Contenu de l'article |
- From jlupia2@yahoo.com Fri Jun 27 18:01:36 2008
Return-Path: <jlupia2@yahoo.com> X-Sender: jlupia2@yahoo.com X-Apparently-To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com X-Received: (qmail 34651 invoked from network); 28 Jun 2008 01:01:34 -0000 X-Received: from unknown (66.218.67.95) by m46.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 28 Jun 2008 01:01:34 -0000 X-Received: from unknown (HELO web36802.mail.mud.yahoo.com) (209.191.85.53) by mta16.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 28 Jun 2008 01:01:33 -0000 X-Received: (qmail 86388 invoked by uid 60001); 28 Jun 2008 01:01:33 -0000 X-Received: from [76.124.176.246] by web36802.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 27 Jun 2008 18:01:33 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.7.199 Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 18:01:33 -0700 (PDT) To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com In-Reply-To: <00f501c8d8b4$86d184d0$0202a8c0@D38VJS81> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-ID: <531225.85921.qm@web36802.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-Originating-IP: 209.191.85.53 X-eGroups-Msg-Info: 1:12:0:0:0 From: John Lupia <jlupia2@yahoo.com> Reply-To: jlupia2@yahoo.com Subject: Re: The Durst's, was Re: [Colonial Numismatics] FW: NE XII in copper-BECKER X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=95982273; y=z6CTbl8rvEDAtZg2lManliokW2HJu32t00iHLo_N_ZkcEw X-Yahoo-Profile: jlupia2
John
By the way, I never read up on a Wikipedia take on the origin of a picture = is worth a thousands words, but I can tell you this during the medieval per= iod Walfridus, a Benedictine monk used a similar phrase about the pictures = are the Bible of the poor illiterate, hence the phrase Biblia Pauperum. Tho= se who could not read the Bible relied on pictures to illustrate and tell t= he stories.=20
Now, as this applies to numismatics, if you do not know the diagnostics of = a coin verbally and can write it out then no picture is going to help!
John
John N. Lupia III New Jersey, USA; Beirut, Lebanon=20 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Roman-Catholic-News/ God Bless Everyone
--- On Fri, 6/27/08, John Louis <johnwlouis@comcast.net> wrote:
> From: John Louis <johnwlouis@comcast.net> > Subject: Re: The Durst's, was Re: [Colonial Numismatics] FW: NE XII in co= pper-BECKER > To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com > Date: Friday, June 27, 2008, 8:18 PM > John L (the other John L),=20 >=20 > I'm sorry your coin was not as you expected. >=20 > As far as pictures vs text is concerned,=20 > I am mostly a simple guy and therefore require only a > simple explanation on most topics. > From time to time I am interested in topics where I cannot > get enough information. > If we were talking about the battle of Red Bank for > instance, I would love to know every historical detail > documented and also the lore and associated stories told > from one generation to the next. > From what direction did the Hessians attack? How did they > retreat? Who is Jonas Cattell? What happened to Count Von > Donop? Where exactly is his final resting place? What > happened to the bronze field pieces that were present at > the battle? How did the Chevaux de Fries play a major role > in keeping the British Fleet from linking up with the > British Army occupying Philadelphia in the fall of 1777? > What is Fort Mud? What is Fort Billings? How much did it > cost to ferry 1 man and a horse across the Delaware River > from Philadelphia to Cooper's Ferry (modern day Camden, > NJ) in the year 1776? > In my case it largely depends on the topic. And presently I > am well satisfied to know a little about a lot of things. > To the statement that a photo can be deceiving, I would > offer that well written text can be equally deceiving. It > all depends on the intent of the writer. What does he want > you to know? What does he keep hidden? Why? What does he > want the reader to imagine? What is he saying by not > saying? What conclusions does he want you to draw? Etc.? > The bottom line is that a reader will read what he wants to > read no matter what the text says.