[Colonial Numismatics] Wood-17? 上市 Deposited

Re

文章內容
  • From gnichols@cogeco.ca Fri Oct 25 10:00:41 2002
    Return-Path: <gnichols@cogeco.ca>
    X-Sender: gnichols@cogeco.ca
    X-Apparently-To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
    Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_2_1); 25 Oct 2002 17:00:41 -0000
    Received: (qmail 17918 invoked from network); 25 Oct 2002 17:00:41 -0000
    Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218)
    by m8.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 25 Oct 2002 17:00:41 -0000
    Received: from unknown (HELO fep5.cogeco.net) (216.221.81.25)
    by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 25 Oct 2002 17:00:41 -0000
    Received: from default (d150-3-210.home.cgocable.net [24.150.3.210])
    by fep5.cogeco.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 8E2B26257
    for <colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com>; Fri, 25 Oct 2002 13:00:39 -0400 (EDT)
    Message-ID: <001601c27c47$dc8940e0$d2039618@scwe2.on.cogeco.ca>
    To: <colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com>
    References: <LPBBKJNANGIPBNPALMHPCENADBAA.copperclem@attbi.com>
    Subject: Re: [Colonial Numismatics] Wood-17?
    Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 12:59:20 -0400
    MIME-Version: 1.0
    Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
    boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0013_01C27C26.55560F20"
    X-Priority: 3
    X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
    X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600
    X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600
    From: "Gord Nichols" <gnichols@cogeco.ca>
    X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=93054328
    X-Yahoo-Profile: tokengord

    ------=_NextPart_000_0013_01C27C26.55560F20
    Content-Type: text/plain;
    charset="Windows-1252"
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

    Hi Clem

    That is a Wood 17. Check the bow and ribands(ribbons). They appear as if th=
    ey are a little man bending to tie his ski boots.????? The point is that on=
    Wood 17(and 18) the little man's back follows the nape of George's neck ex=
    actly. There is a narrow (always the same width) channel between the little=
    man's back and the back or nape of George's neck.=20

    Check a Wood 16 (or the Charlton photo of a Wood 17 which is a Wood 16) at =
    the bow and ribbons. The 'little man's' back has 2 huge triangular points i=
    n it and doesn't follow the nape of George's neck at all. Also on Wood 16 t=
    he 'little man' has a crook in his neck.

    With respect to your lack of detail on the lower part of the reverse perhap=
    s you have a different die rotation. If you check the scan of the Wood 25 I=
    sent against the Baker speciman in the Taylor catalog you will note that t=
    he Baker speciman has no detail on the bottom of the obverse and mine has p=
    lenty. Mine is a 90 degrees rotation while I think most previously known sp=
    ecimans were coin turn. Die rotation does matter.

    Or perhaps yours is just weakly struck. I have noticed what appears to be a=
    wide varience in striking pressure with many of the commoner blacksmiths. =
    Of relatively high grade looking pieces some will appear to be flat with al=
    most zero relief while others have plenty of relief but still no details. A=
    ny details on the reverse of a Wood 17 are shallowly cut at best and a spec=
    imen must be well struck to show them.

    I hope this is of some help.
    Gord
    ----- Original Message -----=20
    From: Clement V. Schettino=20
    To: C4=20
    Cc: Clem at Work=20
    Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 7:36 AM
    Subject: [Colonial Numismatics] Wood-17?


    Hey Gord,

    Well I suppose this image makes my claims look pretty weak, but it's the
    best I could get with a scanner. I had to way over lighten to show the
    detail I did. There is considerably more detail on the bust and a bit mor=
    e
    on the nose, as well as on the reverse, especially at the spray and below
    that arm. All that "stuff" that looks like dirt, is dirt. I've got some B=
    lue
    Ribbon on it trying to soften it up.

    In "the brass" the coin appears quite choice, and I'm happy with it anywa=
    y.

    But it is a 17, right?

