DANSKE AMERICANSK Public Deposited

Re

Article content
  • From njraywms@optonline.net Wed Feb 20 03:46:22 2013
    Return-Path: <njraywms@optonline.net>
    X-Sender: njraywms@optonline.net
    X-Apparently-To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
    X-Received: (qmail 69193 invoked from network); 20 Feb 2013 11:46:16 -0000
    X-Received: from unknown (10.193.84.135)
    by m12.grp.bf1.yahoo.com with QMQP; 20 Feb 2013 11:46:16 -0000
    X-Received: from unknown (HELO mta5.srv.hcvlny.cv.net) (167.206.4.200)
    by mta1.grp.bf1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 20 Feb 2013 11:46:15 -0000
    X-Received: from DeeRayPC (ool-18bf5eb5.dyn.optonline.net [24.191.94.181])
    by mta5.srv.hcvlny.cv.net
    (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007))
    with SMTP id <0MII008EPOOMSYD0@mta5.srv.hcvlny.cv.net> for
    colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 06:46:14 -0500 (EST)
    Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 06:46:07 -0500
    To: Colonialcoins <colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com>
    Message-id: <8EA28612AC4D4253975993A45F0D3AB7@DeeRayPC>
    MIME-version: 1.0
    X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V12.0.1606
    X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 12.0.1606
    Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="Boundary_(ID_W/QLI7GZXJhw8k460JtEIw)"
    Importance: Normal
    X-Priority: 3
    X-MSMail-priority: Normal
    X-Originating-IP: 167.206.4.200
    X-eGroups-Msg-Info: 1:5:0:0:0
    From: Ray Williams <njraywms@optonline.net>
    Subject: Re: DANSKE AMERICANSK
    X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=78843690; y=AmpknmVLcuWzKfhbaLbzxvZU7vF4aeaXLZFOmtZj7GHW
    X-Yahoo-Profile: njray2

    --Boundary_(ID_W/QLI7GZXJhw8k460JtEIw)
    Content-type: multipart/alternative;
    boundary="Boundary_(ID_3fJ/pGDb6TTTLffndBSUUw)"

    --Boundary_(ID_3fJ/pGDb6TTTLffndBSUUw)
    Content-type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
    Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable

    Roger,
    The labeling of I1696RAM is correct as the attachment description, but =
    on the photo itself, you have "1669"
    Thanks for posting.
    Ray


    From: Roger Moore=20
    Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2013 1:31 PM
    To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com=20
    Subject: Re: [Colonial Numismatics] Re: DANSKE AMERICANSK





    Hi Jeff, Attached in the other side of the insert for my Auctori. I have =
    also included two images of coins - one an evasion and one of a cft that ha=
    ve a face of George (I know the direction is not right on the evasion but s=
    till look at it!!) very similar to the Auctori. I actually find these grou=
    pings fascinating. Much less so the HOH Auctori coin with the essentially =
    Conn. obverse. Roger



    From: Jeff Rock <rosaamltd@gmail.com>
    To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com=20
    Sent: Monday, December 31, 2012 9:06 PM
    Subject: Re: [Colonial Numismatics] Re: DANSKE AMERICANSK

    =20=20=20=20
    The things we call Auctori Plebis "mules" are really evasion coppers -- t=
    hough it's a weird little group, with only one reverse actually used with a=
    known evasion, all the rest just used with other Auctori Plebis dies. We =
    call them mules because that makes them more valuable than calling them eva=
    sions -- just like the North Wales pieces. The double star and lettered ed=
    ge pieces are definitely rarer, but they are just as definitely evasion cop=
    pers -- not American colonials. But no one in their right mind would pay $=
    25,000 for an evasion coper, so with just a slight change of nomenclature a=
    bout $24,000 of value has been added to them.


    On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 7:07 AM, Byron <bkw11@psu.edu> wrote:=20
    =20=20=20=20=20=20
    ...I don't know guys, Kirk was a much better engraver than that.

