Ogden proposal Public Deposited
[Colonial Numismatics] Re
Re
- From auctoricon@attbi.com Wed Jan 23 09:38:51 2002
Return-Path: <auctoricon@attbi.com>
X-Sender: auctoricon@attbi.com
X-Apparently-To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_1_3); 23 Jan 2002 17:38:51 -0000
Received: (qmail 32491 invoked from network); 23 Jan 2002 17:38:50 -0000
Received: from unknown (216.115.97.167)
by m3.grp.snv.yahoo.com with QMQP; 23 Jan 2002 17:38:50 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO rwcrmhc52.attbi.com) (216.148.227.88)
by mta1.grp.snv.yahoo.com with SMTP; 23 Jan 2002 17:38:50 -0000
Received: from [12.224.138.191] by rwcrmhc52.attbi.com
(InterMail vM.4.01.03.27 201-229-121-127-20010626) with ESMTP
id <20020123173850.DGYT3578.rwcrmhc52.attbi.com@[12.224.138.191]>
for <colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com>;
Wed, 23 Jan 2002 17:38:50 +0000
User-Agent: Microsoft-Outlook-Express-Macintosh-Edition/5.02.2022
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 09:38:47 -0800
Subject: Re: [Colonial Numismatics] Re: Ogden proposal
To: <colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com>
Message-ID: <B8743526.24DF5%auctoricon@attbi.com>
In-Reply-To: <a2mr0l+2vkk@eGroups.com>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
From: rob retz <auctoricon@attbi.com>
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=90017851
X-Yahoo-Profile: fugio1787
Several proposals to coin copper for the US government were made prior to
those made relative to the Fugio contract. In 1782 the London firm of
Bridgen & Waller submitted a proposal via John Adams, then Ambassador to the
Netherlands. In 1785 a proposal was submitted to congress by one T.H.
Walden. I have a copy of Peter Allair's proposal dated 22 Dec 1785 - I'm
not sure right now whether he submitted a second proposal two years later or
his 1785 proposal was included in the consideration of the Fugio contract.
I also have copies of Ogden's proposal (23 Mar 1787) and Jarvis' (Nov.
1786). I have copies of all these proposals in original hand. If there is
any interest, and when I can find the time, I can transcribe them for the
group.
Rob - 2002-01-23
- 1