[Colonial Numismatics] wound down 上市 Deposited
Re
![](/assets/default-f936e9c3ea7a38e2c2092099586a71380b11258697b37fb4df376704495a849a.png)
- From bkweston@verizon.net Thu Oct 12 16:30:30 2006
Return-Path: <bkweston@verizon.net>
X-Sender: bkweston@verizon.net
X-Apparently-To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
Received: (qmail 52526 invoked from network); 12 Oct 2006 23:24:41 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217)
by m35.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 12 Oct 2006 23:24:41 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO n21b.bullet.sc5.yahoo.com) (66.163.187.188)
by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 12 Oct 2006 23:24:41 -0000
Received: from [66.163.187.122] by n21.bullet.sc5.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 12 Oct 2006 23:18:14 -0000
Received: from [66.218.69.4] by t3.bullet.sc5.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 12 Oct 2006 23:18:14 -0000
Received: from [66.218.66.70] by t4.bullet.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 12 Oct 2006 23:18:14 -0000
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 23:18:14 -0000
To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
Message-ID: <egmifm+5h96@eGroups.com>
In-Reply-To: <6B3EB9083A87C2498417028A5A46BC565A51E8@ECLUST2-VS4.adsroot.itcs.umich.edu>
User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Yahoo Groups Message Poster
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: groups-compose
X-Originating-IP: 66.163.187.188
X-eGroups-Msg-Info: 1:6:0:0
X-Yahoo-Post-IP: 128.118.110.175
From: "Byron Weston" <bkweston@verizon.net>
Subject: Re: [Colonial Numismatics] wound down
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=216644765; y=6wsbJpx2DV532hEkxtrvAdZPFDIsRcILhrgSNUTCMl1A9m4
X-Yahoo-Profile: bkweston
--- In colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com, "Freidus, Daniel"=20
<freidus@...> wrote:
>
> Byron,
>=20
> What diagnostic definitively identifies the undertype in this case?
>=20
> Dan
>=20
> P.S. Not doubting you, I'm just less experienced than you with this
> series.
I'm not all that experienced with this series either Dan, but a good=20
question nonetheless.
I originally thought the undertype was V.18-87C. The power of=20
suggestion by the seller saying in his description that the date on=20
the reverse was 178X, plus the ordinal being close to the front of=20
George's head; being closer on the 18 obv. than on the 19 obv., is=20
what made me, at first, think that the undertype was 18-87C.
Luckily for me I have Gary Trudgen double checking my attributions=20
and he's pointed out that the visible date numerals on the back are=20
actually X778, and that the front of the bustline is visible and=20
matches that on the 12 obverse with the ordinal also being close to=20
the forehead on the 12 obverse. I believe what clued him in though=20
was the end of the staff in relation to the date numerals as on the=20
78B reverse.
Gary also mentioned the style of the R in REX and the relative=20
positions and styles of these visible letters.
The comparison image of 12-78B is a little out sync with the=20
overstrike image sizewise but I had no trouble relating these=20
diagnostics from the images Gary provided.
Byron - 2006-10-12
- 1