    Interestingly the profile of the TVRCVPELLERIVS piece curiously matches=
    my own profile from my biker days - I'll have to dig out those photos!<s>

    Byron=20
    --- In mailto:colonial-coins%40yahoogroups.com, books@... wrote:>> > > =
    > Makes perfect sense, Michael. Thank you, Will> > > > Will> > > =C3=82 =
    > > > TVRCVPELLERIVS may relate to Turcu Pellerius the title of the command=
    er of the mercemaries of the order of St.John of Jerusalem. The initials IK=
    are perhaps those of John Kirk.> > > =C3=82 > > > Michael.> > >> > >> > > =
    ________________________________> > >>=20
    > From: "books@..." <books@...>=20
    > > > To: mailto:colonial-coins%40yahoogroups.com> > > Sent: Sunday, 30=
    December 2012, 21:55> > > Subject: Re: [Colonial Numismatics] Re: DANSKE A=
    MERICANSK> > >> > > =C3=82 > > >> > > Marc, Sounds like a deal to me!=C3=82=
    Glad you found it.>=20
    > > Roger, as regards the Auctori Plebis tokens, I just don't know.=C3=
    =82 I've always thought that the Auctori Plebis' American connection was s=
    omewhat tenuous.=C3=82 Even so, with the "Connecticut" obverse and indepen=
    dence and liberty on the reverse, I can see how they might have been made f=
    or export to the U.S.=C3=82 - maybe as Breen said, at the request of an Ame=
    rican businessman.=C3=82 I also think that the reverse of the "usual varie=
    ty" depicts a rather sad or at least contemplative Britannia, taking stock =
    of her remaining empire.=C3=82 So, I can see keeping it in the American se=
    ries on the absence of evidence for removing it.=C3=82 We know that it was=
    around by 1795.=C3=82 If it were issued around 1795, then I think that th=
    e legends could conceivably refer to the political debates that going on in=
    England and the rest of Europe at that time (RE: Thomas Paine and The Righ=
    ts of Man) and not ! necessarily to America.=20
    > > > Also,=C3=82 I kind of doubt that the Hispanola and uniface AP are=
    just other varieties of the=C3=82 "usual" Conder token motif.=C3=82 I ten=
    d to think that they are counterfeits of it, or evasions made by another ha=
    nd - which would suggest that all were floating around England.=C3=82 I've=
    bid (unsuccessfully) on=C3=82 a few=C3=82 of the "others" over the years a=
    nd it seems as if they are almost always posted by British sellers, who oft=
    en don't point out the connection to the "American" Auctori Plebis tokens.=
    =C3=82 Again, the bottom line is that I'm not sure.> > > Another piece tha=
    t I find rather interesting is the evasion with TVRCVPELLERIVS / HISPANIOLA=
    IK. The IK initials seem somewhat analagous to IC, not to mention the Hisp=
    aniola (Haiti) similarity.=C3=82 Perhaps a Kempson?> > > Anyway, good ques=
    tion, worthy of research.> > > Thanks,> > > Will> > >>=20
    > >> Will,I have a piece very similar to yours tha! t in in my SDBox. I=
    t is weird because I just got back from Branson and was cleaning my car out=
    , when I stumbled onto the ebay receipt for the coin, way down under the se=
    ats.I came in and checked my emails and there was Bryon's message which sta=
    rted this thread.I paid 99 bucks for mine which is probably too high, but i=
    t was a BIN and I wanted it.I'll post a pix next time I get tot the bank.As=
    far as which coins should be considered American, I'm not sure. Bob Vlack =
    in his book included Cayenne 2 sous pieces only because they were struck ov=
