Contenuto dell'articolo |
- From joshalso2000@yahoo.com Mon Feb 17 17:53:36 2003
Return-Path: <joshalso2000@yahoo.com> X-Sender: joshalso2000@yahoo.com X-Apparently-To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_4); 18 Feb 2003 01:53:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 22374 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2003 01:53:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216) by m13.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 18 Feb 2003 01:53:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO web14208.mail.yahoo.com) (216.136.173.72) by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 18 Feb 2003 01:53:35 -0000 Message-ID: <20030218015335.97092.qmail@web14208.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [205.188.208.104] by web14208.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 17 Feb 2003 17:53:35 PST Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 17:53:35 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [Colonial Numismatics] Re: How Many Colonial Collectors are There? To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com In-Reply-To: <b2s1sh+1hko@eGroups.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1993433236-1045533215=:96731" From: Morris Hankins <joshalso2000@yahoo.com> X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=75343914 X-Yahoo-Profile: joshalso2000
--0-1993433236-1045533215=:96731 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Dave, see, you are a serious collector. I'm just a dabbler, I have exactly 50 varities, basically R-4s are my downfall. Oh, and since you are a serious collector, you can no longer use the term "bottom feeder" when it comes to NJ's. Morris "albioncox <wierzba@attbi.com>" <wierzba@attbi.com> wrote:You are definitely a serious NJ variety collector. The 25 NJ collectors may be a bit low based on responses so far.
-- In colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com, "David L. Palmer
" wrote: > Rarity rating on NJ collectors falls to R-5+, I also do not own a 71- > y, should have, but alas, could not. Just for the record, with 91 > varieties, I think I qualify as a "serious" NJ collector. Or did > someone delist a few varieties when I wasn't looking, again? David > > --- In colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com, "Clement V. Schettino" > wrote: > > Makes sense to me Dennis, and as support I must be the 25th NJ > collector, > > because I don't have my 71-y yet! > > > > Clem > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: albioncox [mailto:wierzba@a...] > > Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2003 8:06 PM > > To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com > > Subject: [Colonial Numismatics] Re: How Many Colonial Collectors > are There? > > > > For the record, I think NJ variety collectors are a low R6 > (includes > > museums, inactive collectors, etc.) at 25 or so. As support, the NJ > > 71-y has 23 to 24 distinct specimens known. The last public sale > (to > > the best of my knowledge) was Griffee in '95 (to yours truly). A > > private sale of a low grade specimen happened about a year later. > All > > the known pieces are likely sitting in variety collections (with > the > > one exception of the 71-y over the Vermont). Hence the low R6 > > estimate. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- In colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com, "David L. Palmer > > " wrote: > > > Just to follow thru on this, I think that Colonial collectors are > > R8 > > > vs. the rest of the collecting population. David > > > > > > > > > --- In colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com, "albioncox " > > > wrote: > > > > My guess is that the MEDIAN state coinage variety is R5+, say > 40 > > > > examples. Choice examples Vf-XF maybe 4-6 for the MEDIAN. Yes > > > > collecting only choice examples of state coinage varieties is > > very > > > > difficult. Hence the price pressure for this segment. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - In colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com, "colonialcoinunion > > > " > > > > wrote: > > > > > Actually I wasn't trying to further a 'slabs are good for > > > bringing > > > > > new people into the field' theory. Though for what its > worth I > > > > think > > > > > they do help reduce the intimidation factor as Dave Wnuck > > > mentioned. > > > > > > > > > > My reason for posting was that I am curious about how many > > > > collectors > > > > > the population of colonial coins can really sustain. > > > > > > > > > > I noted in a not so recent Bowers rare coin review that they > > > > remarked > > > > > about a particular colonial that 'it would be more valuable > and > > > > more > > > > > sought after if it wasn't so rare'. > > > > > > > > > > My now infamous colonial cc project is leading me to that > same > > > > > conclusion. It seems that