=20 >=20 > I prefer lots of pictures when it comes to coins and > especially nice plates. > When it comes to historical events and battles, I like to > see maps and old photos and aerial photos. > But that's just me. > jwl >=20 >=20 > ----- Original Message -----=20 > From: John Lupia=20 > To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com=20 > Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 7:33 PM > Subject: Re: The Durst's, was Re: [Colonial > Numismatics] FW: NE XII in copper-BECKER >=20 >=20 > John: >=20 > Every specialist I have ever known in museums and > universities caution against reliance on photographs for > any artifact, coin included. Photographs, though useful at > times, can work the other way round and be misleading and > present faulty information depending how how the photo was > taken. Speaking of being taken I once paid hugely for a > half cent through a misleading photograph. Case closed. >=20 > the other John >=20 > John N. Lupia III > New Jersey, USA; Beirut, Lebanon=20 > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Roman-Catholic-News/ > God Bless Everyone >=20 > --- On Fri, 6/27/08, John Louis > <johnwlouis@comcast.net> wrote: >=20 > > From: John Louis <johnwlouis@comcast.net> > > Subject: Re: The Durst's, was Re: [Colonial > Numismatics] FW: NE XII in copper-BECKER > > To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com > > Date: Friday, June 27, 2008, 7:08 PM > > where does the para-phrase "a picture is like a > > thousand words" come from? > > jwl > >=20 > >=20 > > ----- Original Message -----=20 > > From: John Lupia=20 > > To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com=20 > > Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 12:24 PM > > Subject: The Durst's, was Re: [Colonial > Numismatics] > > FW: NE XII in copper-BECKER > >=20 > >=20 > > I have an antique reader from about 1800 in which > > schoolboys penned their names on the front fly pages > and > > occasional lines of verse. One poem I have found > charming, > > amusing and illuminating.=20 > >=20 > > Thrice I did good and that I heard never > > Once I did bad and that I heard ever. > >=20 > > Well printed photos of coins are evidently very > important > > for collectors to use as exemplars comparing the > details of > > the coin in print to the one in hand so see where it > falls > > in classification. Sanford Durst made many hundreds > of rare > > and obscure titles in numismatic literature > available at > > inexpensive prices. Since the operative word is > inexpensive > > one should keep in mind that by definition it could > never > > mean expensive high quality photographic plate > > reproduction. There anyone should know from common > sense > > that the main import of the value of Durst > Publications is > > on the texts. Although, perhaps, I am very > fortunate, that > > the copies of plates I have found are adequate, but, > I > > agree that they are far from superior.=20 > >=20 > > I am aware it is a very sensitive subject, and also > a > > complicated one. Images are valuable sources of > > information. But a well written text follows the > images > > very closely in every detail describing what is > visually > > evident down to the minute detail. Poorly written > texts do > > not serve in this capacity and rely on the > photographic > > plate to express and convey what they cannot. The > true > > value of a numismatic author, therefore, lies in > their > > ability to convey well in words what is obviated by > plates, > > and plates, therefore only serve to enhance the text > of a > > well written book offering supporting visual details > which > > were already painted as pictures in the minds of the > > readers from the words. As in all well written > literature > > authors paint pictures in the minds of readers, > depending > > on the