    er the old Sous Marques of 24 deniers.However, why would they not be consid=
    ered colonial being struck by the French for their colony in Guiana in the =
    1780 time frame. I'm pretty sure some of the people from South America,as w=
    ell as Central America, for that matter,consider themselves Americans.I'll =
    bet a lot of these still circulated in Canada and Nova Scotia.=C3=83=E2=80=
    =9A=C3=82 Something> > > I > need to read up on.Marc > > --- On Sun, 12/30/=
    12, books@... <books@...> wrote: > >> > From: books@... <books@...> > Subje=
    ct: Re: [Colonial Numismatics] Re: DANSKE AMERICANSK > To: mailto:colonial-=
    coins%40yahoogroups.com > Date: Sunday, December 30, 2012, 11:34 AM > > > >=
    > > > > > > > > > > > > > =C3=83=E2=80=9A=C3=82 > > > > > > > > > > I agr=
    ee that more deference should be given to certain foreign coins that circul=
    ated here extensively.=C3=83=E2=80=9A=C3=82 I'm not sure I want them eleva=
    ted to full "American" status, but there needs to be some popular recogniti=
    on of their respective roles. Maybe Leo=C3=83=E2=80=9A=C3=82 should be a co=
    nsultant to Red Book. :)IMHO, the DWI issues should be regarded as American=
    =C3=83=E2=80=9A=C3=82 Have thought so for years. Their circumstances are an=
    alagous to Northwest tokens, Texas jolas, French colonial pieces and others=
    ,=C3=83=E2=80=9A=C3=82 (attached a pic pic of a 24 skilings counterfeit in=
    copper, unsilvered.)I'm on the fence about hogge> > > money.=C3=83=E2=80=
    =9A=C3=82 To my knowledge, none have been found on American soil and the f=
    ormal connection with the Virginia Company had been dissolved by the time t=
    hey were minted.=C3=83=E2=80=9A=C3=82 In that sense, they are very little d=
    ifferent from the later Bermuda, Bahamas and Barbadoes issues. However, som=
    e of the key players from Somer's mission, including S! trachey, were impor=
    tant in Vir! > ginia.=C3=83=E2=80=9A=C3=82 I think it likely that some of t=
    he coins ended up here. But, is all that enough to regard them as the first=
    "American" coins?=C3=83=E2=80=9A=C3=82 Maybe. Maybe not..Will=C3=83=E2=80=
    =9A=C3=82 =C3=83=E2=80=9A=C3=82 =C3=83=E2=80=9A=C3=82 =C3=83=E2=80=9A=C3=82=
    > Hi Ray,I agree with you 100%. The triangular trade, ie, timber and horse=
    s for molasses,rum,and slaves was the backbone of the colonial economy and =
    the Dutch, French, and other coins should probably be considered colonial. =
    Ditto-the Lion dollar.One needs to be careful of calling the Dutch "sailing=
    ship" coins counterfeit, for near the end of their run they were pretty wr=
    etched.While th!=20
    > e may look like imitations,>=20
    > > they were, in fact, official coinage.Marc > >> > >> > >> --- On Thu=
    , 12/27/12, Ray Williams <njraywms@...> wrote: > >> > >> > >> > From: Ray W=
    illiams <njraywms@...> > >> Subject: Re: [Colonial Numismatics] Re: DANSKE =
    AMERICANSK > >> To: mailto:colonial-coins%40yahoogroups.com > >> Date: Thur=
    sday, December 27, 2012, 3:07 PM > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > =
    >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> =C3=83=C6=92=C3=A2=E2=82=AC=C5=
    =A1=C3=83=E2=80=9A=C3=82 > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >>=
    > >> > >> > >> Hi All, > >> =C3=83=C6=92=C3=A2=E2=82=AC=C5=A1=C3=83=E2=80=
    =9A=C3=82 =C3=83=C6=92=C3=A2=E2=82=AC=C5=A1=C3=83=E2=80=9A=C3=82 =C3=83=C6=