if anything the population of nice > > > > > examples of a great many colonial types seems to be even > > smaller > > > > than > > > > > I would have imagined, as the same few examples keep re- > > > appearing > > > > > through the years in different auctions. > > > > > > > > > > If ~30 different types have populations of 20 or less > specimens > > > I > > > > > guess that means there can't be much more than a few dozen > high > > > end > > > > > type collectors or they'll be a lot of fighting over those > few > > > > > coins. Actually, that sounds about right. > > > > > > > > > > Which is to say nothing of the populations of different > > > varieties > > > > > Connecticuts or NJs or Mass silver, etc. > > > > > > > > > > JA > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com, Morris Hankins > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > Dave - don't set much store by my agreement. I am a > > > > > > neophyte when it comes to colonials. > > > > > > > > > > > > Wait until the experienced and hardcore colonialists > > > > > > check in. > > > > > > > > > > > > Morris > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- "coinrarities " > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hi Morris: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Whoa! You're freakin' me out! I didn't expect > > > > > > > anyone in the chat > > > > > > > room to agree with me about slabs. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Re my definition of hard core vs. dabbler > > > > > > > colonial collectors: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > HARD CORE: Have definate collecting goals in mind, > > > > > > > even if they are > > > > > > > dispirate (and even contridictory!). Regularly add > > > > > > > to their library, > > > > > > > or on-line store of knowledge. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > DABBLER: Will add a piece here or there if they see > > > > > > > it, it strikes > > > > > > > their fancy, and they have the discretionary funds. > > > > > > > May or may not > > > > > > > be a "club joiner". > > > > > > > > > > > > > > People can certainly drift from one catagory to the > > > > > > > other over time... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm sure others can refine these definitions. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rgds, > > > > > > > Dave W. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com, Morris > > > > > > > Hankins > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Dave, inclined to agree with you. I got my > > > > > > > baptism of > > > > > > > > fire on Large Cents. Now there is an area that > > > > > > > really > > > > > > > > needs cleaned up. These were not slabbed. Bob > > > > > > > > Grellman did the attributions and grading on them > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > most all were 20 points under their purported > > > > > > > grade. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have a bought a few colonials that were slabbed > > > > > > > as > > > > > > > > it seemed that they were either undervalued and > > > > > > > being > > > > > > > > ignored or people were away at shows. Most of > > > > > > > them > > > > > > > > were fairly close on grading, but a low grade > > > > > > > Machins > > > > > > > > turned out to be a Ctft Brit with a hugh die crack > > > > > > > > through the spray. They have now all been > > > > > > > liberated. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So yes, it will help some of the newbies get > > > > > > > started. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > However, my question is in regards to Your PSS. > > > > > > > > Please define your definition of hardcore and > > > > > > > > dabblers. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Morris > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- "coinrarities " > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > John: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sinerely, > > > > > > > > > Dave Wnuck > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > PPS: I guesstimate the number of hard-core > > > > > > > colonial > > > > > > > > > collectors at > > > > > > > > > about 200; add in the dabblers and you get to > > > > > > > 800 or > > > > > > > > > so. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com, > > > > > > > > > "colonialcoinunion > > > > > > > > > " wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Looking for a rough guess - and not just the > > > > > > > hard > > > > > > > > > core guys, but > > > > > > > > > > including the dabblers and the > > > > > > > toe-in-the-water > > > > > > > > > crowd. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > And the 2nd part of the question - does the > > > > > > > > > serious hard core group > > > > > > > > > > want to see new people coming into the > > > > > > > 'field'? > > > > > > > > > My sense is that > > > > > > > > > > there is not a great deal of enthusiasm for > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > novice or newby > > > > > > > > > > introduced to the field via, perhaps, slabbed > > > > > > > > > items. