[Colonial Numismatics] Wood-17?

Conteúdo do artigo

From gnichols@cogeco.ca Fri Oct 25 12:00:02 2002
Return-Path: <gnichols@cogeco.ca>
X-Sender: gnichols@cogeco.ca
X-Apparently-To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_2_1); 25 Oct 2002 18:59:55 -0000
Received: (qmail 39101 invoked from network); 25 Oct 2002 18:59:55 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218)
by m12.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 25 Oct 2002 18:59:55 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO fep3.cogeco.net) (216.221.81.25)
by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 25 Oct 2002 18:59:55 -0000
Received: from default (d150-3-210.home.cgocable.net [24.150.3.210])
by fep3.cogeco.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 5B1862110
for <colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com>; Fri, 25 Oct 2002 14:59:53 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <001701c27c58$81dce960$d2039618@scwe2.on.cogeco.ca>
To: <colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com>
References: <apc2ju+sdlp@eGroups.com>
Subject: Re: [Colonial Numismatics] Wood-17?
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 14:58:29 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0014_01C27C36.FA914DA0"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600
From: "Gord Nichols" <gnichols@cogeco.ca>
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=93054328
X-Yahoo-Profile: tokengord

------=_NextPart_000_0014_01C27C36.FA914DA0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Marc
I calls 'em as I sees 'em.
Gord
----- Original Message -----=20
From: Marcus M. Mayhugh=20
To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com=20
Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 2:30 PM
Subject: Re: [Colonial Numismatics] Wood-17?

---
Gord,
That little ski man is pretty cool. ;-)

Marc

In colonial-coins@y..., "Gord Nichols" <gnichols@c...> wrote:
> Hi Clem
>=20
> That is a Wood 17. Check the bow and ribands(ribbons). They appear=20
as if they are a little man bending to tie his ski boots.????? The=20
point is that on Wood 17(and 18) the little man's back follows the=20
nape of George's neck exactly. There is a narrow (always the same=20
width) channel between the little man's back and the back or nape of=20
George's neck.=20
>=20
> Check a Wood 16 (or the Charlton photo of a Wood 17 which is a Wood=20
16) at the bow and ribbons. The 'little man's' back has 2 huge=20
triangular points in it and doesn't follow the nape of George's neck=20
at all. Also on Wood 16 the 'little man' has a crook in his neck.
>=20
> With respect to your lack of detail on the lower part of the=20
reverse perhaps you have a different die rotation. If you check the=20
scan of the Wood 25 I sent against the Baker speciman in the Taylor=20
catalog you will note that the Baker speciman has no detail on the=20
bottom of the obverse and mine has plenty. Mine is a 90 degrees=20
rotation while I think most previously known specimans were coin=20
turn. Die rotation does matter.
>=20
> Or perhaps yours is just weakly struck. I have noticed what appears=20
to be a wide varience in striking pressure with many of the commoner=20
blacksmiths. Of relatively high grade looking pieces some will appear=20
to be flat with almost zero relief while others have plenty of relief=20
but still no details. Any details on the reverse of a Wood 17 are=20
shallowly cut at best and a specimen must be well struck to show them.
>=20
> I hope this is of some help.
> Gord
> ----- Original Message -----=20
> From: Clement V. Schettino=20
> To: C4=20
> Cc: Clem at Work=20
> Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 7:36 AM
> Subject: [Colonial Numismatics] Wood-17?
>=20
>=20
> Hey Gord,
>=20
> Well I suppose this image makes my claims look pretty weak, but=20
it's the
> best I could get with a scanner. I had to way over lighten to=20
show the
> detail I did. There is considerably more detail on the bust and a=20
bit more
> on the nose, as well as on the reverse, especially at the spray=20
and below
> that arm. All that "stuff" that looks like dirt, is dirt. I've=20
got some Blue
> Ribbon on it trying to soften it up.
>=20
> In "the brass" the coin appears quite choice, and I'm happy with=20
it anyway.
>=20
> But it is a 17, right?
>=20
> Clem
>=20
> Yahoo! Groups Sponsor=20
> ADVERTISEMENT
>=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20
>=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20
>=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20
>=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20
>=20
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> colonial-coins-unsubscribe@e...
>=20
>=20
>=20
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of=20
Service.

