04 -0500 (EST)
    Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2012 22:37:07 -0500
    To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
    Message-id: <A5DAC76BEA1F4F689A7C76A67022C0D8@DeeRayPC>
    MIME-version: 1.0
    X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V12.0.1606
    X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 12.0.1606
    Content-type: multipart/alternative;
    boundary="Boundary_(ID_zd9MJaJ/nBh6VkwQ62owNg)"
    Importance: Normal
    X-Priority: 3
    X-MSMail-priority: Normal
    References: <1330806141.19960.YahooMailNeo@web125604.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
    <1330820110.87902.YahooMailClassic@web190801.mail.sg3.yahoo.com>
    <CAC7kd3Tv5Y0V1FoJoZyCYcmzfTHG90uqiB9FYrrotDEkBxFFhQ@mail.gmail.com>
    <570FD4ADA20544D19582F19CC46CD50B@DeeRayPC>
    <CAC7kd3Qy+vPmbtP-jGmyUb1WmuR5a7uCE8LTQ4DcMK6Ezw=Dzw@mail.gmail.com>
    X-Originating-IP: 167.206.4.197
    X-eGroups-Msg-Info: 1:12:0:0:0
    From: Ray Williams <njraywms@optonline.net>
    Subject: "NE" Counterstamped Quarters at C4-ANA and C4 Convention 2002
    X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=78843690; y=RovdklR2Stt8wmLNOxtMW5xFvcmdLkR0L1bJOgFcdEIW
    X-Yahoo-Profile: njray2

    --Boundary_(ID_zd9MJaJ/nBh6VkwQ62owNg)
    Content-type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
    Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable

    Hi Jeff,
    Yes, you remember correctly - I supplied the quarters. the second link=
    below has a listing of what I struck. In addition to what is there, I did=
    strike some flattened lead musket balls during the year when the DK token =
    was being studied by Lou Jordan. I don't know how many - a dozen or two...
    But you'll see from the chart that there are some rarities. I know tha=
    t Clem asked me to strike a double strike error for him. I don't know for =
    sure, but that might be the only error strike.=20=20
    Ray=20=20

    http://www.gmmnut.com/gmm/gmm48.html#c4
    http://www.gmmnut.com/gmm/gmm51.html






    From: Jeff Rock=20
    Sent: Saturday, March 03, 2012 10:10 PM
    To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com=20
    Subject: Re: [Colonial Numismatics] date help --& Joseph Richardson, silver=
    smith




    Hmmm, Ray, the last one I got was free! Heck, I didn't even pay for the qu=
    arter it was counterstamped on -- it was a gift. How many did you make?


    On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 7:07 PM, Ray Williams <njraywms@optonline.net> wrote=
    :

    =20=20=20=20

    Jeff,
    I wonder how much the NE counterstamp is worth on NY & MA State Quart=
    ers??? LOL.
    That was a good way to have fun in 2002, celebrating the 350th annive=
    rsary of the Hull Mint. When I look at that punch, I remember the C4 Meeti=
    ng at ANA 2002 and the C4 Convention, where I brought an anvil, a two pound=
    sledge hammer, and counterstamped the quarters to give away. Lou Jordan's=
    book also came out that year too!
    Ray


    From: Jeff Rock=20
    Sent: Saturday, March 03, 2012 10:00 PM
    To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com=20
    Subject: Re: [Colonial Numismatics] date help --& Joseph Richardson, silv=
    ersmith


    Random IR or IB counterstamp on a copper coin =3D $5-50 depending on the =
    host coin. Joseph Richardson c/s on a copper coin is not known, but if one=
    showed up would be at least $5,000 and maybe a heck of a lot more!


