[Colonial Numismatics] Questionable 1776 Machins Mills? Pubblico Deposited
Re
- From ershye@aol.com Sun Sep 02 19:11:06 2001
Return-Path: <Ershye@aol.com>
X-Sender: Ershye@aol.com
X-Apparently-To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_2); 3 Sep 2001 02:11:03 -0000
Received: (qmail 61614 invoked from network); 3 Sep 2001 02:11:02 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26)
by l10.egroups.com with QMQP; 3 Sep 2001 02:11:02 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO imo-r09.mx.aol.com) (152.163.225.105)
by mta1 with SMTP; 3 Sep 2001 02:11:02 -0000
Received: from Ershye@aol.com
by imo-r09.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v31_r1.4.) id r.16a.37c7c5 (4367)
for <colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com>; Sun, 2 Sep 2001 22:10:55 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <16a.37c7c5.28c440af@aol.com>
Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2001 22:10:55 EDT
Subject: Re: [Colonial Numismatics] Questionable 1776 Machins Mills?
To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_16a.37c7c5.28c440af_boundary"
X-Mailer: AOL 6.0 for Windows US sub 10536
From: ershye@aol.com
--part1_16a.37c7c5.28c440af_boundary
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Hi Ray. Not only is that not a Machins Mills piece but it is a 1775
counterfeit as well. The five in the date is slanted in this variety so if it
is not completely full and bold it gives the impression of being a six.
Ed
--part1_16a.37c7c5.28c440af_boundary
Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<HTML><FONT FACE=arial,helvetica><FONT SIZE=2>Hi Ray. Not only is that not a Machins Mills piece but it is a 1775
<BR>counterfeit as well. The five in the date is slanted in this variety so if it
<BR>is not completely full and bold it gives the impression of being a six.
<BR>
<BR>Ed</FONT></HTML>
--part1_16a.37c7c5.28c440af_boundary-- - 2001-09-02
- 1
