Scanners 上市 Deposited
- From nrothschild1@home.com Mon Jun 19 12:02:04 2000
Return-Path: <nrothschild1@home.com>
Received: (qmail 19623 invoked from network); 19 Jun 2000 19:02:04 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by m1.onelist.org with QMQP; 19 Jun 2000 19:02:04 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mail.rdc1.md.home.com) (24.2.2.66) by mta2 with SMTP; 19 Jun 2000 19:02:04 -0000
Received: from CC594346BB ([24.5.89.143]) by mail.rdc1.md.home.com (InterMail vM.4.01.02.00 201-229-116) with SMTP id <20000619190203.BEWK26205.mail.rdc1.md.home.com@CC594346BB> for <colonial-coins@egroups.com>; Mon, 19 Jun 2000 12:02:03 -0700
Message-ID: <00a801bfda20$bf308560$8f590518@Domain>
Reply-To: "Neil Rothschild" <nrothschild1@home.com>
To: <colonial-coins@egroups.com>
References: <8ilo05+16nm@eGroups.com>
Subject: Scanners
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2000 15:01:09 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
From: "Neil Rothschild" <nrothschild1@home.com>
I am in the market for a new scanner to replace my 300 dpi visioneer. I was
ahppy with the visioneer but I see that it (and most new models) only
handle 12" paper size. I am looking for the following:
1) usb interface a must, parallel or scsi option would be nice.
2) At least 600x1200 optical res, preferably higher
3) 8.5x14" paper capacity
4) Fast scanning speed (this may be THE MOST important issue for me)
5)) $300 price range (or less)
Any input from anyone who has used a later model scanner would be
appreciated!
As some of you may know, I was assigned the task of managing the
digitization of the C4 library, comprised of 3500 photos. I plan on using
teenage slave labor for the effort, but this scanner is my first step in
preparation for the project. Scanning speed is most important to me (do the
math and see what I mean?).
Does anyone know if USB is faster/slower/same transfer rate (real world) as
SCSI???
Neil - 2000-06-19
- 1
