文章內容 |
- From freidus@wwnet.net Thu Oct 24 12:30:01 2002
Return-Path: <freidus@wwnet.net> X-Sender: freidus@wwnet.net X-Apparently-To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_2_1); 24 Oct 2002 19:29:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 38915 invoked from network); 24 Oct 2002 19:29:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217) by m9.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 24 Oct 2002 19:29:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ziggy.wwnet.net) (209.142.193.4) by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 24 Oct 2002 19:30:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 22544 invoked from network); 24 Oct 2002 19:41:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?64.27.204.141?) (64.27.204.141) by ziggy.wwnet.net with SMTP; 24 Oct 2002 19:41:33 -0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: freidus@mail.wwnet.net Message-Id: <f04310100b9ddf9b16e92@[209.142.215.74]> In-Reply-To: <11.c4826b.2ae98a71@aol.com> References: <11.c4826b.2ae98a71@aol.com> Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 15:29:54 -0400 To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [Colonial Numismatics] Willow/NE Shilling is Phony Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="============_-1176634697==_ma============" From: Dan Freidus <freidus@wwnet.net> X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=5432296 X-Yahoo-Profile: dfreidus
--============_-1176634697==_ma============ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed"
I have not followed the courts' interpretation of the Hobby protection Act, since there has been virtually none. But the act does NOT apply to US items only. It clearly covers colonial coins. It covers any "numismatic item" but excludes any "re-issue or re-strike of any original numismatric item by the United States or any foreign government."
Is there a citation for the fugio case? Proving when something was made or imported is another issue...
Dan
At 1:40 PM -0400 10/24/02, Rosaamltd@aol.com wrote: >Hi Syd. One of the problems here is that it is NOT illegal to sell >copies that aren't marked with the "COPY" stamp. First off, the >seller is purporting these to be of the 19th century or early 20th >centruy, long before the Hobby Protection Act was passed -- and >there is no provision that earlier copies need to be marked as such. >Now, regardless of whether we believe that his pieces are being very >recently made, there is simply no real way to PROVE that they are >newly produced. Secondly, the Hobby Protection Act ONLY applies to >US coins...it does NOT cover colonial issues. Ironically, one of >the cases that actually went to court over it involved a 1787 Fugio >copper which did not have the "COPY" stamp -- the decision reached >was that only official US coinage was subject to the terms of the >Act -- even though the Fugio's could have been argued as one of the >first official coinages by the new nation!... >Jeff Rock >Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ADVERTISEMENT ><http://rd.yahoo.com/M=212804.2460941.3878106.2273195/D=egroupweb/S=1705062281:HM/A=810373/R=0/*http://geocities.yahoo.com/ps/info?.refer=blrecs> ><http://rd.yahoo.com/M=212804.2460941.3878106.2273195/D=egroupweb/S=1705062281:HM/A=810373/R=1/*http://geocities.yahoo.com/ps/info?.refer=blrecs> > >To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: >colonial-coins-unsubscribe@egroups.com > > > >Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the ><http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>Yahoo! Terms of Service.
--============_-1176634697==_ma============ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"
<!doctype html public "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN"> <html><head><style type="text/css"><!-- blockquote, dl, ul, ol, li { margin-top: 0 ; margin-bottom: 0 } --></style><title>Re: [Colonial Numismatics] Willow/NE Shilling is Phony</title></head><body> <div>I have not followed the courts' interpretation of the Hobby protection Act, since there has been virtually none. But the act does NOT apply to US items only. It clearly covers colonial coins. It covers any "numismatic item" but excludes any "re-issue or re-strike of any original numismatric item by the United States or any foreign government."</div> <div><br></div> <div>Is there a citation for the fugio case? Proving when something was made or imported is another issue... </div> <div><br></div> <div>Dan</div> <div><br></div> <div>At 1:40 PM -0400 10/24/02, Rosaamltd@aol.com wrote:</div> <blockquote type="cite" cite><font face="Arial" size="-1">Hi Syd. One of the problems here is that it is NOT illegal to sell copies that aren't marked with the "COPY" stamp. First off, the seller is purporting these to be of the 19th century or early 20th centruy, long before the Hobby Protection Act was passed -- and there is no provision that earlier copies need to be marked as such. Now, regardless of whether we believe that his pieces are being very recently made, there is simply no real way to PROVE that they are newly produced. Secondly, the Hobby Protection Act ONLY applies to US coins...it does NOT cover colonial issues. Ironically, one of the cases that actually went to court over it involved a 1787 Fugio copper which did not have the "COPY" stamp -- the decision reached was that only official US coinage was subject to the terms of the Act -- even though the Fugio's could have been argued as one of the first official coinages by the new nation!...</font></blockquote> <blockquote type="cite" cite><font face="Arial" size="-1">Jeff Rock</font><font face="Arial"><br> <font size="-1" color="#003399"><b>Yahoo! Groups Sponsor</b></font></font><font face="Arial" size="-2"> ADVERTISEMENT</font><font face="Arial"><br> </font><a href="http://rd.yahoo.com/M=212804.2460941.3878106.2273195/D=egroupweb/S=1705062281:HM/A=810373/R=0/*http://geocities.yahoo.com/ps/info?.refer=blrecs" ><img src="http://us.a1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/a/ya/yahoo_geocities/lrec2b_1_01.jpg" width="185" height="250"></a> <a href="http://rd.yahoo.com/M=212804.2460941.3878106.2273195/D=egroupweb/S=1705062281:HM/A=810373/R=1/*http://geocities.yahoo.com/ps/info?.refer=blrecs" ><img src="http://us.a1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/a/ya/yahoo_geocities/lrec2d_2_02.gif" width="115" height="250"><img src="http://us.adserver.yahoo.com/l?M=212804.2460941.3878106.2273195/D=egroupmail/S=:HM/A=810373/rand=237943291" alt="us.adserver.yahoo.com/5D2AFF75" width="1" height="1"><font face="Arial"><br> </font><tt>To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:<br> colonial-coins-unsubscribe@egroups.com<br> <br> </tt><font face="Arial"><br> <br> </font><tt>Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the</tt></a> <a href="http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/"><tt>Yahoo! Terms of Service</tt></a><tt>.</tt></blockquote> <div><br></div> </body> </html> --============_-1176634697==_ma============--
|
來源網址 |
|
發布日期 |
|
體積 |
|