genre, how much of the picture is > deliberately left > > to one's imagination. Consequently, well written > > numismatic literature controls the focus of the mind > to > > avoid imaginative > > fiction and provide clarity and precision in what a > coin > > actually looks like. Then, there are those coin > collectors > > that only look at the pictures and do not read the > texts > > and enjoy books as eye candy. Then, there ate > connoisseurs > > of books that enjoy every edition good and poor > alike for > > comparisons etc. Among the so-called numismatic > > bibliomanics are those that only buy the best > editions. So > > there are many and varied levels of numismatic book > > collecting.=20 > >=20 > > Now Sanford and Lorraine Durst have provided a > wealth of > > titles accessible to researchers that would make > research > > all the more difficult without them. In this > capacity they > > have served the numismatic community very well. > Moreover, > > they have published numerous catalogs of numismatic > > literature also valuable to the discerning > researcher. > > Beyond that, they have their own research published > which > > also has been very valuable to researchers > regardless of > > how] one reviews them and in the long term they will > be > > shown to have devoted their lives to serving the > numismatic > > community as all the greats of our collective > history. > >=20 > > John > >=20 > > John N. Lupia III > > New Jersey, USA; Beirut, Lebanon=20 > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Roman-Catholic-News/ > > God Bless Everyone > >=20 > > --- On Fri, 6/27/08, palmers4@rcn.com > > <palmers4@rcn.com> wrote: > >=20 > > > From: palmers4@rcn.com <palmers4@rcn.com> > > > Subject: Re: [Colonial Numismatics] FW: NE XII > in > > copper-BECKER > > > To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com > > > Date: Friday, June 27, 2008, 11:54 AM > > > As evidenced by the surge in collecting Large > Cents > > after > > > the publication > > > of Penny Whinsy( the original) and the surge in > > collecting > > > Connecticuts > > > after Taylor Sale, we can see the value of > plates! > > For all > > > the good the > > > Dursts may have done, they will sadly be > remembered > > for > > > those two > > > abomination reprints. David > > >=20 > > > Original Message: > > > ----------------- > > > From: James Spilman CNLF@Comcast.net > > > Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 10:20:09 -0500 > > > To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com > > > Subject: Re: [Colonial Numismatics] FW: NE XII > in > > > copper-BECKER > > >=20 > > >=20 > > > All -- > > >=20 > > > The overall quality of those reprints has been > -- > > > consistently -- poor.=20 > > > Plates are all but useless. > > >=20 > > > Jim/CNLF > > >=20 > > > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > > >=20 > > > palmers4@rcn.com wrote: > > > > Steve, They did the Connecticut reprint > you > > speak of, > > > as well as the last > > > > Penny Whimsy reprint that everyone hated. > David > > > > > > > > > > > > Original Message: > > > > ----------------- > > > > From: Steve Frank taxi_steve929@yahoo.com > > > > Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 22:21:23 -0700 > (PDT) > > > > To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com > > > > Subject: RE: [Colonial Numismatics] FW: NE > XII > > in > > > copper-BECKER > > > > > > > > > > > > this one...the plates are pretty > sharp....are > > they the > > > ones who printed > > > > that horrible connecticut book reprint??? > the > > plates > > > were absolutely > > > > useless and the reason I never bought more > than > > a > > > couple > > > > connecticuts....they're almost > impossible > > for me > > > to attribute to begin > > > > with<s> > > > > > > > > --- On Thu, 6/26/08, palmers4@rcn.com > > > <palmers4@rcn.