_R-40=3F_=93unique=94_=93Baby_Face=94_1773/2/1=3F?= Public Deposited
=?iso-8859-1?q?Re
- From bkweston@lazerlink.com Mon Sep 30 09:15:56 2002
Return-Path: <bkweston@lazerlink.com>
X-Sender: bkweston@lazerlink.com
X-Apparently-To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_1_1_4); 30 Sep 2002 16:15:55 -0000
Received: (qmail 67254 invoked from network); 30 Sep 2002 16:15:46 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218)
by m10.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 30 Sep 2002 16:15:46 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO n18.grp.scd.yahoo.com) (66.218.66.73)
by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 30 Sep 2002 16:15:46 -0000
Received: from [66.218.67.152] by n18.grp.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 30 Sep 2002 16:15:46 -0000
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 16:15:45 -0000
To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?Re:_R-40=3F_=93unique=94_=93Baby_Face=94_1773/2/1=3F?=
Message-ID: <an9tbh+f5hb@eGroups.com>
In-Reply-To: <an9n7h+jeue@eGroups.com>
User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Length: 1022
X-Mailer: Yahoo Groups Message Poster
From: "Byron K. Weston" <bkweston@lazerlink.com>
X-Originating-IP: 24.54.148.61
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=90999161
X-Yahoo-Profile: bkweston
--- In colonial-coins@y..., "Clement V. Schettino (Clem)"
<CopperClem@a...> wrote:
> John,
>
> For your information I have identified MANY duplicate counterfeit
> British and Irish halfpence in my own collection and have seen
many
> more identical varieties, as a matter of fact I own an example of
> your "unique" "Baby Face" 1773/2/1, as does Mike R. It belongs to
a
> rather large Family of counterfeits and I consider the date to be
a
> blundered 1773. But that is merely my opinion.
>
> Clem
Yes, I recognized the variety as well, and agree that the date is
more of a blunder than an overdate, per se. Ditto on your duplicates
comment as well, Clem.
John, the starting time of your lot posts show around 6:30PST, which
should have been around 9:30EST, but they did not show up eBay until
after I went to bed, I assume, as they weren't there until this
morning. Why is that?
Also, I notice that Bill did not separate out one of the 1770-dated
counterfeit halfpence for separate sale - too bad!
Byron - 2002-09-30
- 1
