Washington Draped Bust Restrike vs Original 上市 Deposited
- From jagre@attbi.com Wed Feb 26 18:13:02 2003
Return-Path: <jagre@attbi.com>
X-Sender: jagre@attbi.com
X-Apparently-To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_4); 27 Feb 2003 02:13:00 -0000
Received: (qmail 28808 invoked from network); 27 Feb 2003 02:13:00 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217)
by m15.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 27 Feb 2003 02:13:00 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO n12.grp.scd.yahoo.com) (66.218.66.67)
by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 27 Feb 2003 02:13:00 -0000
Received: from [66.218.67.177] by n12.grp.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 27 Feb 2003 02:13:00 -0000
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 02:12:57 -0000
To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Washington Draped Bust Restrike vs Original
Message-ID: <b3js79+vpo0@eGroups.com>
User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Length: 735
X-Mailer: Yahoo Groups Message Poster
From: "colonialcoinunion <jagre@attbi.com>" <jagre@attbi.com>
X-Originating-IP: 65.96.211.39
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=127693374
X-Yahoo-Profile: colonialcoinunion
Heritage was showing a Washington Draped Bust original in choice mint state
which I had them send me on spec.
The coin arrived and it appears to me based on Breen and on on the very
detailed write-up accompanying lot 188 in the Ludwig Smith 1995 auction that
its actually a restrike.
I base my view on the fact that it appears to have a large date - that alone
seems to make it a restrike - plus the toga fold is consistent with the restrike
photos in Breen and doesn't match the Smith coin which was described as an
original.
Before I send this back I thought I'd check in here and see if the date and fold
are the only ways to tell. Note the coin is in a PCGS holder so I can't see the
edge or weigh it.
Thanks,
JA
- 2003-02-26
- 1