Yahoo! Groups Sponsor=20
ADVERTISEMENT
=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20
=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20
=20=20=20=20=20=20=20
=20=20=20=20=20=20=20

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
colonial-coins-unsubscribe@egroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.=20

------=_NextPart_000_0014_01C27C36.FA914DA0
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content=3D"text/html; charset=3Diso-8859-1" http-equiv=3DContent-Type=
>
<META content=3D"MSHTML 5.00.2919.6307" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV>Marc</DIV>
<DIV>I calls 'em as I sees 'em.</DIV>
<DIV>Gord</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE=20
style=3D"BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0p=
x; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV=20
style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black">Fro=
m:=20
<A href=3D"mailto:1-mar@mindspring.com" title=3D1-mar@mindspring.com>Marc=
us M.=20
Mayhugh</A> </DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">To: <A=20
href=3D"mailto:colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com"=20
title=3Dcolonial-coins@yahoogroups.com>colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com</A>=
</DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 2:3=
0=20
PM</DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">Subject: Re: [Colonial Numismatics=
]=20
Wood-17?</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV><TT>--- Gord, That little ski man is pretty cool.=20
;-) Marc In <A=20
href=3D"mailto:colonial-coins@y...">colonial-coins@y...</A>, "Gord Nichol=
s"=20
<<A href=3D"mailto:gnichols@c...">gnichols@c...</A>> wrote: >=
Hi=20
Clem > > That is a Wood 17. Check the bow and ribands(ribbon=
s).=20
They appear as if they are a little man bending to tie his ski boots.=
?????=20
The point is that on Wood 17(and 18) the little man's back follows th=
e=20
 nape of George's neck exactly. There is a narrow (always the same=20
 width) channel between the little man's back and the back or nape of=
=20
 George's neck. > > Check a Wood 16 (or the Charlton pho=
to of=20
a Wood 17 which is a Wood 16) at the bow and ribbons. The 'little man=
's'=20
back has 2 huge triangular points in it and doesn't follow the nape o=
f=20
George's neck at all. Also on Wood 16 the 'little man' has a crook in=
his=20
neck. > > With respect to your lack of detail on the lower p=
art=20
of the reverse perhaps you have a different die rotation. If you chec=
k the=20
 scan of the Wood 25 I sent against the Baker speciman in the Taylor=20
 catalog you will note that the Baker speciman has no detail on the=20
 bottom of the obverse and mine has plenty. Mine is a 90 degrees=20
 rotation while I think most previously known specimans were coin =
turn.=20
Die rotation does matter. > > Or perhaps yours is just weakl=
y=20
struck. I have noticed what appears to be a wide varience in striking=
=20
pressure with many of the commoner blacksmiths. Of relatively high gr=
ade=20
looking pieces some will appear to be flat with almost zero relief wh=
ile=20
others have plenty of relief but still no details. Any details on the=
=20
reverse of a Wood 17 are shallowly cut at best and a specimen must be=
well=20
struck to show them. > > I hope this is of some help. >=
;=20
Gord > ----- Original Message ----- > =
;=20
From: Clement V. Schettino > To: C4 > &nbs=
p;=20
Cc: Clem at Work > Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 7:36=
=20
AM > Subject: [Colonial Numismatics] Wood-17? >=20
 > > Hey Gord, > > Well=
I=20
suppose this image makes my claims look pretty weak, but it's=20
the > best I could get with a scanner. I had to way ove=
r=20
lighten to show the > detail I did. There is=20
considerably more detail on the bust and a bit more > &nbs=
p; on=20
the nose, as well as on the reverse, especially at the spray and=20
below > that arm. All that "stuff" that looks like dirt=
, is=20
dirt. I've got some Blue > Ribbon on it trying to s=
often=20
it up. > > In "the brass" the coin appears quite=
=20
choice, and I'm happy with it anyway. > > Bu=
t it=20
is a 17, right? > > Clem >=20
 > Yahoo! Groups Sp=
onsor=20
 > =
; =20
ADVERTISEMENT > &nbs=
p; =20
 > =
; =20
 > =20
 > >=20
 > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email=20
to: > colonial-coins-unsubscribe@e... > >=
=20
 > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the=
=20
Yahoo! Terms of Service. </TT> <TT>To=20
unsubscribe from this group, send an email=20
to: colonial-coins-unsubscribe@egroups.com </TT> <TT>You=
r use=20
of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the <A=20
href=3D"http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/">Yahoo! Terms of Service</A>.</=
TT>=20
 </BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>

------=_NextPart_000_0014_01C27C36.FA914DA0--

URL da fonte

https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/colonial-coins/info

Data de publicação

2002-10-25

Volume

[Colonial Numismatics] Wood-17? Público Deposited

Re

Relacionamentos

Autor do PNN