    On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Paul K. Smith <culturalwarrior@yahoo.com.=
    hk> wrote:

    =20=20=20=20=20=20
    Roger, please enlighten me. Why would it be such a big deal? =
    =20



    --- On Sun, 3/4/12, Roger Moore <rogermoore435@yahoo.com> wrote:


    From: Roger Moore <rogermoore435@yahoo.com>=20

    Subject: Re: [Colonial Numismatics] date help --& Joseph Richar=
    dson, silversmith

    To: "colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com" <colonial-coins@yahoogroup=
    s.com>
    Date: Sunday, March 4, 2012, 4:22 AM=20






    Paul, Very interesting comment!!! Would be numismatically ea=
    rth shaking if there was some empirical evidence. Roger



    From: Paul K. Smith <culturalwarrior@yahoo.com.hk>
    To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com=20
    Sent: Saturday, March 3, 2012 2:26 PM
    Subject: Re: [Colonial Numismatics] date help --& Joseph Rich=
    ardson, silversmith

    =20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20
    Now that is intriguing.=20=20
    Wonder what the basis was for Joseph Richardson=
    's being selected and commissioned to strike the Kittanning Destroyed medal=
    in 1756, and the Easton medal in 1757. Had he struck any tokens or coins =
    earlier?
    (And that the same man who struck a medal honoring the =
    man who destroyed an Indian village, the next year strikes a medal commemor=
    ating peace with the Indians. Versatile like a chameleon.)=20
    Although it is fanciful rather than empirical =
    to speculate that 5 years earlier than his using Edward Duffield's design t=
    o strike these medals, that in 1752 he used John Hull's simple design in st=
    riking intrinsic-value Shillings of the 1652 NE Shilling. . .=20
    Yes, totally fanciful -- although. . .=20
    he was a successful merchant as well as a silversmith, =
    and the style of one of his earlier maker's marks is akin to the style of H=
    ull's "NE",=20
    the way the base of the Richardson's "I" and the descen=
    der of the "R" loop together at the base, within the cartouche,=20
    reminiscent of the way Hull's "N" and "E" loop together=
    at the top.


    --- On Sat, 3/3/12, dmenchell@aol.com <dmenchell@=
    aol.com> wrote:


    From: dmenchell@aol.com <dmenchell@aol.com>
    Subject: Re: [Colonial Numismatics] date help
    To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
    Date: Saturday, March 3, 2012, 4:10 PM


    Also remember that many silversmiths from the m=
    id-Atlantic region to Canada were also producing silver trinkets for the fu=
    r trade. While not coinage, the assortment of brooches, crosses, animal pe=
    ndants, ear bobs, arm bands, and other items were an important medium of ex=
    change with the Native Americans. And the earliest medals struck in the Co=
    lonies were engraved by silversmiths (e.g. the Treaty of Easton and Kittann=
    ing medals which were engraved and struck by Philadelphia silversmith Josep=
    h Richardson).

    In a message dated 3/3/2012 2:31:18 A.M. Easter=
    n Standard Time, books@bowmanstonepress.com writes:
    =
    =20
    A little later, but don't forget Standish Bar=
    ry and maybe Van Voorhis.




    -----Original Message-----From: "Jeff Rock" [=
    rosaamltd@gmail.com]Date: 03/03/2012 01:15 AMTo: colonial-coins@yahoogroups=
    .comSubject: Re: [Colonial Numismatics] date help=20=20=20

    Paul, no one is denying that there were engra=
    vers and silver and goldsmiths in colonial America -- there were quite a fe=
    w of them. Some like Chalmers, Revere, Brasher and Bailey and others all h=
    ad ties to coinage. But that doesn't mean that EVERY silversmith struck co=
    ins (though a few more than we thought did apparently regulate gold coinage=
    , which is very interersting). Nor did every Blacksmith strike copper toke=
    ns.

