DAVID GANZ ON THE MONACO CENTRAL AMERICA GOLD SEIZURE Öffentlichkeit Deposited

Artikelinhalt
  • The E-Sylum: Volume 9, Number 40, October 1, 2006, Article 8

    DAVID GANZ ON THE MONACO CENTRAL AMERICA GOLD SEIZURE

    Regarding last week's item about the seizure of Monaco Financial's
    artifacts from the Central America at the recent Long Beach coin
    show, David L. Ganz of Ganz & Hollinger, P.C writes: "What was behind
    the seizure is hard to grasp and relates to a law suit that Monaco
    Financial is not even a party to. That law suit is a dispute
    involving a claim by investors in Recovery Limited Partnership
    and Columbus Exploration, LLC, which first discovered the wreck
    of the S.S. Central America and then figured out how to extricate
    the treasure.

    Nine individual plaintiffs and International Deep Sea Survey, Inc.,
    brought suit earlier this year in Ohio State Court against Recovery
    Limited and Columbus Exploration, claiming that despite substantial
    recovery and sales efforts, they had been denied access to the
    partnership books and an accounting.

    The treasure salvors removed the case to the U.S. District Court
    in the Southern District of Ohio, a remedy they are allowed to do
    because of the nature of the claims under which a maritime contract
    was deemed a federal and not a state question. A series of
    ancillary proceedings have taken place in U.S. District Courts
    in New York and California, but the granddaddy of them all is
    located in the Eastern District of Virginia, where the S.S. Central
    America litigation has been ongoing for nearly 20 years.

    After finding the Central America, the group brought an "in rem"
    proceeding in admiralty seeking to establish ownership of and the
    right to salvage the ship and its cargo of gold and other artifacts.

    Under salvage law, the original owners still retain their ownership
    interests in such property. It competes with the law of finders
    which, in contrast, expresses the ancient and honorable principle
    of finders, keepers.

    Meanwhile, the financial backers claim they received no remuneration
    and asked that the Court issue process for attachment and garnishment
    in the amount of $11,909,880 "against all goods, chattles, credits...
    claimed by, being held for or on behalf of, or being transferred
    for the benefit of" the Columbus Group.

    This is without an adjudication by a Court of the complaint, because
    the same remedy was sought and executed on in a New York Court as
    well as the Monaco seizure. Hundreds of documents are on file in
    the federal directory, some of which are sealed, others of which,
    including the operating agreement of the venture, are claims to
    be secret but are now available for viewing.

    Monaco, for its part, claims it bought the ingots outright and
    that the Columbus group has no financial interest in the gold
    ingots which, by weight alone - numismatic value not considered
    - has a bullion worth exceeding $3-million. Stay tuned."

Quell-URL Veröffentlichungsdatum
  • 2006-10-01
Volumen
  • 9

Beziehungen

NNP-Autor