Baby Head & the New Orbis EDAX - ED-XRF Analysis Öffentlichkeit Deposited
- From johnmenc@optonline.net Mon Jul 15 05:35:34 2013
Return-Path: <johnmenc@optonline.net>
X-Sender: johnmenc@optonline.net
X-Apparently-To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
X-Received: (qmail 12803 invoked by uid 102); 15 Jul 2013 12:35:33 -0000
X-Received: from unknown (HELO mtaq6.grp.bf1.yahoo.com) (10.193.84.37)
by m4.grp.bf1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 15 Jul 2013 12:35:33 -0000
X-Received: (qmail 20863 invoked from network); 15 Jul 2013 12:35:33 -0000
X-Received: from unknown (HELO ng24-vm2.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com) (66.196.80.49)
by mtaq6.grp.bf1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 15 Jul 2013 12:35:33 -0000
X-Received: from [98.139.164.124] by ng24.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 15 Jul 2013 12:35:33 -0000
X-Received: from [10.193.94.44] by tg5.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 15 Jul 2013 12:35:33 -0000
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 12:35:32 -0000
To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
Message-ID: <ks0qak+4tku@eGroups.com>
User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Yahoo Groups Message Poster
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: groups-compose
X-Originating-IP: 96.56.209.230
X-eGroups-Msg-Info: 2:3:4:0:0
X-Yahoo-Post-IP: 96.56.209.230
From: "colonialjohn" <johnmenc@optonline.net>
Subject: Baby Head & the New Orbis EDAX - ED-XRF Analysis
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=111282553; y=1xTAayczRUfFi-oQgZ3ohxTmE7_sbEChe7JMG4nA2s69Jd4H4f3dhJfh-g
X-Yahoo-Profile: colonial_john_c4
The new model is ready and ahead of schedule.
Send me the specimens.
Will analyze for trace silver and send you comparison results of Swedish Co=
pper 17thC Ore' results from my collection (~ 5 specimens).
Will use thee assay metals as the Moore specimen plus Ag.
As I mentioned to R. Moore the Baby head DOES NOT show conventional high Cu=
/low Bi as other British coins from this period. With French occupation her=
e is could relate to Swedish copper. Of course its difficult and never conc=
lusive with just XRF ... but more data is BETTER.
JPL - 2013-07-15
- 1
