[Colonial Numismatics] Re 上市 Deposited

Re

How Many Colonial Collectors are There?

文章內容
  • From joshalso2000@yahoo.com Mon Feb 17 17:53:36 2003
    Return-Path: <joshalso2000@yahoo.com>
    X-Sender: joshalso2000@yahoo.com
    X-Apparently-To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
    Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_4); 18 Feb 2003 01:53:36 -0000
    Received: (qmail 22374 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2003 01:53:36 -0000
    Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216)
    by m13.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 18 Feb 2003 01:53:36 -0000
    Received: from unknown (HELO web14208.mail.yahoo.com) (216.136.173.72)
    by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 18 Feb 2003 01:53:35 -0000
    Message-ID: <20030218015335.97092.qmail@web14208.mail.yahoo.com>
    Received: from [205.188.208.104] by web14208.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 17 Feb 2003 17:53:35 PST
    Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 17:53:35 -0800 (PST)
    Subject: Re: [Colonial Numismatics] Re: How Many Colonial Collectors are There?
    To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
    In-Reply-To: <b2s1sh+1hko@eGroups.com>
    MIME-Version: 1.0
    Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1993433236-1045533215=:96731"
    From: Morris Hankins <joshalso2000@yahoo.com>
    X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=75343914
    X-Yahoo-Profile: joshalso2000

    --0-1993433236-1045533215=:96731
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii


    Dave, see, you are a serious collector. I'm just a dabbler, I have exactly 50 varities, basically R-4s are my downfall.
    Oh, and since you are a serious collector, you can no longer use the term "bottom feeder" when it comes to NJ's.
    Morris
    "albioncox <wierzba@attbi.com>" <wierzba@attbi.com> wrote:You are definitely a serious NJ variety collector. The 25 NJ
    collectors may be a bit low based on responses so far.


    -- In colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com, "David L. Palmer