    You've mentioned this piece of Mass silver an=
    d continue to obliquely refer to it -- but have posted no pictures of it! =
    This is like the blind men trying to identify what an elephant is by touchi=
    ng it -- except that we don't even have the elephant! There are some incr=
    edibly knowledgable people on this group -- proabbly more than you will fin=
    d in any other setting in this country (and Canada, sorry Oliver). But the=
    y can't help at all if you're asking opinions on something that they have n=
    ot seen. Only a fool would offer an opinion without seeing what it is they=
    are talking about -- and I'm sure you can find some of those to say what y=
    ou want to hear. But if that's the kind of opinion you value, then by all =
    means go out and get it. A single photograph can at least help put you on =
    the right track, and in this day and age that is not difficult to do. I ha=
    ve taken decent enough pictures with my cell phone camera (not ideal, but a=
    t least good enough to tell what something is), and you clearly have intern=
    et capabilities, so this shouldn't be too difficult to do.=20=20
    On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 7:22 PM, Ray Williams =
    <njraywms@optonline.net> wrote:=20
    =
    =20

    All famous in their time, but did they stri=
    ke any coins or tokens that we know about?
    Ray

    From: Paul K. Smith

    Sent: Friday, March 02, 2012 7:42 PM
    To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
    Subject: Re: [Colonial Numismatics] date he=
    lp


    Ray, guess I'll begin with this dozen:=20=20
    Jeremiah Dummer, John Coney, Timothy Dwight=
    , Edward Winslow, David Jesse, Samuel Vernon, Benjamin Benton, Jacob Boelen=
    ,
    Caesare Ghiselin, John Nys, Phillip Syng, S=
    r., and Cornelius Kierstede.

    --- On Sat, 3/3/12, Ray Williams <njraywms@=
    optonline.net> wrote:


    From: Ray Williams <njraywms@optonline.net>
    Subject: Re: [Colonial Numismatics] date he=
    lp
    To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
    Date: Saturday, March 3, 2012, 8:07 AM


    Paul,
    What Craig is referring to here is that=
    we have another member who postulates some theories without any evidence a=
    nd he also clings to those theories even well after being disproven. It wo=
    uld be nice to think some silversmith issued his own coinage, but there is =
    no evidence that it ever happened and if something "miraculously" showed up=
    , it would be put to some very strong scrutiny. But if you find some conte=
    mporary documentation, I'd love to hear about it!

    Ray

    From: CMcdon0923@aol.com
    Sent: Friday, March 02, 2012 5:42 PM
    To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
    Subject: Re: [Colonial Numismatics] date he=
    lp

    JPL you little minx........is this actually=
    you ? <bg>





    In a message dated 3/2/2012 4:31:46 P.M. Ce=
    ntral Standard Time, culturalwarrior@yahoo.com.hk writes:
    =
    =20

    Is history what we observe?=20=20
    Or is history what we discover?
    Or, is history what happened, including wha=
    t we know, and
    what we in time discover.=20

    The dwarf planet Pluto existed for billions=
    of years,=20
    but no one "knew of" Pluto until 1930 --
    and it, like Uranus, was discovered by sear=
    ching out inferences.

    I simply think there are similar opportunit=
    ies for discovery
    in early numismatic Americana.=20=20

    --- On Sat, 3/3/12, Ray Williams <njraywms@=
    optonline.net> wrote:


    From: Ray Williams <njraywms@optonline.net>
    Subject: Re: [Colonial Numismatics] date he=
    lp
    To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
    Date: Saturday, March 3, 2012, 6:04 AM


    Not a silversmith, but Lord Baltimore struc=
    k silver coins. Chalmer was a silversmith and did strike coins. But I kno=
    w of no other silversmith that struck silver coins for local or wide circul=
    ation in the British American Colonies...
    Ray

    From: Paul K. Smith=20
    Sent: Friday, March 02, 2012 4:49 PM
    To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com=20
    Subject: Re: [Colonial Numismatics] date he=
    lp

    Jeff, I do not mean to walk all over your C=
    lub's dedication to Colonial-era copper counterfeits and evasions --
    -- and I realize that the copper half-penny=
    was the coin most commonly used for small transactions in the Colonies --
    but I am fully convinced there is a possibi=
    lity,=20=20
    following the abandonment of Massachusett's=
    silver coinage in 1682, and its General Court's rejection in 1686 of the p=
    roposal to renew coinage,
    that at least one enterprising silversmith =
    struck intrinsic value 3-pence, 6-pence, and shillings for commerce within =
    the Colonies.

