ID of GLORIUVS III VIS = Woods 33 ? Pubblico Deposited

Re

Contenuto dell'articolo
  • From joshalso2000@yahoo.com Tue Jul 17 06:08:01 2001
    Return-Path: <joshalso2000@yahoo.com>
    X-Sender: joshalso2000@yahoo.com
    X-Apparently-To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
    Received: (EGP: mail-7_2_0); 17 Jul 2001 13:08:01 -0000
    Received: (qmail 95631 invoked from network); 17 Jul 2001 13:06:47 -0000
    Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by l7.egroups.com with QMQP; 17 Jul 2001 13:06:47 -0000
    Received: from unknown (HELO mr.egroups.com) (10.1.1.37) by mta1 with SMTP; 17 Jul 2001 13:06:47 -0000
    X-eGroups-Return: joshalso2000@yahoo.com
    Received: from [10.1.2.101] by mr.egroups.com with NNFMP; 17 Jul 2001 13:06:46 -0000
    Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 13:06:44 -0000
    To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
    Subject: Re: ID of GLORIUVS III VIS = Woods 33 ?
    Message-ID: <9j1d94+10d48@eGroups.com>
    In-Reply-To: <00ab01c10e75$caa41d00$510afea9@nichols>
    User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82
    MIME-Version: 1.0
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
    Content-Length: 3270
    X-Mailer: eGroups Message Poster
    X-Originating-IP: 205.188.197.178
    From: joshalso2000@yahoo.com

    Gord -

    Thank you very much for your response and the pictures. After
    looking at your pictures, my coin, I am lead to believe that the
    second letter is definitely "L" and not "E" as I've been advised
    outside of this group.

    Believe also that the correct legend is "GLORIUVS III. VIS."
    Looking at your scanned group, looking at my coin the second O is too
    different from the first and is actually a U. The letter styling
    indicates that it is a "U". Of course somebody with an "AU" will
    come along and blow that theory out of the water.

    Think Mr. Wood is correct in the assumption that the reverse legend
    is "BITIT". Spent -4- hours last night checking this.

    However, it must be noted that "assume" breaks down into "ASS-U-Me"
    and I've been on the south end of the North bound Jackass many times.

    Gord, thank you very much for the assistance and the pictures. This
    along with comments by George Fuld and others at least clarifies some
    to the mystery. I look forward to reading the monograph as
    referenced on these.

    Morris


    --- In colonial-coins@y..., "Gord Nichols" <g.nichols@s...> wrote:
    > Morris
    > Here is a scan of some of these coppery discs that I so fondly
    call "Wood 33". I believe they are common. Wood reported the
    spelling "GLORIOVS III. VIS." So apparently he never saw an "E". I
    have heard it said that the second letter on the reverse is an R.
    Nicer specimens that I have seen do show at least the lower crossbar
    emerging. Wood left the inscription open to speculation and put
    forth "BITIT" for consideration. I have noticed two die states I
    think due to rust, leaving to debate any specific date attribution in
    my mind at least. I had heard that "Wood 33" was deleted from the
    Blacksmith lineup a long time ago. I would think it still has a place
    in the Evasion category though.
    > I hope this adds to any confusion.
    > Gord
    >
    > Byron
    > I don't have a copy of Atkins. What number is it in Cobwright? I
    can't find it under any spelling.
    > Gord
    > ----- Original Message -----
    > From: joshalso2000@y...
    > To: colonial-coins@y...
    > Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 10:04 PM
    > Subject: [Colonial Numismatics] Re: ID of GEORIUVS III VIS
    >
    >
    > QUESTION:
    >
    > Did this particular type have a sub type or type 2 that read
    GLORIUVS?
    >
    > Or, is my coin so worn that the E appears to be an L ?
    >
    > What is the legend on the reverse, and do you have a better pic
    of
    > this varitey?
    >
    > Approximately what was the date of this variety ?
    >
    > If the Wood 33 is deleted, what is it to be deleted to. What
    will it
    > then be attributed to ?
    >
    > --- In colonial-coins@y..., george fuld <fuld1@h...> wrote:
    > > I believe the "so-called" Woods 33 is not a Blacksmith--Mossman
    and
    > > Charles Smith have found dozens in the Maine area. In the
    > forthcoming
    > > monograph Tayman and I are preparing, Wood 33 will undoubtedly
    be
    > > deleted.
    > >
    > > Geprge Fuld
    > >
    > > Gord Nichols wrote:
    > > >
    > > > Part 1.1 Type: Plain Text (text/plain)
    > > > Encoding: quoted-printable
    >
    >
    > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    > colonial-coins-unsubscribe@egroups.com
    >
    >
    >
    > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
    Service.

URL di origine Data di pubblicazione
  • 2001-07-17
Volume
  • 1

Le relazioni

Autore NNP