    "
    wrote:
    > Rarity rating on NJ collectors falls to R-5+, I also do not own a
    71-
    > y, should have, but alas, could not. Just for the record, with 91
    > varieties, I think I qualify as a "serious" NJ collector. Or did
    > someone delist a few varieties when I wasn't looking, again? David
    >
    > --- In colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com, "Clement V. Schettino"
    > wrote:
    > > Makes sense to me Dennis, and as support I must be the 25th NJ
    > collector,
    > > because I don't have my 71-y yet!
    > >
    > > Clem
    > >
    > >
    > > -----Original Message-----
    > > From: albioncox [mailto:wierzba@a...]
    > > Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2003 8:06 PM
    > > To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
    > > Subject: [Colonial Numismatics] Re: How Many Colonial Collectors
    > are There?
    > >
    > > For the record, I think NJ variety collectors are a low R6
    > (includes
    > > museums, inactive collectors, etc.) at 25 or so. As support, the
    NJ
    > > 71-y has 23 to 24 distinct specimens known. The last public sale
    > (to
    > > the best of my knowledge) was Griffee in '95 (to yours truly). A
    > > private sale of a low grade specimen happened about a year later.
    > All
    > > the known pieces are likely sitting in variety collections (with
    > the
    > > one exception of the 71-y over the Vermont). Hence the low R6
    > > estimate.
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > > -- In colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com, "David L. Palmer
    > >
    "
    wrote:
    > > > Just to follow thru on this, I think that Colonial collectors
    are
    > > R8
    > > > vs. the rest of the collecting population. David
    > > >
    > > >
    > > > --- In colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com, "albioncox
    "
    > > > wrote:
    > > > > My guess is that the MEDIAN state coinage variety is R5+, say
    > 40
    > > > > examples. Choice examples Vf-XF maybe 4-6 for the MEDIAN. Yes
    > > > > collecting only choice examples of state coinage varieties is
    > > very
    > > > > difficult. Hence the price pressure for this segment.
    > > > >
    > > > >
    > > > >
    > > > >
    > > > > - In colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com, "colonialcoinunion
    > > > "
    > > > > wrote:
    > > > > > Actually I wasn't trying to further a 'slabs are good for
    > > > bringing
    > > > > > new people into the field' theory. Though for what its
    > worth I
    > > > > think
    > > > > > they do help reduce the intimidation factor as Dave Wnuck
    > > > mentioned.
    > > > > >
    > > > > > My reason for posting was that I am curious about how many
    > > > > collectors
    > > > > > the population of colonial coins can really sustain.
    > > > > >
    > > > > > I noted in a not so recent Bowers rare coin review that they
    > > > > remarked
    > > > > > about a particular colonial that 'it would be more valuable
    > and
    > > > > more
    > > > > > sought after if it wasn't so rare'.
    > > > > >
    > > > > > My now infamous colonial cc project is leading me to that
    > same
    > > > > > conclusion. It seems that if anything the population of
    nice
    > > > > > examples of a great many colonial types seems to be even
    > > smaller
    > > > > than
    > > > > > I would have imagined, as the same few examples keep re-
    > > > appearing
    > > > > > through the years in different auctions.
    > > > > >
    > > > > > If ~30 different types have populations of 20 or less
    > specimens
    > > > I
    > > > > > guess that means there can't be much more than a few dozen
    > high
    > > > end
    > > > > > type collectors or they'll be a lot of fighting over those
    > few
    > > > > > coins. Actually, that sounds about right.
    > > > > >
    > > > > > Which is to say nothing of the populations of different
    > > > varieties
    > > > > > Connecticuts or NJs or Mass silver, etc.
    > > > > >
    > > > > > JA
    > > > > >
    > > > > >
    > > > > >
    > > > > >
    > > > > >
    > > > > > --- In colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com, Morris Hankins
    > > > > > wrote:
    > > > > > > Dave - don't set much store by my agreement. I am a
    > > > > > > neophyte when it comes to colonials.
    > > > > > >
    > > > > > > Wait until the experienced and hardcore colonialists
    > > > > > > check in.
    > > > > > >
    > > > > > > Morris
    > > > > > >
    > > > > > >
    > > > > > >
    > > > > > > --- "coinrarities "
    > > > > > > wrote:
    > > > > > > > Hi Morris:
    > > > > > > >
    > > > > > > >
    > > > > > > > Whoa! You're freakin' me out! I didn't expect
    > > > > > > > anyone in the chat
    > > > > > > > room to agree with me about slabs.
    > > > > > > >
    > > > > > > >
    > > > > > > > Re my definition of hard core vs. dabbler
    > > > > > > > colonial collectors:
    > > > > > > >
    > > > > > > >
    > > > > > > > HARD CORE: Have definate collecting goals in mind,
    > > > > > > > even if they are
    > > > > > > > dispirate (and even contridictory!). Regularly add
    > > > > > > > to their library,
    > > > > > > > or on-line store of knowledge.
    > > > > > > >
    > > > > > > >
    > > > > > > > DABBLER: Will add a piece here or there if they see
    > > > > > > > it, it strikes
    > > > > > > > their fancy, and they have the discretionary funds.
    > > > > > > > May or may not
    > > > > > > > be a "club joiner".
    > > > > > > >
    > > > > > > > People can certainly drift from one catagory to the
    > > > > > > > other over time...
    > > > > > > >
    > > > > > > >
    > > > > > > > I'm sure others can refine these definitions.
    > > > > > > >
    > > > > > > > Rgds,
    > > > > > > > Dave W.
    > > > > > > >
    > > > > > > >
    > > > > > > > --- In colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com, Morris
    > > > > > > > Hankins
    > > > > > > > wrote:
    > > > > > > > > Dave, inclined to agree with you. I got my
    > > > > > > > baptism of
    > > > > > > > > fire on Large Cents. Now there is an area that
    > > > > > > > really
    > > > > > > > > needs cleaned up. These were not slabbed. Bob
    > > > > > > > > Grellman did the attributions and grading on them
    > > > > > > > and
    > > > > > > > > most all were 20 points under their purported
    > > > > > > > grade.
    > > > > > > > >
    > > > > > > > > I have a bought a few colonials that were slabbed
    > > > > > > > as
    > > > > > > > > it seemed that they were either undervalued and
    > > > > > > > being
    > > > > > > > > ignored or people were away at shows. Most of
    > > > > > > > them
    > > > > > > > > were fairly close on grading, but a low grade
    > > > > > > > Machins
    > > > > > > > > turned out to be a Ctft Brit with a hugh die crack
    > > > > > > > > through the spray. They have now all been
    > > > > > > > liberated.
    > > > > > > > >
    > > > > > > > > So yes, it will help some of the newbies get
    > > > > > > > started.
    > > > > > > > >
    > > > > > > > > However, my question is in regards to Your PSS.
    > > > > > > > > Please define your definition of hardcore and
    > > > > > > > > dabblers.
    > > > > > > > >
    > > > > > > > > Thanks
    > > > > > > > >
    > > > > > > > > Morris
    > > > > > > > >
    > > > > > > > > --- "coinrarities "
    > > > > > > > > wrote:
    > > > > > > > > > John:
    > > > > > > > > >
    > > > > > > > > > Sinerely,
    > > > > > > > > > Dave Wnuck
    > > > > > > > > >
    > > > > > > > > > PPS: I guesstimate the number of hard-core
    > > > > > > > colonial
    > > > > > > > > > collectors at
    > > > > > > > > > about 200; add in the dabblers and you get to
    > > > > > > > 800 or
    > > > > > > > > > so.
    > > > > > > > > >
    > > > > > > > > >
    > > > > > > > > >
    > > > > > > > > >
    > > > > > > > > > --- In colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com,
    > > > > > > > > > "colonialcoinunion
    > > > > > > > > > " wrote:
    > > > > > > > > > > Looking for a rough guess - and not just the
    > > > > > > > hard
    > > > > > > > > > core guys, but
    > > > > > > > > > > including the dabblers and the
    > > > > > > > toe-in-the-water
    > > > > > > > > > crowd.
    > > > > > > > > > >
    > > > > > > > > > > And the 2nd part of the question - does the
    > > > > > > > > > serious hard core group
    > > > > > > > > > > want to see new people coming into the
    > > > > > > > 'field'?
    > > > > > > > > > My sense is that
    > > > > > > > > > > there is not a great deal of enthusiasm for
    > > > > > > > the
    > > > > > > > > > novice or newby
    > > > > > > > > > > introduced to the field via, perhaps, slabbed
    > > > > > > > > > items.
    > > > > > > > > > >
    > > > > > > > > > > JA
    > > > > > > > > >
    > > > > > > > > >
    > > > > > > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email
    > > > > > > > to:
    > > > > > > > > > colonial-coins-unsubscribe@egroups.com
    > > > > > > > > >
    > > > > > > > > >
    > > > > > > > > >
    > > > > > > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
    > > > > > > > > > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
    > > > > > > > > >
    > > > > > > > > >
    > > > > > > >
    > > > > > > >
    > > > > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    > > > > > > > colonial-coins-unsubscribe@egroups.com
    > > > > > > >
    > > > > > > >
    > > > > > > >
    > > > > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
    > > > > > > > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
    > > > > > > >
    > > > > > > >
    > >
    > >
    > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    > > colonial-coins-unsubscribe@egroups.com
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
    > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/