    --- On Sat, 3/3/12, Jeff Rock <rosaamltd@gm=
    ail.com> wrote:


    From: Jeff Rock <rosaamltd@gmail.com>
    Subject: Re: [Colonial Numismatics] date he=
    lp
    To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
    Date: Saturday, March 3, 2012, 5:32 AM


    I think every country has their own version=
    of something that at least LOOKS like an evasion -- whether it was done to=
    actually evade counterfeiting laws is the question! There were plenty of =
    counterfeits made, in most (if not all) European countries, with backwards =
    letters and numbers, crude engravings, mis-spelled words, wrong portraits a=
    nd the like. For many of these you can chalk it up to an inexperienced cou=
    nterfeiter or die sinker, or just someone who didn't much care. As far as =
    I know, though, only England had the peculiar law that created a loophole f=
    or evasion coppers -- they were legal as long as they weren't an "exact" co=
    py of a regal copper.=20
    On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 1:27 PM, Paul K. Smi=
    th <culturalwarrior@yahoo.com.hk> wrote:=20
    =
    =20

    Good question. Dominic Labb=C3=A9 would kno=
    w. But my posting was meant as a tongue-in-cheek example of an "evasion".

    --- On Sat, 3/3/12, Paul Cartmill <cartmill=
    _paul@yahoo.com> wrote:


    From: Paul Cartmill <cartmill_paul@yahoo.co=
    m>=20
    Subject: Re: [Colonial Numismatics] date he=
    lp
    To: "colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com" <colon=
    ial-coins@yahoogroups.com>
    Date: Saturday, March 3, 2012, 4:58 AM=20

    Paul,As an ex Montrealer who enjoys a drink=
    i am intrigued....what would our blacksmith use for a blank? the only thre=
    e pence coins i know of are silver
    ...paul

    From: Paul K. Smith <culturalwarrior@yahoo.=
    com.hk>
    To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
    Sent: Friday, March 2, 2012 12:18:58 PM
    Subject: Re: [Colonial Numismatics] date he=
    lp
    =
    =20
    Well in Montreal they tell of the alco=
    holic blacksmith who when he felt the need for a drink would coin his own (=
    poor quality) silver threepence, or in that other British colony, Australia=
    , there was Conrad Erichsen, the Norwegian engraver who migratede to New So=
    uth Wales and struck his own sixpence. . . .=20=20

    --- On Sat, 3/3/12, Jeff Rock <rosaamltd@gm=
    ail.com> wrote:


    From: Jeff Rock <rosaamltd@gmail.com>
    Subject: Re: [Colonial Numismatics] date he=
    lp
    To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
    Date: Saturday, March 3, 2012, 3:45 AM


    Paul, you're mixing apples and oranges here=
    . There are no silver counterfeit halfpence/farthings or evasions! We are=
    talking about a very specific area here, counterfeit halfpence and evasion=
    coppers.=20=20

    You've asked about your Mass silver, which =
    is what I assume you are referring to here again, and as I said without a p=
    hotograph of the piece it's absolutely impossible for anyone to give you an=
    idea. It can be something that is 300 years old or something that is 3 ye=
    ars old. It could be worth tens of thousands of dollars or worth a few dol=
    lars as a modern curiosity. If I were you, I would invest in getting a pho=
    tograph taken, or get a digital camera and take one yourself -- because wit=
    hout that, anyone's guess is worth the paper it isn't printed on (well, unl=
    ess you print out the e-mail....then it's not even worth that).
    On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Paul K. Sm=
    ith <culturalwarrior@yahoo.com.hk> wrote:=20
    =
    =20
    Jeff, let's take a case where the stri=
    ke is in silver, it copies the legends,
    but it is way overweight -- as if to evade =
    the anti-counterfeiting law --
    is that silversmith's copy a counterfeit or=
    an evasion?