    =92=C3=A2=E2=82=AC=C5=A1=C3=83=E2=80=9A=C3=82 =C3=83=C6=92=C3=A2=E2=82=AC=
    =C5=A1=C3=83=E2=80=9A=C3=82 This coin has intrigued me > >> ever since Syd'=
    s well-researched article.=C3=83=C6=92=C3=A2=E2=82=AC=C5=A1=C3=83=E2=80=9A=
    =C3=82 How much more "American" can you > >> get for the time period than =
    to have America in the legend!!!=C3=83=C6=92=C3=A2=E2=82=AC=C5=A1=C3=83=E2=
    =80=9A=C3=82 The Danish > >> West Indes were (are) part of America - just =
    not British America.=C3=83=C6=92=C3=A2=E2=82=AC=C5=A1=C3=83=E2=80=9A=C3=82 =
    The > >> other two European coins struck with a direct American reference =
    in the legend > >> that I can think of are t!> he Rosa Americana> > > coina=
    ge=C3=83=C6=92=C3=A2=E2=82=AC=C5=A1=C3=83=E2=80=9A=C3=82 and the Virginia >=
    >> Halfpence.=C3=83=C6=92=C3=A2=E2=82=AC=C5=A1=C3=83=E2=80=9A=C3=82 Someo=
    ne please correct me if I'm forgetting something.=C3=83=C6=92=C3=A2=E2=82=
    =AC=C5=A1=C3=83=E2=80=9A=C3=82 > >> > >> =C3=83=C6=92=C3=A2=E2=82=AC=C5=A1=
    =C3=83=E2=80=9A=C3=82 =C3=83=C6=92=C3=A2=E2=82=AC=C5=A1=C3=83=E2=80=9A=C3=
    =82 =C3=83=C6=92=C3=A2=E2=82=AC=C5=A1=C3=83=E2=80=9A=C3=82 =C3=83=C6=92=C3=
    =A2=E2=82=AC=C5=A1=C3=83=E2=80=9A=C3=82 I have a 12 Skilling > >> contempor=
    ary forgery (brass I assume) and I am keeping an eye open for a 24 > >> Ski=
    lling example.=C3=83=C6=92=C3=A2=E2=82=AC=C5=A1=C3=83=E2=80=9A=C3=82 I fee=
    l somewhat strongly that if the Red Book includes > >> the Bermuda Hogge Mo=
    ney, then the Danish West Indes coins should be there > >> too.=C3=83=C6=92=
    =C3=A2=E2=82=AC=C5=A1=C3=83=E2=80=9A=C3=82 While I'm talking Red Book, if =
    there's an 8R coin pictured on page > >> 11, I really feel that a Lion Doll=
    ar should be pictured there too.=C3=83=C6=92=C3=A2=E2=82=AC=C5=A1=C3=83=E2=
    =80=9A=C3=82 The > >> Lion Dollar was important enough in our early Americ=
    an economy where it was both > >> counterfeited in the colonies and used as=
    a denomination on!> some of our early > >> paper money.=C3=83=C6=92=C3=A2=
    =E2=82=AC=C5=A1=C3=83=E2=80=9A=C3=82 Ok...=C3=83=C6=92=C3=A2=E2=82=AC=C5=
    =A1=C3=83=E2=80=9A=C3=82 off my soap box.=C3=83=C6=92=C3=A2=E2=82=AC=C5=A1=
    =C3=83=E2=80=9A=C3=82 > >> Enjoying the posts > >> Ray > >> Phil, > >> =C3=
    =83=C6=92=C3=A2=E2=82=AC=C5=A1=C3=83=E2=80=9A=C3=82 =C3=83=C6=92=C3=A2=E2=
    =82=AC=C5=A1=C3=83=E2=80=9A=C3=82 =C3=83=C6=92=C3=A2=E2=82=AC=C5=A1=C3=83=
    =E2=80=9A=C3=82 =C3=83=C6=92=C3=A2=E2=82=AC=C5=A1=C3=83=E2=80=9A=C3=82 Is t=
    here a projected > >> publication> > > date yet? > >> Ray > >> > >> > >> > =
    >> > >> > >> > From: PLMossman@... > >> Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2012 2=
    :44 PM > >> To: mailto:colonial-coins%40yahoogroups.com > >> > >> Subject: =
    Re: [Colonial Numismatics] Re: DANSKE > >> AMERICANSK > >> > >> > >> =C3=83=
    =C6=92=C3=A2=E2=82=AC=C5=A1=C3=83=E2=80=9A=C3=82 > >> =C3=83=C6=92=C3=A2=
    =E2=82=AC=C5=A1=C3=83=E2=80=9A=C3=82 > >> In a message dated 12/27/2012 2:=
    21:32 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, rosaamltd@... writes: > >> We > >> defini=
    tely want pictures of all of the above!!!! > >> > >> You'll have to wait un=
    til my book comes out! > >> Phil > >> > >> =C3=83=C6=92=C3=A2=E2=82=AC=C5=
    =A1=C3=83=E2=80=9A=C3=82 > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >>=
    > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >>=
    > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >>




