RE Public Deposited

[Colonial Numismatics] Choice Wood 17

Article content
  • From CopperClem@attbi.com Sun Oct 20 20:44:14 2002
    Return-Path: <copperclem@attbi.com>
    X-Sender: copperclem@attbi.com
    X-Apparently-To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
    Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_2_1); 21 Oct 2002 03:44:11 -0000
    Received: (qmail 44173 invoked from network); 21 Oct 2002 03:44:10 -0000
    Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217)
    by m9.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 21 Oct 2002 03:44:10 -0000
    Received: from unknown (HELO rwcrmhc53.attbi.com) (204.127.198.39)
    by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 21 Oct 2002 03:44:13 -0000
    Received: from dad ([24.61.97.225]) by rwcrmhc53.attbi.com
    (InterMail vM.4.01.03.27 201-229-121-127-20010626) with SMTP
    id <20021021034413.GFAG22897.rwcrmhc53.attbi.com@dad>
    for <colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com>;
    Mon, 21 Oct 2002 03:44:13 +0000
    To: <colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com>
    Subject: RE: [Colonial Numismatics] Choice Wood 17
    Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 23:43:28 -0400
    Message-ID: <LPBBKJNANGIPBNPALMHPGEKNDBAA.copperclem@attbi.com>
    MIME-Version: 1.0
    Content-Type: text/plain;
    charset="Windows-1252"
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
    X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
    X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
    X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
    X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
    In-Reply-To: <00eb01c278ab$ade06420$d2039618@scwe2.on.cogeco.ca>
    Importance: Normal
    From: "Clement V. Schettino" <CopperClem@attbi.com>
    X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=99160351
    X-Yahoo-Profile: copperclem

    Well this is confusing! When I first attributed it I used Taylor. It matched
    W-17 right down to the bits of fragmented detail and as I said compared
    favorably. Now I open Charlton and see a picture of a supposed W-17 with
    similar obverse detail and tons more reverse detail? I don't get it. If
    Taylor's was finest know then this W-17 in Charlton must be a composite, as
    he does mention that 16 and 17 share the same reverse. But like I said, I'm
    new to this series and very tired right now. I'll give it more thought
    tomorrow.

    Good night,
    Clem

    -----Original Message-----
    From: Gord Nichols [mailto:gnichols@cogeco.ca]
    Sent: Sunday, October 20, 2002 10:44 PM
    To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
    Subject: Re: [Colonial Numismatics] Choice Wood 17

    I'd like to see it Clem.
    Here's a Wood 25 I got recently.
    Gord
    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "Clement V. Schettino" <CopperClem@attbi.com>
    To: "C4" <colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com>
    Sent: Sunday, October 20, 2002 10:39 PM
    Subject: [Colonial Numismatics] Choice Wood 17


    > I kinda remember someone asking about Blacksmith Tokens and I think it was
    > on this egroup? It went in one ear and out the other at the time since I
    > only have a small handful at best. But, I did just pick up a small
    > collection of counterfeits and included was a Wood 17 that compares
    > favorably (maybe slightly nicer) with the Taylor specimen, which is
    > supposedly the finest known.
    >
    > If it was here and you would like to see it I'll try and get you a good
    > scan, with a digital image to follow at some point. Just let me know.
    >
    > Clem
    >
    >
    >
    > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    > colonial-coins-unsubscribe@egroups.com
    >
    >
    >
    > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
    >
    >


    To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    colonial-coins-unsubscribe@egroups.com



    Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Source URL Date published
  • 2002-10-20
Volume
  • 1

Relationships

NNP Author