Connecticut 56-XX vs 56-RR.2 and 37.10-RR vs 37.10-RR.1 上市 Deposited
- From ershye@aol.com Wed Dec 18 18:55:21 2002
Return-Path: <ershye@aol.com>
X-Sender: ershye@aol.com
X-Apparently-To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_0); 19 Dec 2002 02:55:21 -0000
Received: (qmail 59289 invoked from network); 19 Dec 2002 02:55:20 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217)
by m15.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 19 Dec 2002 02:55:20 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO n23.grp.scd.yahoo.com) (66.218.66.79)
by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 19 Dec 2002 02:55:20 -0000
Received: from [66.218.67.152] by n23.grp.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 19 Dec 2002 02:55:20 -0000
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 02:55:20 -0000
To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Connecticut 56-XX vs 56-RR.2 and 37.10-RR vs 37.10-RR.1
Message-ID: <atrceo+cclg@eGroups.com>
User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Length: 559
X-Mailer: Yahoo Groups Message Poster
From: "ershye <ershye@aol.com>" <ershye@aol.com>
X-Originating-IP: 152.163.189.100
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=12795485
X-Yahoo-Profile: ershye
Hi everyone. I have been doing some research the past couple days and
I was wondering why I have been seeing Connecticut RR.1 and RR.2
reverses listed in catalogs as recently as the Perkins and C-4 2000
sales. Clearly these are two different dies. The XX reverse has the
fleurons before INDE both pointing to the right <- <- while the RR
reverse has the fleurons before INDE facing each other -> <-. Walter
Breen and Ted Craige said the same thing but for some reason these
two reverses are grouped together today as RR.1 and RR.2. Any
thoughts?
Ed - 2002-12-18
- 1
