Connecticut 56-XX vs 56-RR.2 and 37.10-RR vs 37.10-RR.1 Öffentlichkeit Deposited

Artikelinhalt
  • From ershye@aol.com Wed Dec 18 18:55:21 2002
    Return-Path: <ershye@aol.com>
    X-Sender: ershye@aol.com
    X-Apparently-To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
    Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_0); 19 Dec 2002 02:55:21 -0000
    Received: (qmail 59289 invoked from network); 19 Dec 2002 02:55:20 -0000
    Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217)
    by m15.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 19 Dec 2002 02:55:20 -0000
    Received: from unknown (HELO n23.grp.scd.yahoo.com) (66.218.66.79)
    by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 19 Dec 2002 02:55:20 -0000
    Received: from [66.218.67.152] by n23.grp.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 19 Dec 2002 02:55:20 -0000
    Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 02:55:20 -0000
    To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
    Subject: Connecticut 56-XX vs 56-RR.2 and 37.10-RR vs 37.10-RR.1
    Message-ID: <atrceo+cclg@eGroups.com>
    User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82
    MIME-Version: 1.0
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
    Content-Length: 559
    X-Mailer: Yahoo Groups Message Poster
    From: "ershye <ershye@aol.com>" <ershye@aol.com>
    X-Originating-IP: 152.163.189.100
    X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=12795485
    X-Yahoo-Profile: ershye

    Hi everyone. I have been doing some research the past couple days and
    I was wondering why I have been seeing Connecticut RR.1 and RR.2
    reverses listed in catalogs as recently as the Perkins and C-4 2000
    sales. Clearly these are two different dies. The XX reverse has the
    fleurons before INDE both pointing to the right <- <- while the RR
    reverse has the fleurons before INDE facing each other -> <-. Walter
    Breen and Ted Craige said the same thing but for some reason these
    two reverses are grouped together today as RR.1 and RR.2. Any
    thoughts?

    Ed

Quell-URL Veröffentlichungsdatum
  • 2002-12-18
Volumen
  • 1

Beziehungen

NNP-Autor