    --Boundary_(ID_3fJ/pGDb6TTTLffndBSUUw)
    Content-type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
    Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable

    <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
    <HTML><HEAD>
    <META content=3Dtext/html;charset=3Dutf-8 http-equiv=3DContent-Type>
    <STYLE type=3Dtext/css>
    <!--

    /* start of attachment style */
    .ygrp-photo-title{
    clear: both;
    font-size: smaller;
    height: 15px;
    overflow: hidden;
    text-align: center;
    width: 75px;
    }
    div.ygrp-photo{
    background-position: center;
    background-repeat: no-repeat;
    background-color: white;
    border: 1px solid black;
    height: 62px;
    width: 62px;
    }

    div.photo-title=20
    a,
    div.photo-title a:active,
    div.photo-title a:hover,
    div.photo-title a:visited {
    text-decoration: none;=20
    }

    div.attach-table div.attach-row {
    clear: both;
    }

    div.attach-table div.attach-row div {
    float: left;
    /* margin: 2px;*/
    }

    p {
    clear: both;
    padding: 15px 0 3px 0;
    overflow: hidden;
    }

    div.ygrp-file {
    width: 30px;
    valign: middle;
    }
    div.attach-table div.attach-row div div a {
    text-decoration: none;
    }

    div.attach-table div.attach-row div div span {
    font-weight: normal;
    }

    div.ygrp-file-title {
    font-weight: bold;
    }
    /* end of attachment style */
    -->
    </STYLE>

