Connecticut 56-XX vs 56-RR.2 and 37.10-RR vs 37.10-RR.1 Pubblico Deposited

Contenuto dell'articolo
  • From ershye@aol.com Wed Dec 18 18:55:21 2002
    Return-Path: <ershye@aol.com>
    X-Sender: ershye@aol.com
    X-Apparently-To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
    Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_0); 19 Dec 2002 02:55:21 -0000
    Received: (qmail 59289 invoked from network); 19 Dec 2002 02:55:20 -0000
    Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217)
    by m15.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 19 Dec 2002 02:55:20 -0000
    Received: from unknown (HELO n23.grp.scd.yahoo.com) (66.218.66.79)
    by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 19 Dec 2002 02:55:20 -0000
    Received: from [66.218.67.152] by n23.grp.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 19 Dec 2002 02:55:20 -0000
    Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 02:55:20 -0000
    To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
    Subject: Connecticut 56-XX vs 56-RR.2 and 37.10-RR vs 37.10-RR.1
    Message-ID: <atrceo+cclg@eGroups.com>
    User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82
    MIME-Version: 1.0
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
    Content-Length: 559
    X-Mailer: Yahoo Groups Message Poster
    From: "ershye <ershye@aol.com>" <ershye@aol.com>
    X-Originating-IP: 152.163.189.100
    X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=12795485
    X-Yahoo-Profile: ershye

    Hi everyone. I have been doing some research the past couple days and
    I was wondering why I have been seeing Connecticut RR.1 and RR.2
    reverses listed in catalogs as recently as the Perkins and C-4 2000
    sales. Clearly these are two different dies. The XX reverse has the
    fleurons before INDE both pointing to the right <- <- while the RR
    reverse has the fleurons before INDE facing each other -> <-. Walter
    Breen and Ted Craige said the same thing but for some reason these
    two reverses are grouped together today as RR.1 and RR.2. Any
    thoughts?

    Ed

URL di origine Data di pubblicazione
  • 2002-12-18
Volume
  • 1

Le relazioni

Autore NNP