    To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    colonial-coins-unsubscribe@egroups.com



    Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/


    --0-1993433236-1045533215=:96731
    Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii

    <P><STRONG>Dave, see, you are a serious collector.  I'm just a dabbler, I have exactly 50 varities, basically R-4s are my downfall.</STRONG>
    <P><STRONG>Oh, and since you are a serious collector, you can no longer use the term "bottom feeder" when it comes to NJ's.</STRONG>
    <P><STRONG>Morris</STRONG>
    <P> <B><I>"albioncox <wierzba@attbi.com>" <wierzba@attbi.com></I></B> wrote:
    <BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid">You are definitely a serious NJ variety collector. The 25 NJ <BR>collectors may be a bit low based on responses so far.<BR><BR><BR>-- In colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com, "David L. Palmer <BR><PALMERS4@E...>" <PALMERS4@E...>wrote:<BR>> Rarity rating on NJ collectors falls to R-5+, I also do not own a <BR>71-<BR>> y, should have, but alas, could not. Just for the record, with 91 <BR>> varieties, I think I qualify as a "serious" NJ collector. Or did <BR>> someone delist a few varieties when I wasn't looking, again? David<BR>> <BR>> --- In colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com, "Clement V. Schettino" <BR>> <COPPERCLEM@A...>wrote:<BR>> > Makes sense to me Dennis, and as support I must be the 25th NJ <BR>> collector,<BR>> > because I don't have my 71-y yet!<BR>> > <BR>> > Clem<BR>> > <BR>> > <BR>> > -----Original Message-----<BR>> > From: albioncox <WIERZBA@A...>[mailto:wierzba@a...]<BR>> > Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2003 8:06 PM<BR>> > To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com<BR>> > Subject: [Colonial Numismatics] Re: How Many Colonial Collectors <BR>> are There?<BR>> > <BR>> > For the record, I think NJ variety collectors are a low R6 <BR>> (includes<BR>> > museums, inactive collectors, etc.) at 25 or so. As support, the <BR>NJ<BR>> > 71-y has 23 to 24 distinct specimens known. The last public sale <BR>> (to<BR>> > the best of my knowledge) was Griffee in '95 (to yours truly). A<BR>> > private sale of a low grade specimen happened about a year later. <BR>> All<BR>> > the known pieces are likely sitting in variety collections (with <BR>> the<BR>> > one exception of the 71-y over the Vermont). Hence the low R6<BR>> > estimate.<BR>> > <BR>> > <BR>> > <BR>> > <BR>> > <BR>> > <BR>> > -- In colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com, "David L. Palmer<BR>> > <PALMERS4@E...>" <PALMERS4@E...>wrote:<BR>> > > Just to follow thru on this, I think that Colonial collectors <BR>are<BR>> > R8<BR>> > > vs. the rest of the collecting population.<BG> David<BR>> > ><BR>> > ><BR>> > > --- In colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com, "albioncox <BR><WIERZBA@A...>"<BR>> > > <WIERZBA@A...>wrote:<BR>> > > > My guess is that the MEDIAN state coinage variety is R5+, say <BR>> 40<BR>> > > > examples. Choice examples Vf-XF maybe 4-6 for the MEDIAN. Yes<BR>> > > > collecting only choice examples of state coinage varieties is<BR>> > very<BR>> > > > difficult. Hence the price pressure for this segment.<BR>> > > ><BR>> > > ><BR>> > > ><BR>> > > ><BR>> > > > - In colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com, "colonialcoinunion<BR>> > > <JAGRE@A...>"<BR>> > > > <JAGRE@A...>wrote:<BR>> > > > > Actually I wasn't trying to further a 'slabs are good for<BR>> > > bringing<BR>> > > > > new people into the field' theory. Though for what its <BR>> worth I<BR>> > > > think<BR>> > > > > they do help reduce the intimidation factor as Dave Wnuck<BR>> > > mentioned.<BR>> > > > ><BR>> > > > > My reason for posting was that I am curious about how many<BR>> > > > collectors<BR>> > > > > the population of colonial coins can really sustain.<BR>> > > > ><BR>> > > > > I noted in a not so recent Bowers rare coin review that they<BR>> > > > remarked<BR>> > > > > about a particular colonial that 'it would be more valuable <BR>> and<BR>> > > > more<BR>> > > > > sought after if it wasn't so rare'.<BR>> > > > ><BR>> > > > > My now infamous colonial cc project is leading me to that <BR>> same<BR>> > > > > conclusion. It seems that if anything the population of <BR>nice<BR>> > > > > examples of a great many colonial types seems to be even<BR>> > smaller<BR>> > > > than<BR>> > > > > I would have imagined, as the same few examples keep re-<BR>> > > appearing<BR>> > > > > through the years in different auctions.