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > From: palmers4@rcn.com > <palmers4@rcn.com> > > > > Subject: RE: [Colonial Numismatics] FW: NE > XII > > in > > > copper-BECKER > > > > To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com > > > > Date: Thursday, June 26, 2008, 1:22 AM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But due to the plates of many, they are > almost > > > useless. David > > > > > > > > Original Message: > > > > ------------ ----- > > > > From: Steve Frank taxi_steve929@ yahoo.com > > > > Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 22:09:27 -0700 > (PDT) > > > > To: colonial-coins@ yahoogroups. com > > > > Subject: RE: [Colonial Numismatics] FW: NE > XII > > in > > > copper-BECKER > > > > > > > > it's just the plate quality i was > refering > > to... > > > the books are inexpensive > > > > and great for someone on a budget.... > > > > > > > > --- On Wed, 6/25/08, John Lupia > > <jlupia2@yahoo. > > > com> wrote: > > > > > > > > From: John Lupia <jlupia2@yahoo. > com> > > > > Subject: RE: [Colonial Numismatics] FW: NE > XII > > in > > > copper-BECKER > > > > To: colonial-coins@ yahoogroups. com > > > > Date: Wednesday, June 25, 2008, 2:56 PM > > > > > > > > Hi Steve: > > > > > > > > Sanford and Lorraine Durst have done much > to > > advance > > > the field of > > > > numismatics and have little or no > recognition.=20 > > > > > > > > John N. Lupia III > > > > New Jersey, USA; Beirut, Lebanon=20 > > > > http://groups. yahoo.com/ group/Roman- > > Catholic- News/ > > > > God Bless Everyone > > > > > > > > --- On Wed, 6/25/08, Steve Frank > > <taxi_steve929@ > > > yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > >=20 > > > >> From: Steve Frank <taxi_steve929@ > > yahoo.com> > > > >> Subject: RE: [Colonial Numismatics] > FW: NE > > XII in > > > copper-BECKER > > > >> To: colonial-coins@ yahoogroups. com > > > >> Date: Wednesday, June 25, 2008, 2:51 > PM > > > >> durst published "becker the > > > counterfeiter" by sir > > > >> groge f. hill in 1995...i have > > copy...plates are > > > typical of > > > >> a lower priced copy..not horrific > > though.... > > > >> > > > >> --- On Wed, 6/25/08, John Lupia > > <jlupia2@yahoo. > > > com> > > > >> wrote: > > > >> > > > >> From: John Lupia <jlupia2@yahoo. > com> > > > >> Subject: RE: [Colonial Numismatics] > FW: NE > > XII in > > > >> copper-BECKER > > > >> To: colonial-coins@ yahoogroups. com > > > >> Date: Wednesday, June 25, 2008, 2:38 > PM > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> Clem, > > > >> > > > >> This one's for you! > > > >> > > > >> Becker, Karl Wilhelm (1772-1830), > notorious > > forger > > > of > > > >> ancient and later coins, Mason, I, No. > 6, > > > September (1867) > > > >> : 58c; American Journal of > Numismatics, > > Whole No. > > > 93, July, > > > >> 1881; (Frossard article) Mason, H-III, > No. > > 2, > > > September > > > >> (1881) : 42b; forger of coins at > Frankfort, > > > Germany from > > > >> 1815-1825.=20 > > > >> Bibliography :=20 > > > >> Colin Narbeth, The Coin Collector=C2=A2s > > Encyclopedia > > > 1 > > > >> Hill, Sir George F., Becker the > > Counterfeiter. > > > (London; > > > >> Spink and Son:1955). A reprint of the > 1924 > > and > > > 1925 > > > >> editions > > > >> > > > >> John N. Lupia III > > > >> New Jersey, USA; Beirut, Lebanon=20 > > > >> http://groups. yahoo.com/ group/Roman- > > Catholic- > > > News/ > > > >> God Bless Everyone > > > >> > > > >> --- On Wed, 6/25/08, Clement V. > Schettino > > > >> <copperclem@ comcast. net> > wrote: > > > >> > > > >>=20 > > > >>> From: Clement V. Schettino > > <copperclem@ > > > comcast. > > > >>>=20 > > > >> net> > > > >>=20 > > > >>> Subject: RE: [Colonial > Numismatics] FW: > > NE XII > > > in > > > >>>=20 > > > >> copper-BECKER > > > >>=20 > > > >>> To: colonial-coins@ yahoogroups. > com > > > >>> Date: Wednesday, June 25, 2008, > 2:30 PM > > > >>> Hey Ray, > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> It's funny you should mention > that. > > Lately > > > I have > > > >>>=20 > > > >> taken > > > >>=20 > > > >>> a fondness to the > > > >>> Becker copies. They are casts or > > electros with > > > a heavy > > > >>> plating. I