Shamus - I may have the answer? 上市 Deposited

文章內容
  • From johnmenc@optonline.net Wed Jan 11 10:51:37 2006
    Return-Path: <johnmenc@optonline.net>
    X-Sender: johnmenc@optonline.net
    X-Apparently-To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
    Received: (qmail 99766 invoked from network); 11 Jan 2006 18:51:36 -0000
    Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218)
    by m31.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 11 Jan 2006 18:51:36 -0000
    Received: from unknown (HELO n2a.bullet.scd.yahoo.com) (66.94.237.36)
    by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 11 Jan 2006 18:51:36 -0000
    Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
    Received: from [66.218.69.2] by n2.bullet.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 11 Jan 2006 18:51:20 -0000
    Received: from [66.218.66.83] by t2.bullet.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 11 Jan 2006 18:51:20 -0000
    Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 18:51:20 -0000
    To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
    Message-ID: <dq3k38+qfto@eGroups.com>
    In-Reply-To: <dq3g6a+ghlt@eGroups.com>
    User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82
    MIME-Version: 1.0
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
    X-Mailer: Yahoo Groups Message Poster
    X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: groups-compose
    X-Originating-IP: 66.94.237.36
    X-eGroups-Msg-Info: 1:12:0:0
    X-Yahoo-Post-IP: 65.164.33.248
    From: "John Lorenzo" <johnmenc@optonline.net>
    Subject: Shamus - I may have the answer?
    X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=111282553; y=UYq5enTzg6Joqzhlda9rKFIz9qNMMGD4Dev82v25yiIDYsMAwop8RuQDtA
    X-Yahoo-Profile: colonial_john_c4

    Shamus - When I look at the colonial group say 25 years ago and I=20
    look at the colonial group today I find today of course many more=20
    people in this niche than 25 years ago. You of course can back much=20
    longer. When I first started (late 70's) I did not see much DEAD=20
    WEIGHT. Or putting it in other terms Shamus almost everyone KNEW=20
    alot and/or was a HARD CORE copper collector with little or casual=20
    collecting. Additionally almost everone was quite territorial in=20
    their own State Coinage area - myself in NJ's. There were no casual=20
    or so-called weekend type collectors. Even Stacks auctions in the=20
    mid to late 80's you would see the same dozen people - all very=20
    passionate, well-learned experienced bidders each taking a slice of=20
    the pie. Today Shamus the group is more diverse - how many people in=20
    this group today REALLY CARE whether fingerprint linking or=20
    metallurgy will be the main diagnostic tool 50 years from now ...=20
    maybe a dozen of the 350 members. You need to keep this in mind=20
    Shamus as I do when I post here ... sometimes the feedback is useful=20
    and sometimes annoying. What may also be depressing is that the=20
    knowledge behind each series has grown and with current prices it=20
    really does not matter how much you know but to a large extent its=20
    simply how much you got in your pocket ($$$). Twenty five years ago=20
    knowing more than the other ELEVEN guys in the Auction War Room as=20
    one collector I know use to call it was a big advantage - today how=20
    important is this EXTRA information - minimally - at best in terms=20
    of buying the so-called SLEEPER of the sale ... so Shamus - who is=20
    going to spend 10 hours a week to build an E-SIG in C4 today? ...=20
    really nobody ... there is no purpose anymore since there is so=20
    little monetary advantage behind such an endeavor. Other than these=20
    C4 specialized books which will be written which pretty much will=20
    not be anymore than fine tuning all the existing varieities and=20
    their diagnostics ... you can't really expect anymore today in 2006?=20
    Soon people will be spending many times more for a plated 1775 C4=20
    PLATED Long Neck than a cast George II contemporary counterfeit ...=20
    this is the new C4 in the 21st Century Shamus ... just don't take it=20
    that seriously ... just keep reading & learning & collecting ... and=20
    once in awhile think about the GOOD OLD DAYS where everyone was=20
    tuned in - ADVANCED - and there was no STATIC in the background <BG>.