<BR>> > > > ><BR>> > > > > If ~30 different types have populations of 20 or less <BR>> specimens<BR>> > > I<BR>> > > > > guess that means there can't be much more than a few dozen <BR>> high<BR>> > > end<BR>> > > > > type collectors or they'll be a lot of fighting over those <BR>> few<BR>> > > > > coins. Actually, that sounds about right.<BR>> > > > ><BR>> > > > > Which is to say nothing of the populations of different<BR>> > > varieties<BR>> > > > > Connecticuts or NJs or Mass silver, etc.<BR>> > > > ><BR>> > > > > JA<BR>> > > > ><BR>> > > > ><BR>> > > > ><BR>> > > > ><BR>> > > > ><BR>> > > > > --- In colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com, Morris Hankins<BR>> > > > > <JOSHALSO2000@Y...>wrote:<BR>> > > > > > Dave - don't set much store by my agreement. I am a<BR>> > > > > > neophyte when it comes to colonials.<BR>> > > > > ><BR>> > > > > > Wait until the experienced and hardcore colonialists<BR>> > > > > > check in.<BR>> > > > > ><BR>> > > > > > Morris<BR>> > > > > ><BR>> > > > > ><BR>> > > > > ><BR>> > > > > > --- "coinrarities <COINRARITIES@Y...>"<BR>> > > > > > <COINRARITIES@Y...>wrote:<BR>> > > > > > > Hi Morris:<BR>> > > > > > ><BR>> > > > > > ><BR>> > > > > > > Whoa! You're freakin' me out! I didn't expect<BR>> > > > > > > anyone in the chat<BR>> > > > > > > room to agree with me about slabs.<BR>> > > > > > ><BR>> > > > > > ><BR>> > > > > > > Re my definition of hard core vs. dabbler<BR>> > > > > > > colonial collectors:<BR>> > > > > > ><BR>> > > > > > ><BR>> > > > > > > HARD CORE: Have definate collecting goals in mind,<BR>> > > > > > > even if they are<BR>> > > > > > > dispirate (and even contridictory!). Regularly add<BR>> > > > > > > to their library,<BR>> > > > > > > or on-line store of knowledge.<BR>> > > > > > ><BR>> > > > > > ><BR>> > > > > > > DABBLER: Will add a piece here or there if they see<BR>> > > > > > > it, it strikes<BR>> > > > > > > their fancy, and they have the discretionary funds.<BR>> > > > > > > May or may not<BR>> > > > > > > be a "club joiner".<BR>> > > > > > ><BR>> > > > > > > People can certainly drift from one catagory to the<BR>> > > > > > > other over time...<BR>> > > > > > ><BR>> > > > > > ><BR>> > > > > > > I'm sure others can refine these definitions.<BR>> > > > > > ><BR>> > > > > > > Rgds,<BR>> > > > > > > Dave W.<BR>> > > > > > ><BR>> > > > > > ><BR>> > > > > > > --- In colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com, Morris<BR>> > > > > > > Hankins<BR>> > > > > > > <JOSHALSO2000@Y...>wrote:<BR>> > > > > > > > Dave, inclined to agree with you. I got my<BR>> > > > > > > baptism of<BR>> > > > > > > > fire on Large Cents. Now there is an area that<BR>> > > > > > > really<BR>> > > > > > > > needs cleaned up. These were not slabbed. Bob<BR>> > > > > > > > Grellman did the attributions and grading on them<BR>> > > > > > > and<BR>> > > > > > > > most all were 20 points under their purported<BR>> > > > > > > grade.<BR>> > > > > > > ><BR>> > > > > > > > I have a bought a few colonials that were slabbed<BR>> > > > > > > as<BR>> > > > > > > > it seemed that they were either undervalued and<BR>> > > > > > > being<BR>> > > > > > > > ignored or people were away at shows. Most of<BR>> > > > > > > them<BR>> > > > > > > > were fairly close on grading, but a low grade<BR>> > > > > > > Machins<BR>> > > > > > > > turned out to be a Ctft Brit with a hugh die crack<BR>> > > > > > > > through the spray. They have now all been<BR>> > > > > > > liberated.<BR>> > > > > > > ><BR>> > > > > > > > So yes, it will help some of the newbies get<BR>> > > > > > > started.<BR>> > > > > > > ><BR>> > > > > > > > However, my question is in regards to Your PSS.<BR>> > > > > > > > Please define your definition of hardcore and<BR>> > > > > > > > dabblers.<BR>> > > > > > > ><BR>> > > > > > > > Thanks<BR>> > > > > > > ><BR>> > > > > > > > Morris<BR>> > > > > > > ><BR>> > > > > > > > --- "coinrarities <COINRARITIES@Y...>"<BR>> > > > > > > > <COINRARITIES@Y...>wrote:<BR>> > > > > > > > > John:<BR>> > > > > > > > ><BR>> > > > > > > > > Sinerely,<BR>> > > > > > > > > Dave Wnuck<BR>> > > > > > > > ><BR>> > > > > > > > > PPS: I guesstimate the number of hard-core<BR>> > > > > > > colonial<BR>> > > > > > > > > collectors at<BR>> > > > > > > > > about 200; add in the dabblers and you get to<BR>> > > > > > > 800 or<BR>> > > > > > > > > so.<BR>> > > > > > > > ><BR>> > > > > > > > ><BR>> > > > > > > > ><BR>> > > > > > > > ><BR>> > > > > > > > > --- In colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com,<BR>> > > > > > > > > "colonialcoinunion<BR>> > > > > > > > > <JAGRE@A...>" <JAGRE@A...>wrote:<
來源網址 發布日期
  • 2003-02-17
體積
  • 1

人际关系

NNP作者