    Clem

    Yahoo! Groups Sponsor=20
    ADVERTISEMENT
    =20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20
    =20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20
    =20=20=20=20=20=20=20
    =20=20=20=20=20=20=20

    To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    colonial-coins-unsubscribe@egroups.com



    Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.=20


    ------=_NextPart_000_0013_01C27C26.55560F20
    Content-Type: text/html;
    charset="Windows-1252"
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

    <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
    <HTML><HEAD>
    <META content=3D"text/html; charset=3Dwindows-1252" http-equiv=3DContent-Ty=
    pe>
    <META content=3D"MSHTML 5.00.2919.6307" name=3DGENERATOR>
    <STYLE></STYLE>
    </HEAD>
    <BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
    <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Hi Clem</FONT></DIV>
    <DIV> </DIV>
    <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>That is a Wood 17. Check the bow and=20
    ribands(ribbons). They appear as if they are a little man bending to tie hi=
    s ski=20
    boots.????? The point is that on Wood 17(and 18) the little man's back foll=
    ows=20
    the nape of George's neck exactly. There is a narrow (always the same width=
    )=20
    channel between the little man's back and the back or nape of George's neck=
    .=20
    </FONT></DIV>
    <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
    <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Check a Wood 16 (or the Charlton photo of =
    a Wood 17=20
    which is a Wood 16) at the bow and ribbons. The 'little man's' back has 2 h=
    uge=20
    triangular points in it and doesn't follow the nape of George's neck at all=
    .=20
    Also on Wood 16 the 'little man' has a crook in his neck.</FONT></DIV>
    <DIV> </DIV>
    <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>With respect to your lack of detail on the=
    lower=20
    part of the reverse perhaps you have a different die rotation. If you check=
    the=20
    scan of the Wood 25 I sent against the Baker speciman in the Taylor catalog=
    you=20
    will note that the Baker speciman has no detail on the bottom of the obvers=
    e and=20
    mine has plenty. Mine is a 90 degrees rotation while I think most previousl=
    y=20
    known specimans were coin turn. Die rotation does matter.</FONT></DIV>
    <DIV> </DIV>
    <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Or perhaps yours is just weakly struck. I =
    have=20
    noticed what appears to be a wide varience in striking pressure with many o=
    f the=20
    commoner blacksmiths. Of relatively high grade looking pieces some will app=
    ear=20
    to be flat with almost zero relief while others have plenty of relief but s=
    till=20
    no details. Any details on the reverse of a Wood 17 are shallowly cut at be=
    st=20
    and a specimen must be well struck to show them.</FONT></DIV>
    <DIV> </DIV>
    <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I hope this is of some help.</FONT></DIV>
    <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Gord</FONT></DIV>
    <BLOCKQUOTE=20
    style=3D"BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0p=
    x; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px">
    <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
    <DIV=20
    style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>Fro=
    m:</B>=20
    <A href=3D"mailto:CopperClem@attbi.com" title=3DCopperClem@attbi.com>Clem=
    ent V.=20
    Schettino</A> </DIV>
    <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A=20
    href=3D"mailto:colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com"=20
    title=3Dcolonial-coins@yahoogroups.com>C4</A> </DIV>
    <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Cc:</B> <A=20
    href=3D"mailto:clement.schettino@axcelis.com"=20
    title=3Dclement.schettino@axcelis.com>Clem at Work</A> </DIV>
    <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Friday, October 25, 2002 7:3=
    6=20
    AM</DIV>
    <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> [Colonial Numismatics]=20
    Wood-17?</DIV>
    <DIV><BR></DIV><TT>Hey Gord,<BR><BR>Well I suppose this image makes my cl=
    aims=20
    look pretty weak, but it's the<BR>best I could get with a scanner. I had =
    to=20
    way over lighten to show the<BR>detail I did. There is considerably more=
    =20
    detail on the bust and a bit more<BR>on the nose, as well as on the rever=
    se,=20
    especially at the spray and below<BR>that arm. All that "stuff" that look=
    s=20
    like dirt, is dirt. I've got some Blue<BR>Ribbon on it trying to soften i=
    t=20
    up.<BR><BR>In "the brass" the coin appears quite choice, and I'm happy wi=
    th it=20
    anyway.<BR><BR>But it is a 17, right?<BR><BR>Clem<BR></TT><BR><BR><TT>To=
    =20
    unsubscribe from this group, send an email=20
    to:<BR>colonial-coins-unsubscribe@egroups.com<BR><BR></TT><BR><BR><TT>You=
    r use=20
    of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the <A=20
    href=3D"http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/">Yahoo! Terms of Service</A>.</=
    TT>=20
    <BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>

    ------=_NextPart_000_0013_01C27C26.55560F20--
來源網址 發布日期
  • 2002-10-25
體積
  • 1

人际关系

NNP作者