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JA > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email > > > > > > > to: > > > > > > > > > colonial-coins-unsubscribe@egroups.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to > > > > > > > > > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: > > > > > > > colonial-coins-unsubscribe@egroups.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to > > > > > > > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: > > colonial-coins-unsubscribe@egroups.com > > > > > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: colonial-coins-unsubscribe@egroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
--0-1993433236-1045533215=:96731 Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
<P><STRONG>Dave, see, you are a serious collector. I'm just a dabbler, I have exactly 50 varities, basically R-4s are my downfall.</STRONG> <P><STRONG>Oh, and since you are a serious collector, you can no longer use the term "bottom feeder" when it comes to NJ's.</STRONG> <P><STRONG>Morris</STRONG> <P> <B><I>"albioncox <wierzba@attbi.com>" <wierzba@attbi.com></I></B> wrote: <BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid">You are definitely a serious NJ variety collector. The 25 NJ <BR>collectors may be a bit low based on responses so far.<BR><BR><BR>-- In colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com, "David L. Palmer <BR><PALMERS4@E...>" <PALMERS4@E...>wrote:<BR>> Rarity rating on NJ collectors falls to R-5+, I also do not own a <BR>71-<BR>> y, should have, but alas, could not. Just for the record, with 91 <BR>> varieties, I think I qualify as a "serious" NJ collector. Or did <BR>> someone delist a few varieties when I wasn't looking, again? David<BR>> <BR>> --- In colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com, "Clement V. Schettino" <BR>> <COPPERCLEM@A...>wrote:<BR>> > Makes sense to me Dennis, and as support I must be the 25th NJ <BR>> collector,<BR>> > because I don't have my 71-y yet!<BR>> > <BR>> > Clem<BR>> > <BR>> > <BR>> > -----Original Message-----<BR>> > From: albioncox <WIERZBA@A...>[mailto:wierzba@a...]<BR>> > Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2003 8:06 PM<BR>> > To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com<BR>> > Subject: [Colonial Numismatics] Re: How Many Colonial Collectors <BR>> are There?<BR>> > <BR>> > For the record, I think NJ variety collectors are a low R6 <BR>> (includes<BR>> > museums, inactive collectors, etc.) at 25 or so. As support, the <BR>NJ<BR>> > 71-y has 23 to 24 distinct specimens known. The last public sale <BR>> (to<BR>> > the best of my knowledge) was Griffee in '95 (to yours truly). A<BR>> > private sale of a low grade specimen happened about a year later. <BR>> All<BR>> > the known pieces are likely sitting in variety collections (with <BR>> the<BR>> > one exception of the 71-y over the Vermont). Hence the low R6<BR>> > estimate.<BR>> > <BR>> > <BR>> > <BR>> > <BR>> > <BR>> > <BR>> > -- In colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com, "David L. Palmer<BR>> > <PALMERS4@E...>" <PALMERS4@E...>wrote:<BR>> > > Just to follow thru on this, I think that Colonial collectors <BR>are<BR>> > R8<BR>> > > vs. the rest of the collecting population.<BG> David<BR>> > ><BR>> > ><BR>> > > --- In colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com, "albioncox <BR><WIERZBA@A...>"<BR>> > > <WIERZBA@A...>wrote:<BR>> > > > My guess is that the MEDIAN state coinage variety is R5+, say <BR>> 40<BR>> > > > examples. Choice examples Vf-XF maybe 4-6 for the MEDIAN. Yes<BR>> > > > collecting only choice examples of state coinage varieties is<BR>> > very<BR>> > > > difficult. Hence the price pressure for this segment.<BR>> > > ><BR>> > > ><BR>> > > ><BR>> > > ><BR>> > > > - In colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com, "colonialcoinunion<BR>> > > <JAGRE@A...>"<BR>> > > > <JAGRE@A...>wrote:<BR>> > > > > Actually I wasn't trying to further a 'slabs are good for<BR>> > > bringing<BR>> > > > > new people into the field' theory. Though for what its <BR>> worth I<BR>> > > > think<BR>> > > > > they do help reduce the intimidation factor as Dave Wnuck<BR>> > > mentioned.<BR>> > > > ><BR>> > > > > My reason for posting was that I am curious about how many<BR>> > > > collectors<BR>> > > > > the population of colonial coins can really sustain.<BR>> > > > ><BR>> > > > > I noted in a not so recent Bowers rare coin review that they<BR>> > > > remarked<BR>> > > > > about a particular colonial that 'it would be more valuable <BR>> and<BR>> > > > more<BR>> > > > > sought after if it wasn't so rare'.