    <META name=3DGENERATOR content=3D"MSHTML 9.00.8112.16464"></HEAD>
    <BODY style=3D"PADDING-LEFT: 10px; PADDING-RIGHT: 10px; PADDING-TOP: 15px"=
    =20
    id=3DMailContainerBody leftMargin=3D0 topMargin=3D0 bgColor=3D#ffffff=20
    CanvasTabStop=3D"true" name=3D"Compose message area">
    <DIV><FONT size=3D2 face=3DArial>Roger,</FONT></DIV>
    <DIV>    <FONT size=3D2 face=3DArial>The labeling of I1=
    696RAM is=20
    correct as the attachment description, but on the photo itself, you have=20
    "1669"</FONT></DIV>
    <DIV><FONT size=3D2 face=3DArial>Thanks for posting.</FONT></DIV>
    <DIV><FONT size=3D2 face=3DArial>Ray</FONT></DIV>
    <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt Tahoma">
    <DIV><BR></DIV>
    <DIV style=3D"BACKGROUND: #f5f5f5">
    <DIV style=3D"font-color: black"><B>From:</B> <A=20
    title=3D"mailto:rogermoore435@yahoo.com CTRL + Click to follow link"=20
    href=3D"mailto:rogermoore435@yahoo.com">Roger Moore</A> </DIV>
    <DIV><B>Sent:</B> Tuesday, January 01, 2013 1:31 PM</DIV>
    <DIV><B>To:</B> <A title=3Dcolonial-coins@yahoogroups.com=20
    href=3D"mailto:colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com">colonial-coins@yahoogroups..=
    com</A>=20
    </DIV>
    <DIV><B>Subject:</B> Re: [Colonial Numismatics] Re: DANSKE=20
    AMERICANSK</DIV></DIV></DIV>
    <DIV><BR></DIV>
    <DIV=20
    style=3D"BACKGROUND-COLOR: #fff; FONT-FAMILY: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;=
    COLOR: #000; FONT-SIZE: 14pt">
    <DIV style=3D"RIGHT: auto"><SPAN style=3D"RIGHT: auto">Hi Jeff,  Attac=
    hed in=20
    the other side of the insert for my Auctori.  I have also included two=
    =20
    images of coins - one an evasion and one of a cft that have a face of Georg=
    e (I=20
    know the direction is not right on the evasion but still look at it!!) very=
    =20
    similar to the Auctori.  I actually find these groupings fascinating.&=
    nbsp;=20
    Much less so the HOH Auctori <VAR id=3Dyui-ie-cursor></VAR>coin with the=20
    essentially Conn. obverse.    Roger<BR style=3D"RIGHT: auto"=
    =20
    class=3Dyui-cursor></SPAN></DIV>
    <DIV style=3D"RIGHT: auto"><BR>
    <BLOCKQUOTE=20
    style=3D"BORDER-LEFT: rgb(16,16,255) 2px solid; MARGIN-TOP: 5px; PADDING-LE=
    FT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; RIGHT: auto">
    <DIV style=3D"FONT-FAMILY: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; FONT-SIZE: 14pt"=
    >
    <DIV=20
    style=3D"FONT-FAMILY: times new roman, new york, times, serif; FONT-SIZE:=
    12pt">
    <DIV dir=3Dltr><FONT size=3D2 face=3DArial>
    <DIV=20
    style=3D"BORDER-BOTTOM: #ccc 1px solid; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid; PADD=
    ING-BOTTOM: 0px; LINE-HEIGHT: 0; MARGIN: 5px 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 0px; PADDIN=
    G-RIGHT: 0px; HEIGHT: 0px; FONT-SIZE: 0px; BORDER-TOP: #ccc 1px solid; BORD=
    ER-RIGHT: #ccc 1px solid; PADDING-TOP: 0px"=20
    class=3Dhr contentEditable=3Dfalse readonly=3D"true"></DIV><B><SPAN=20
    style=3D"FONT-WEIGHT: bold">From:</SPAN></B> Jeff Rock=20
    <rosaamltd@gmail.com><BR><B><SPAN=20
    style=3D"FONT-WEIGHT: bold">To:</SPAN></B> colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com=
    =20
    <BR><B><SPAN style=3D"FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Sent:</SPAN></B> Monday, Decembe=
    r 31,=20
    2012 9:06 PM<BR><B><SPAN style=3D"FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Subject:</SPAN></B> =
    Re:=20
    [Colonial Numismatics] Re: DANSKE AMERICANSK<BR></FONT></DIV><WBR>
    <DIV style=3D"RIGHT: auto" id=3Dyiv17859317>
    <DIV style=3D"RIGHT: auto"><SPAN style=3D"DISPLAY: none"> </SPAN>=20
    <DIV id=3Dyiv17859317ygrp-text>
    <DIV>The things we call Auctori Plebis "mules" are really evasion coppers=
    --=20
    though it's a weird little group, with only one reverse actually used wit=
    h a=20
    known evasion, all the rest just used with other Auctori Plebis dies.&nbs=
    p; We=20
    call them mules because that makes them more valuable than calling them=20
    evasions -- just like the North Wales pieces.  The double star and=20
    lettered edge pieces are definitely rarer, but they are just as definitel=
    y=20
    evasion coppers -- not American colonials.  But no one in their righ=
    t=20
    mind would pay $25,000 for an evasion coper, so with just a slight change=
    of=20
    nomenclature about $24,000 of value has been added to them.<BR><BR>
    <DIV class=3Dyiv17859317gmail_quote>On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 7:07 AM, Byro=
    n <SPAN=20
    dir=3Dltr><<A href=3D"mailto:bkw11@psu.edu" rel=3Dnofollow target=3D_b=
    lank=20
    ymailto=3D"mailto:bkw11@psu.edu">bkw11@psu.edu</A>></SPAN> wrote:<WBR>=
    =20
    <BLOCKQUOTE style=3D"BORDER-LEFT: rgb(204,204,204) 1px solid"=20
    class=3Dyiv17859317gmail_quote><U></U>
    <DIV><SPAN> </SPAN>=20
    <DIV>
    <DIV>
    <DIV>
    <DIV>...I don't know guys, Kirk was a much better engraver than=20
    that.<BR><BR>Interestingly the profile of the TVRCVPELLERIVS piece curi=
    ously=20
    matches my own profile from my biker days - I'll have to dig out those=
    =20
    photos!<s><BR><BR>Byron=20