    JPL
    =20=20=20






    --- In colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com, "shamus12017"=20
    <shamus12017@y...> wrote:
    >
    > 11 JAN 2006
    >=20
    > Hi all --
    >=20
    > Since I was booted off this eGroup (and C4) by the moderator for=20
    > reasons that are uncertain to me, I must sneak in the back door=20
    like=20
    > this in order to post a message.
    >=20
    > Of the several hundred persons who are members of this eGroup,=20
    only=20
    > about 10 or so use it any longer for communnication purposes.=20=20
    This=20
    > group, like the eSIGs, has been ruined by a bunch of jerks with=20
    posts=20
    > similar to the following, and you each know who you are.=20
    Communications=20
    > between those seriously interested in Early American numismatics=20
    is now=20
    > accomplished privately on the Internet.
    >=20
    > My recommendation is that this eGroup be cancelled by the=20
    moderator as=20
    > it now longer serves any useful purpose to those of us who would=20
    like=20
    > to discuss Early American numismatics.
    >=20
    > Shamus
    >=20
    > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
    =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
    =3D
    >=20
    > Subject:=20
    > RE: [Colonial Numismatics] Another Reason to=20
    unsubscribe=20
    > from the list
    > Date:=20
    > Wed, 11 Jan 2006 09:45:44 -0500
    > From:=20
    > "palmers4@e..." <palmers4@e...>
    > Reply-To:=20
    > colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
    > To:=20
    > colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
    >=20
    >=20
    >=20
    >=20
    > John, I agree that these posts look bad for the group, and are=20
    > personally
    > distressing to me, as well. I have no idea what happened last=20
    night. I
    > don't think it was a full moon, but Steve gets like that once in=20
    > awhile,
    > and I think most of us have learned to turn it off when he does=20
    it.=20
    > I think to some extent, Stan has felt put upon on the group, of=20
    late,=20
    > due
    > to his not being able to share some info, as yet, and he has been=20
    taken=20
    > to
    > task for that. It is confidential, at this time, partly due to the=20
    book=20
    > in
    > the works, and the amount of time and $ spent to get to the point=20
    of
    > research they are at. I offer no excuse for Stan's post last=20
    night, as=20
    > it
    > took me totally by surprise.=20
    > I must assume the moderator is out of town, as he usually handles=20
    > outbursts
    > like that quite quickly. I would hope we can handle it ourselves=20
    > without
    > quitting.=20
    > I think even the lurkers on the group have something to offer. We=20
    have=20
    > had
    > posts from a couple over the last few weeks, and I look forward to=20
    > more.
    > You have become a central figure to the group, sometimes keeping=20
    us on
    > point, and sometimes, thankfully taking us off point. I would hate=20
    to=20
    > see
    > you, or anyone else on the group quit over a couple of stupid=20
    posts. I=20
    > know
    > I have made a couple in the past. David
    >=20
    > Original Message:
    > -----------------
    > From: John Lupia jlupia2@y...
    > Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 06:14:47 -0800 (PST)
    > To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
    > Subject: [Colonial Numismatics] Another Reason to unsubscribe from=20
    the=20
    > list
    >=20
    >=20
    > <html><body>
    >=20
    >=20
    > <tt>
    > <BR>
    > <BR>
    > --- Stan Stephens <sstephens@h...> wrote:<BR>
    > <BR>
    > > Steve . you are the best.<BR>
    > > I am pissed at allmost everyone using this thread<BR>
    > > heading.<BR>
    > > Up unto now I have really tried to keep my subjects<BR>
    > > intact.<BR>
    > > Fuck that.<BR>
    > > Steve, I just got back from watching King<BR>
    > > Kong....the big ape is super<BR>
    > > cool.<BR>
    > > I am really pissed about the subjects<BR>
    > > headings.....and I know that<BR>
    > > there are people on this list who feel the same....<BR>
    > > so fuck off.<BR>
    > > Vote me off.<BR>
    > > This is fucked up and I have read the current<BR>
    > > threads three times.<BR>
    > > David, Ray and Roger ......you guys should know<BR>
    > > better....I I love all<BR>
    > > three of you guys....but this sort of email in my<BR>
    > > opinion.....sucks<BR>
    > > (vagueness) and it turns me off.<BR>
    > > I archive everything.<BR>
    > > ps.<BR>
    > > I read this three times and I still pressed the send<BR>
    > > button.<BR>
    > > Damn it change the thread.<BR>
    > > Why is this so hard?<BR>
    > > Stan <BR>
    > > <BR>
    > > >>> taxi_steve929@y... 01/10/06 8:21 PM >>><BR>
    > > Ching dow!!!!!!!! They are the best<BR>
    > > brother!!!!!!!!!!! Gimmie some<BR>
    > > scotcth@@@ Roger is in a blind drunk....lupia is all<BR>
    > > messed up on pot<BR>
    > > and Oliver is heavily into the coke.......Ray's<BR>
    > > hitting a heavy bag<BR>
    > > yelling somthing about cab drivers.....I'm sitting<BR>
    > > back just relaxing<BR>
    > > waiting for my good friends to give me a hug and<BR>
    > > kiss!!!!!!!!!!!<s>....I<BR>
    > > am only kidding about you all....I am a fat drunk<BR>
    > > and take me for what I<BR>
    > > am worth!!!!!!!!!<BR>
    > > <BR>
    > > Stan Stephens <sstephens@h...> wrote:=A0 Here<BR>
    > > are three examples<BR>
    > > of the figure 8 tail.<BR>
    > > The three images are about 370K total.<BR>
    > > The third one is shaped like infinity sign.<BR>
    > > Syd, I thought I brought the group with your<BR>
    > > horizontal 8 under the<BR>
    > > king in but I goofed up.<BR>
    > > I still have my photos organized by photo shoot.<BR>
    > > Off to fianlly see King Kong.<BR>
    > > Stan<BR>
    >




來源網址 發布日期
  • 2006-01-11
體積
  • 1

人际关系

NNP作者