[Colonial Numismatics] Grading Public Deposited

Re

Article content
  • From mariobyrge@comcast.net Tue Jan 06 09:28:50 2004
    Return-Path: <mariobyrge@comcast.net>
    X-Sender: mariobyrge@comcast.net
    X-Apparently-To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
    Received: (qmail 86215 invoked from network); 6 Jan 2004 17:28:49 -0000
    Received: from unknown (66.218.66.167)
    by m12.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 6 Jan 2004 17:28:49 -0000
    Received: from unknown (HELO sccrmhc13.comcast.net) (204.127.202.64)
    by mta6.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 6 Jan 2004 17:28:49 -0000
    Received: from computer (bgp01097770bgs.warn1201.mi.comcast.net[68.43.146.39])
    by comcast.net (sccrmhc13) with SMTP
    id <2004010617284801600niv0ge>; Tue, 6 Jan 2004 17:28:48 +0000
    Message-ID: <000d01c3d479$ba940520$27922b44@warn1201.mi.comcast.net>
    To: <colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com>
    References: <bteqqb+fk2v@eGroups.com>
    Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2004 12:22:57 -0500
    MIME-Version: 1.0
    Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
    boundary="----=_NextPart_000_000A_01C3D44F.D1840160"
    X-Priority: 3
    X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
    X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
    X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
    X-eGroups-Remote-IP: 204.127.202.64
    From: "mario" <mariobyrge@comcast.net>
    Subject: Re: [Colonial Numismatics] Grading
    X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=160753362
    X-Yahoo-Profile: jsuis2003

    ------=_NextPart_000_000A_01C3D44F.D1840160
    Content-Type: text/plain;
    charset="iso-8859-1"
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

    Hi Steve;
    I personally think that a coin should have obverse and reverse grading for =
    the reason of die states. Later die states weaken the coins details, thus i=
    nessense, lowering the grade somewhat, but on the otherhand, the die state =
    can attribute the rarity also.
    MARIO
    ----- Original Message -----=20
    From: Steve=20
    To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com=20
    Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 12:21 PM
    Subject: Re: [Colonial Numismatics] Grading


    Does anyone agree with me that grades should always be split Obv/Rev=20
    as opposed to ONLY one grade for the entire coin.....I could own a=20
    coin with a perfect mint state obverse that someone took a nail to on=20
    the reverse....this coin could be light years better on the obverse=20
    than the highest condition census coin but because of the reverse=20
    damage, people have to look at an inferior obverse as the number one=20
    coin. (which it is overall, but not taken seperately)

    steve



    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------=
    ---
    Yahoo! Groups Links

    a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/colonial-coins/
    =20=20=20=20=20=20
    b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    colonial-coins-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
    =20=20=20=20=20=20
    c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service=
    .=20


    ------=_NextPart_000_000A_01C3D44F.D1840160
    Content-Type: text/html;
    charset="iso-8859-1"
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

    <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
    <HTML><HEAD>
    <META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; charset=3Diso-8859-1"=
    >
    <META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1106" name=3DGENERATOR>
    <STYLE></STYLE>
    </HEAD>
    <BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
    <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Hi Steve;</FONT></DIV>
    <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I personally think that a coin should have=
    obverse=20
    and reverse grading for the reason of die states. Later die states weaken t=
    he=20
    coins details, thus inessense, lowering the grade somewhat, but on the=20
    otherhand, the die state can attribute the rarity also.</FONT></DIV>
    <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>MARIO</FONT></DIV>
    <BLOCKQUOTE=20
    style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LE=
    FT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
    <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
    <DIV=20
    style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>Fro=
    m:</B>=20
    <A title=3Dtaxi_steve929@yahoo.com=20
    href=3D"mailto:taxi_steve929@yahoo.com">Steve</A> </DIV>
    <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A=20
    title=3Dcolonial-coins@yahoogroups.com=20
    href=3D"mailto:colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com">colonial-coins@yahoogroups=
    .com</A>=20
    </DIV>
    <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Tuesday, January 06, 2004 12=
    :21=20
    PM</DIV>
    <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [Colonial Numismatics=
    ]=20
    Grading</DIV>
    <DIV><BR></DIV><TT>Does anyone agree with me that grades should always be=
    =20
    split Obv/Rev <BR>as opposed to ONLY one grade for the entire coin.....I =
    could=20
    own a <BR>coin with a perfect mint state obverse that someone took a nail=
    to=20
    on <BR>the reverse....this coin could be light years better on the obvers=
    e=20
    <BR>than the highest condition census coin but because of the reverse=20
    <BR>damage, people have to look at an inferior obverse as the number one=
    =20
    <BR>coin. (which it is overall, but not taken=20
    seperately)<BR><BR>        =20
    steve<BR><BR></TT><BR><TT>
    <HR width=3D500>
    <B>Yahoo! Groups Links</B><BR>
    <UL>
    <LI>To visit your group on the web, go to:<BR><A=20
    href=3D"http://groups.yahoo.com/group/colonial-coins/">http://groups.ya=
    hoo.com/group/colonial-coins/</A><BR> =20

    <LI>To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:<BR><A=20
    href=3D"mailto:colonial-coins-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=3DUns=
    ubscribe">colonial-coins-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com</A><BR> =20

    <LI>Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the <A=20
    href=3D"http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/">Yahoo! Terms of Service</A>.=
    =20
    </LI></UL></TT><BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>

    ------=_NextPart_000_000A_01C3D44F.D1840160--
Source URL Date published
  • 2004-01-06
Volume
  • 1

Relationships

NNP Author