    <DIV class=3Dyiv17859317im><WBR><WBR>--- In <A=20
    href=3D"mailto:colonial-coins%40yahoogroups.com" rel=3Dnofollow target=
    =3D_blank=20
    ymailto=3D"mailto:colonial-coins%40yahoogroups.com">mailto:colonial-coi=
    ns%40yahoogroups.com</A>,=20
    books@... wrote:<WBR>><WBR>> <WBR>> <WBR>> <WBR>> Makes=
    =20
    perfect sense, Michael.  Thank you, Will<WBR>>  <WBR>>=
    =20
     <WBR>> > Will<WBR>> <WBR>> > =C3=82 <WBR>>=
    <WBR>>=20
    > TVRCVPELLERIVS may relate to Turcu Pellerius the title of the comm=
    ander=20
    of the mercemaries of the order of St.John of Jerusalem. The initials I=
    K are=20
    perhaps those of John Kirk.<WBR>> <WBR>> > =C3=82 <WBR>&g=
    t;=20
    <WBR>> > Michael.<WBR>> <WBR>> ><WBR>> <WBR>>=20
    ><WBR>> <WBR>> > ________________________________<WBR>>=
    =20
    <WBR>> ><WBR>> <WBR></DIV>> From: "books@..." <books@...=
    >=20
    <DIV class=3Dyiv17859317im><WBR>> <WBR>> > To: <A=20
    href=3D"mailto:colonial-coins%40yahoogroups.com" rel=3Dnofollow target=
    =3D_blank=20
    ymailto=3D"mailto:colonial-coins%40yahoogroups.com">mailto:colonial-coi=
    ns%40yahoogroups.com</A><WBR>>=20
    <WBR>> > Sent: Sunday, 30 December 2012, 21:55<WBR>> <WBR>>=
    >=20
    Subject: Re: [Colonial Numismatics] Re: DANSKE AMERICANSK<WBR>> <WBR=
    >>=20
    ><WBR>> <WBR>> > =C3=82 <WBR>> <WBR>> ><WBR>&=
    gt;=20
    <WBR>> > Marc, Sounds like a deal to me!=C3=82  Glad you fou=
    nd=20
    it.<WBR>> <WBR></DIV>> > Roger, as regards the Auctori Plebis=
    =20
    tokens, I just don't know.=C3=82  I've always thought that the Auc=
    tori=20
    Plebis' American connection was somewhat tenuous.=C3=82  Even so, =
    with the=20
    "Connecticut" obverse and independence and liberty on the reverse, I ca=
    n see=20
    how they might have been made for export to the U.S.=C3=82 - maybe=
    as Breen=20
    said, at the request of an American businessman.=C3=82  I also thi=
    nk that=20
    the reverse of the "usual variety" depicts a rather sad or at least=20
    contemplative Britannia, taking stock of her remaining empire.=C3=82&nb=
    sp; So, I=20
    can see keeping it in the American series on the absence of evidence fo=
    r=20
    removing it.=C3=82  We know that it was around by 1795.=C3=82 =
    ; If it were=20
    issued around 1795, then I think that the legends could conceivably ref=
    er to=20
    the political debates that going on in England and the rest of Europe a=
    t=20
    that time (RE: Thomas Paine and The Rights of Man) and not ! necessaril=
    y to=20
    America.=20
    <DIV class=3Dyiv17859317im><WBR>> <WBR>> > Also,=C3=82 I =
    kind of=20
    doubt that the Hispanola and uniface AP are just other varieties of=20
    the=C3=82 "usual" Conder token motif.=C3=82  I tend to think =
    that they are=20
    counterfeits of it, or evasions made by another hand - which would sugg=
    est=20
    that all were floating around England.=C3=82  I've bid (unsuccessf=
    ully)=20
    on=C3=82 a few=C3=82 of the "others" over the years and it se=
    ems as if they=20
    are almost always posted by British sellers, who often don't point out =
    the=20
    connection to the "American" Auctori Plebis tokens.=C3=82  Again, =
    the bottom=20
    line is that I'm not sure.<WBR>> <WBR>> > Another piece that I=
    find=20
    rather interesting is the evasion with TVRCVPELLERIVS / HISPANIOLA IK. =
    The=20
    IK initials seem somewhat analagous to IC, not to mention the Hispaniol=
    a=20
    (Haiti) similarity.=C3=82  Perhaps a Kempson?<WBR>> <WBR>> &=
    gt;=20
    Anyway, good question, worthy of research.<WBR>> <WBR>> >=20
    Thanks,<WBR>> <WBR>> > Will<WBR>> <WBR>> ><WBR>>=20
    <WBR></DIV>> >> Will,I have a piece very similar to yours tha!=
    t in=20
    in my SDBox. It is weird because I just got back from Branson and was=20
    cleaning my car out, when I stumbled onto the ebay receipt for the coin=
    , way=20
    down under the seats.I came in and checked my emails and there was Bryo=
    n's=20
    message which started this thread.I paid 99 bucks for mine which is pro=
    bably=20
    too high, but it was a BIN and I wanted it.I'll post a pix next time I =
    get=20
    tot the bank.As far as which coins should be considered American, I'm n=
    ot=20
    sure. Bob Vlack in his book included Cayenne 2 sous pieces only because=
    they=20
    were struck over the old Sous Marques of 24 deniers.However, why would =
    they=20
    not be considered colonial being struck by the French for their colony =
    in=20
    Guiana in the 1780 time frame. I'm pretty sure some of the people from =
    South=20
    America,as well as Central America, for that matter,consider themselves=
    =20
    Americans.I'll bet a lot of these still circulated in Canada and Nova=20
    Scotia.=C3=83=E2=80=9A=C3=82 Something<WBR>> <WBR>> > I &=
    gt; need to read up=20
    on.Marc > > --- On Sun, 12/30/12, books@... <books@...> wro=
    te:=20
    > ><WBR>> <WBR>> From: books@... <books@...> > Sub=
    ject:=20
    Re: [Colonial Numismatics] Re: DANSKE AMERICANSK > To: <A=20
    hre
Source URL Date published
  • 2013-02-20
Volume
  • 1

Relationships

NNP Author