    --- On Sat, 3/3/12, Jeff Rock <rosaamltd@gm=
    ail.com> wrote:


    From: Jeff Rock <rosaamltd@gmail.com>=20
    Subject: Re: [Colonial Numismatics] date he=
    lp
    To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
    Date: Saturday, March 3, 2012, 2:08 AM=20

    Calvin, you're going to have to go back to =
    school! <g> First off, no Chris is involved in this thread! David posted=
    a pic of his 1777 counterfeit farthing -- clearly a 1777, with no doubt wh=
    atsoever as to the date. Second, an evasion is NOT a counterfeit. A count=
    erfeit copies the regal legends (GEORGIVS III REX, for instance). An evasi=
    on "evades" the counterfeiting law by altering the legends, sometimes a lit=
    tle, sometimes a lot. Take a look at the evasions that Roger posted and lo=
    ok at the legends on either side and see if you spot the difference.=20
    On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 8:14 AM, Calvin Godd=
    ard <petcal50@gmail.com> wrote:=20
    =
    =20
    =EF=BB=BF=20
    Thank for taking the time Roger and David &=
    Chris...I do see the issues involved here...I have a stupid question...you=
    state you att. 2, 1777 evasion 1/4d, then write you have never seen a CFT =
    1777....isn't an evasion considered a CFT?
    ----- Original Message -----=20
    From: Roger Moore=20
    To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com=20
    Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2012 4:49 PM
    Subject: Re: [Colonial Numismatics] date he=
    lp

    =
    =20
    Hello Calvin, Just home after a long day. =
    Though 1777 would be nice, for a farthing the most common date is 1773 and=
    I think that is what your coin is. It could be a 1771 with a long top to =
    the one-digit - we see this alot in the halfpence series and 1771s are ofte=
    n labeled on eBay as 1777s. However, 1771's are VERY rare. I have attached =
    one 1771, and a few 1773 farthings with no attempt to find a die match for =
    your coin but simply to point out how the threes look on some of them. You=
    can imagine in your coin that only the upper half of the 3 can be seen sin=
    ce the rest is off the planchet. I think your coin is a 1773. I agree wit=
    h David, that it is not a 1777. I have attached two 1777 farthing evasions=
    in my collection. I have never seen a 1777 counterfeit farthing though I =
    would not go so far as to say one does not exist!! I just don't think your=
    coin fits that label. Sorry. Roger

    From: Calvin Goddard <petcal50@gmail.com>
    To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
    Sent: Thursday, March 1, 2012 11:57 AM
    Subject: [Colonial Numismatics] date help
    =
    =20
    =EF=BB=BF=20

    If folks want to help with dating this Fart=
    hing, I would appreciate it...D.P. suggested 1775...pic Q3 looks like 1770,=
    Q4 makes it look like 1720!
    Thanks
    Calvin.

    =
    =20


    =
    =20

    =
    =20





    =
    =20


    =
    =20





    =
    =20





    =20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20
    =20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20



    =20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20















    --Boundary_(ID_zd9MJaJ/nBh6VkwQ62owNg)
    Content-type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
    Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable

    <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
    <HTML><HEAD>
    <META content=3Dtext/html;charset=3Dutf-8 http-equiv=3DContent-Type>
    <STYLE type=3Dtext/css>
    <!--

    /* start of attachment style */
    .ygrp-photo-title{
    clear: both;
    font-size: smaller;
    height: 15px;
    overflow: hidden;
    text-align: center;
    width: 75px;
    }
    div.ygrp-photo{
    background-position: center;
    background-repeat: no-repeat;
    background-color: white;
    border: 1px solid black;
    height: 62px;
    width: 62px;
    }

    div.photo-title=20
    a,
    div.photo-title a:active,
    div.photo-title a:hover,
    div.photo-title a:visited {
    text-decoration: none;=20
    }

    div.attach-table div.attach-row {
    clear: both;
    }

    div.attach-table div.attach-row div {
    float: left;
    /* margin: 2px;*/
    }

    p {
    clear: both;
    padding: 15px 0 3px 0;
    overflow: hidden;
    }

    div.ygrp-file {
    width: 30px;
    valign: middle;
    }
    div.attach-table div.attach-row div div a {
    text-decoration: none;
    }

    div.attach-table div.attach-row div div span {
    font-weight: normal;
    }

    div.ygrp-file-title {
    font-weight: bold;
    }
    /* end of attachment style */
    -->
    </STYLE>

