NUMISMATICS AND THE POLITICS OF SEPARATIST STATES Public Deposited

Article content
  • The E-Sylum: Volume 9, Number 41, October 8, 2006, Article 14

    NUMISMATICS AND THE POLITICS OF SEPARATIST STATES

    Concerning the collision of numismatics and politics discussed in
    last week's E-Sylum, Ralf W. Boepple of Stuttgart, Germany writes:
    "I think where Garry Saint's problem stems from is the fact that
    on the "catalog Index" page of his website, he lists all entries
    without making a difference between official countries, fantasy
    states, political entities that no longer exist, or, as in the
    cases discussed, separatist entities.

    Entries are in alphabetical order, and he even assigns them flags,
    where possible. On first sight, this can easily be mistaken as
    recognition of the entities in question as independent countries,
    or at least as a strong support for their cause.

    To come back to one of the examples, Abkhasia, it would be better
    to list it under the entry for Georgia, along with a short explanation
    of its international status and the history that led to the printing
    of the notes.
    Should independence be recognized, at one point in the future, the
    new country would then get its separate entry.

    There is no doubt that such issues should be included in the list,
    especially if there is proof that they served, or serve, as means
    of payment to some extent. Even if they were only printed as
    "commemorative" pieces, I would see a case, at least more than
    with the abundant fantasy issues by pseudo-states. However, not
    only to avoid "political" problems, but also for the sake of
    correctness, completeness, and to enhance the usefulness of the
    website as a research tool, it should be clear for each entry from
    the beginning, that is, from the catalog index page on, what its
    exact status under international law is.

    Great homepage, by the way! I'm not a paper money collector, but
    it is definitely something I will frequently come back to for some
    interesting reading.

    Two more short comments: the province of Katanga did not break away
    from Nigeria, but from what was then the Belgian Congo, later Zaire,
    now the Democratic Republic of Congo. And Greece did not protest
    against Macedonian banknotes as such, but against the country calling
    itself "Macedonia" (which the Greek say is a province within their
    own territory). For that reason, Macedonia the country is officially
    called "Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia", or FYROM.

    On another discussion that has been held here in the E-Sylum, I can
    say that I am perfectly fine with the term "paper money", even if a
    note is not made of paper in the strict sense of the word. If you tell
    me "paper money", I know exactly what you mean. If you told me
    "printed money", I would actually rather think of cheques or bonds!"

Source URL Date published
  • 2006-10-08
Volume
  • 9

Relationships

NNP Author