<BR>> > > > ><BR>> > > > > My now infamous colonial cc project is leading me to that <BR>> same<BR>> > > > > conclusion. It seems that if anything the population of <BR>nice<BR>> > > > > examples of a great many colonial types seems to be even<BR>> > smaller<BR>> > > > than<BR>> > > > > I would have imagined, as the same few examples keep re-<BR>> > > appearing<BR>> > > > > through the years in different auctions.<BR>> > > > ><BR>> > > > > If ~30 different types have populations of 20 or less <BR>> specimens<BR>> > > I<BR>> > > > > guess that means there can't be much more than a few dozen <BR>> high<BR>> > > end<BR>> > > > > type collectors or they'll be a lot of fighting over those <BR>> few<BR>> > > > > coins. Actually, that sounds about right.<BR>> > > > ><BR>> > > > > Which is to say nothing of the populations of different<BR>> > > varieties<BR>> > > > > Connecticuts or NJs or Mass silver, etc.<BR>> > > > ><BR>> > > > > JA<BR>> > > > ><BR>> > > > ><BR>> > > > ><BR>> > > > ><BR>> > > > ><BR>> > > > > --- In colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com, Morris Hankins<BR>> > > > > <JOSHALSO2000@Y...>wrote:<BR>> > > > > > Dave - don't set much store by my agreement. I am a<BR>> > > > > > neophyte when it comes to colonials.<BR>> > > > > ><BR>> > > > > > Wait until the experienced and hardcore colonialists<BR>> > > > > > check in.<BR>> > > > > ><BR>> > > > > > Morris<BR>> > > > > ><BR>> > > > > ><BR>> > > > > ><BR>> > > > > > --- "coinrarities <COINRARITIES@Y...>"<BR>> > > > > > <COINRARITIES@Y...>wrote:<BR>> > > > > > > Hi Morris:<BR>> > > > > > ><BR>> > > > > > ><BR>> > > > > > > Whoa! You're freakin' me out! I didn't expect<BR>> > > > > > > anyone in the chat<BR>> > > > > > > room to agree with me about slabs.<BR>> > > > > > ><BR>> > > > > > ><BR>> > > > > > > Re my definition of hard core vs. dabbler<BR>> > > > > > > colonial collectors:<BR>> > > > > > ><BR>> > > > > > ><BR>> > > > > > > HARD CORE: Have definate collecting goals in mind,<BR>> > > > > > > even if they are<BR>> > > > > > > dispirate (and even contridictory!). Regularly add<BR>> > > > > > > to their library,<BR>> > > > > > > or on-line store of knowledge.<BR>> > > > > > ><BR>> > > > > > ><BR>> > > > > > > DABBLER: Will add a piece here or there if they see<BR>> > > > > > > it, it strikes<BR>> > > > > > > their fancy, and they have the discretionary funds.<BR>> > > > > > > May or may not<BR>> > > > > > > be a "club joiner".<BR>> > > > > > ><BR>> > > > > > > People can certainly drift from one catagory to the<BR>> > > > > > > other over time...<BR>> > > > > > ><BR>> > > > > > ><BR>> > > > > > > I'm sure others can refine these definitions.<BR>> > > > > > ><BR>> > > > > > > Rgds,<BR>> > > > > > > Dave W.<BR>> > > > > > ><BR>> > > > > > ><BR>> > > > > > > --- In colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com, Morris<BR>> > > > > > > Hankins<BR>> > > > > > > <JOSHALSO2000@Y...>wrote:<BR>> > > > > > > > Dave, inclined to agree with you. I got my<BR>> > > > > > > baptism of<BR>> > > > > > > > fire on Large Cents. Now there is an area that<BR>> > > > > > > really<BR>> > > > > > > > needs cleaned up. These were not slabbed. Bob<BR>> > > > > > > > Grellman did the attributions and grading on them<BR>> > > > > > > and<BR>> > > > > > > > most all were 20 points under their purported<BR>> > > > > > > grade.<BR>> > > > > > > ><BR>> > > > > > > > I have a bought a few colonials that were slabbed<BR>> > > > > > > as<BR>> > > > > > > > it seemed that they were either undervalued and<BR>> > > > > > > being<BR>> > > > > > > > ignored or people were away at shows. Most of<BR>> > > > > > > them<BR>> > > > > > > > were fairly close on grading, but a low grade<BR>> > > > > > > Machins<BR>> > > > > > > > turned out to be a Ctft Brit with a hugh die crack<BR>> > > > > > > > through the spray. They have now all been<BR>> > > > > > > liberated.<BR>> > > > > > > ><BR>> > > > > > > > So yes, it will help some of the newbies get<BR>> > > > > > > started.<BR>> > > > > > > ><BR>> > > > > > > > However, my question is in regards to Your PSS.<BR>> > > > > > > > Please define your definition of hardcore and<BR>> > > > > > > > dabblers.<BR>> > > > > > > ><BR>> > > > > > > > Thanks<BR>> > > > > > > ><BR>> > > > > > > > Morris<BR>> > > > > > > ><BR>> > > > > > > > --- "coinrarities <COINRARITIES@Y...>"<BR>> > > > > > > > <COINRARITIES@Y...>wrote:<BR>> > > > > > > > > John:<BR>> > > > > > > > ><BR>> > > > > > > > > Sinerely,<BR>> > > > > > > > > Dave Wnuck<BR>> > > > > > > > ><BR>> > > > > > > > > PPS: I guesstimate the number of hard-core<BR>> > > > > > > colonial<BR>> > > > > > > > > collectors at<BR>> > > > > > > > > about 200; add in the dabblers and you get to<BR>> > > > > > > 800 or<BR>> > > > > > > > > so.<BR>> > > > > > > > ><BR>> > > > > > > > ><BR>> > > > > > > > ><BR>> > > > > > > > ><BR>> > > > > > > > > --- In colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com,<BR>> > > > > > > > > "colonialcoinunion<BR>> > > > > > > > > <JAGRE@A...>" <JAGRE@A...>wrote:<
|