    <STYLE type=3Dtext/css>
    <!--
    #ygrp-mkp {
    border: 1px solid #d8d8d8;
    font-family: Arial;
    margin: 10px 0;
    padding: 0 10px;
    }

    #ygrp-mkp hr {
    border: 1px solid #d8d8d8;
    }

    #ygrp-mkp #hd {
    color: #628c2a;
    font-size: 85%;
    font-weight: 700;
    line-height: 122%;
    margin: 10px 0;
    }

    #ygrp-mkp #ads {
    margin-bottom: 10px;
    }

    #ygrp-mkp .ad {
    padding: 0 0;
    }

    #ygrp-mkp .ad p {
    margin: 0;
    }

    #ygrp-mkp .ad a {
    color: #0000ff;
    text-decoration: none;
    }
    -->
    </STYLE>

    <META name=3DGENERATOR content=3D"MSHTML 9.00.8112.16441"></HEAD>
    <BODY style=3D"PADDING-LEFT: 10px; PADDING-RIGHT: 10px; PADDING-TOP: 15px"=
    =20
    id=3DMailContainerBody leftMargin=3D0 topMargin=3D0 bgColor=3D#ffffff=20
    CanvasTabStop=3D"true" name=3D"Compose message area">
    <DIV><FONT size=3D2 face=3DArial>Hi Jeff,</FONT></DIV>
    <DIV>    <FONT size=3D2 face=3DArial>Yes, you remember =
    correctly=20
    - I supplied the quarters.  the <U>second link</U> below has a listing=
    of=20
    what I struck.  In addition to what is there, I did strike some flatte=
    ned=20
    lead musket balls during the year when the DK token was being studied by Lo=
    u=20
    Jordan.  I don't know how many - a dozen or two...</FONT></DIV>
    <DIV>    <FONT size=3D2 face=3DArial>But you'll see fro=
    m the=20
    chart that there are some rarities.  I know that Clem asked me to stri=
    ke a=20
    double strike error for him.  I don't know for sure, but that might be=
    the=20
    only error strike.  </FONT></DIV>
    <DIV><FONT size=3D2 face=3DArial>Ray</FONT>  </DIV>
    <DIV><FONT size=3D2 face=3DArial></FONT> </DIV>
    <DIV><FONT size=3D2 face=3DArial><A=20
    title=3D"http://www.gmmnut.com/gmm/gmm48.html#c4 CTRL + Click to follow=
    link"=20
    href=3D"http://www.gmmnut.com/gmm/gmm48.html#c4">http://www.gmmnut.com/gmm/=
    gmm48.html#c4</A></FONT></DIV>
    <DIV><FONT size=3D2 face=3DArial><A=20
    title=3D"http://www.gmmnut.com/gmm/gmm51.html CTRL + Click to follow li=
    nk"=20
    href=3D"http://www.gmmnut.com/gmm/gmm51.html">http://www.gmmnut.com/gmm/gmm=
    51.html</A></FONT></DIV>
    <DIV><FONT size=3D2 face=3DArial></FONT> </DIV>
    <DIV><FONT size=3D2 face=3DArial></FONT> </DIV>
    <DIV><FONT size=3D2 face=3DArial></FONT> </DIV>
    <DIV> </DIV>
    <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt Tahoma">
    <DIV><BR></DIV>
    <DIV style=3D"BACKGROUND: #f5f5f5">
    <DIV style=3D"font-color: black"><B>From:</B> <A=20
    title=3D"mailto:rosaamltd
URL di origine Data di pubblicazione
  • 2012-03-03
Volume
  • 1

Le relazioni

Autore NNP