find them > > > >>> quite well done. I managed to find > two, > > the > > > >>>=20 > > > >> Continental > > > >>=20 > > > >>> Currency and the > > > >>> Fugio. One problem was I > didn't > > know how > > > many > > > >>>=20 > > > >> different > > > >>=20 > > > >>> Colonial types he > > > >>> made or what constituted a > > > "complete" set. I > > > >>> tried to find out more about > > > >>> him and was bewildered why I > > couldn't find > > > much. > > > >>>=20 > > > >> At > > > >>=20 > > > >>> this point I attribute > > > >>> that to the fact that he was > > contemporary with > > > most of > > > >>>=20 > > > >> us > > > >>=20 > > > >>> so no one bothered > > > >>> to document his activities. > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> I plan to research this more, his > > activities > > > and time > > > >>> frames. Any help will > > > >>> be greatly appreciated (hint, > > hint.Mike). > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> AAR, right in the middle of my > Becker > > search I > > > came > > > >>>=20 > > > >> across > > > >>=20 > > > >>> an eBay auction > > > >>> simply titled "cions" > (yes, > > spelt > > > like > > > >>>=20 > > > >> that). My > > > >>=20 > > > >>> curiosity got the better of > > > >>> me and I opened it.WOW! Was I > happy I > > did. > > > There > > > >>>=20 > > > >> before me > > > >>=20 > > > >>> was a "full set" > > > >>> of Becker copies! And in an > original > > holder to > > > boot! > > > >>>=20 > > > >> Not > > > >>=20 > > > >>> that I even knew > > > >>> there was an "original > > holder". Long > > > story > > > >>>=20 > > > >> short > > > >>=20 > > > >>> I watched it for a week and > > > >>> nobody bid, I got it for the > opener. > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> For now I'll just show some > full > > photos, > > > no time > > > >>>=20 > > > >> for > > > >>=20 > > > >>> individual "coin" > > > >>> obv/rev close-ups yet. But after I > find > > out a > > > bit more > > > >>>=20 > > > >> I > > > >>=20 > > > >>> hope to write > > > >>> something on the subject for C4, > with > > more > > > pictures > > > >>>=20 > > > >> and > > > >>=20 > > > >>> specifications. > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> One thing I will say, because I > think > > its > > > important is > > > >>>=20 > > > >> the > > > >>=20 > > > >>> Pillar Dollar is > > > >>> dated 1760, it has a crack in the > right > > obv > > > field > > > >>> horizontally. It is the > > > >>> only specimen in my > "set" NOT > > marked > > > Becker > > > >>>=20 > > > >> on > > > >>=20 > > > >>> the edge. I see it often on > > > >>> eBay being offered as a genuine! > Be > > > warned.Beware. > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> BTW, note that this package was a > Time > > > Magazine > > > >>>=20 > > > >> offering, > > > >>=20 > > > >>> "A Fourth of July > > > >>> memento" (that's specific > ;-). > > I am > > > guessing > > > >>>=20 > > > >> it > > > >>=20 > > > >>> was a give a way with a > > > >>> subscription probably in 1976, the > > > Bicentennial Year. > > > >>> That's my guess. The > > > >>> set is not dated. Again I am > looking > > for more > > > >>>=20 > > > >> information, > > > >>=20 > > > >>> such as does > > > >>> anyone have a set? Has anyone seen > one > > before? > > > Does > > > >>>=20 > > > >> anyone > > > >>=20 > > > >>> know when it was > > > >>> distributed? Did EVERYONE throw > > their's > > > away!!! > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> Thanks, > > > >>> > > > >>> Clem > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> PS, I will reply with a few more > > images. > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> _____=20 > > > >>> > > > >>> From: colonial-coins@ yahoogroups. > com > > > >>> [mailto:colonial- coins@ > yahoogroups. > > com] > > > >>> On Behalf Of Ray Williams > > > >>> Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2008 > 1:10 PM > > > >>> To: colonial-coins@ yahoogroups. > com > > > >>> Subject: Re: [Colonial > Numismatics]
|